Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On the foolishness of "Merit Pay" for teachers.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:07 AM
Original message
On the foolishness of "Merit Pay" for teachers.
First, I am not a teacher. I run a Quality Division at a heavy manufacturing company.

We base IMPROVEMENT issues on 6 Sigma concepts. This is to say, if we wish to improve a process:

1. We set up controllable inputs,
2. We stabilize and normalize the process to respond to these inputs,
3. We design an experiment using those inputs,
4. We then define measurement criteria that are regularly challenged to demonstrate their validity to measure the process accurately.

Let us begin.

INPUTS
To define a Teaching Process for measurements, the inputs must be equal or adjusted for normality.
1. Are the students properly prepared in previous settings for the subject at hand?
2. Do the students have the tools needed to succeed under nominal effort, such as books, computers, reference materials?
3. Is the facility heated/cooled/cleaned/maintained to optimize performance, or at least equalized throughout the sample?

STABILIZE AND NORMALIZE THE PROCESS
This is one of the more difficult phases, involving the removal of roadblocks to a normal process.
1. Are the teachers normalized for experience, educational background?
2. Are the teachers tested for emotional/psychological/physical stability under pressure?
3. Are the students screened for outlier removal from the experiment (disruptors, psychological or physical instability)?

DOE
Now we can design the experiment.
1. Determine the duration of the experiment.
2. Set any patterns for sampling for data.
3. Continue to normalize inputs.

MEASUREMENT CRITERIA
Now, and only now can the measurement criteria be determined. This is of course the hardest of all areas, and I do not feel qualified to define them. This being the case, I will only mention these items.
1. Are the criteria reviewed for validity?
2. Are the criteria germane to each subject, grade level, experience, etcetera?
3. Are the criteria measurements strictly monitored with an eye toward the process' stability?

Now you see the issues in using any criteria to measure a process. In Manufacturing, this is almost child's play compared to a teaching venue. This can also be said of a Service, a Sales Function, a Raw Materials production and delivery function and so on.

But without the first phase: CONTROLLABLE AND EQUAL INPUTS, you cannot proceed as the experiment yields no valid empirical data.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Blueberry Story makes this point
http://www.jamievollmer.com/blue_story.html

She began quietly, “We are told, sir, that you manage a company that makes good ice cream.”

I smugly replied, “Best ice cream in America, Ma’am.”

“How nice,” she said. “Is it rich and smooth?”

“Sixteen percent butterfat,” I crowed.

“Premium ingredients?” she inquired.

“Super-premium! Nothing but triple A.” I was on a roll. I never saw the next line coming.

“Mr. Vollmer,” she said, leaning forward with a wicked eyebrow raised to the sky, “when you are standing on your receiving dock and you see an inferior shipment of blueberries arrive, what do you do?”

In the silence of that room, I could hear the trap snap…. I was dead meat, but I wasn’t going to lie.

“I send them back.”

“That’s right!” she barked, “and we can never send back our blueberries. We take them big, small, rich, poor, gifted, exceptional, abused, frightened, confident, homeless, rude, and brilliant. We take them with ADHD, junior rheumatoid arthritis, and English as their second language. We take them all! Every one! And that, Mr. Vollmer, is why it’s not a business. It’s school!”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I can only applaud.
That, and wonder why EVERYONE cannot see that paradigm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Because a huge swath of the population
does not believe in science. They don't know what it is, and they dismiss its product, even as they enjoy its applications.

Making matters worse, these people tend to gravitate towards politics..and what is a bigger political football than public education?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. That's a wonderful analogy!
That's a wonderful analogy! :thumbsup: Thanks for that-- I think it'll be a useful counter-point in future discussions I have regarding this topic.

"it’s not a business. It’s school!”

So true, so true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. It's not just the Statue of Liberty who accepts your tired, your weary, your poor
Your neighborhood public school does too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I wish the subject were so simple
My mother taught public vocational school. These kids didn't get regular diplomas ... but studies showed they had higher employment rates than the general population.

I remember the grants she received; they delivered quantitative results and hard standards. The cause may have been co-opted by our political opponents, but the underlying pedagogy is sound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Interesting point
The scope of her job was perhaps narrower than that of much of public education. Nowadays, we offload a lot of functions onto the public elementary and high schools. In addition to the three Rs, we need them to provide health, sex, consumer, and art education; individualized education for those with special needs; socialization and the administration of social services; and, frankly, plain old babysitting. (For the record, my son is in public school, and I gladly underwrite all of the above with my taxes, time and checkbook.) The schools need to provide this across the board to all comers, and schools which are not comparable are compared to one another. This makes the questions of merit pay and school standards very complicated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Complication is key ... which is why I went into information systems
The problem is not intractable - my mother and I dealt with all those other issues later in her life, but our support for public education never wavered. My entire life, I've heard her rail against those who taught "against the test", but they were her sincere colleagues. In the end, it was up to her to demonstrate that the resources were there for vital programs if they were handled by effective administrators.

I left Delray Beach, Florida years ago, but my mother had a chance to pay a visit a decade after we started our first kids, cops and computer cut crime program - which we left in the hands of licensed teachers and financed by the state. Very satisfying to see a total turnaround in a 'hood and she got to see it.

As for merit pay - she supported it and honestly, deserved it. But I won't argue the point ... if you never met someone like her, you wouldn't understand. But standards? They definitely can be measured and properly "normalized". I know it's a math term, but doesn't have to imply that anyone develops less than their natural potential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. It's not a business, it's a school
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Beautiful story, great point
Thanks for posting this, Ellen. Hadn't seen it before. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. At your job you must provide consistently high-quality, nearly identical
output. But IMO it's pretty obvious that the output from a school will have a wide range of "quality" for the very reason that the input IS uncontrollable, and that the focus should be on improvement rather than test scores, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That is exactly the problem.
So many wish to treat Teaching as if they were producing "widgets." It simply won't work.

We have to resign ourselves to supplying the optimum inputs ie schools, prep, and supplies to each child or the system simply fails no matter HOW we decide to measure it: you can always "game" an experiment, and when a manager sees his "division" start to fail, that's what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. 12-graders who can't spell or perform basic multiplication
is what we're getting in CA Title 1 public schools these days. They push them through the system whether they perform or not, because to hold them back them means the school loses money (student drops out because of stigma of being held back). It's getting truly ridiculous--a high school diploma means nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. That's been so for decades ... but there used to be manual jobs
Those are gone, but we haven't increased social mobility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. I support merit pay for politicians
If they get the bills I support through the Legislature and don't get vetoed, then they deserve a raise.

If they don't measure up, they face the possibility of being closed down.

And they'll need to be tested every 3-5 years to see if they measure up to other legislators.

Oh, and they'll need to engage in continuing education and professional development, to ensure that they stay current with political best practices. That'll have to be done on their own time, of course.

That's a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. Education was one of the first areas
Edited on Fri Nov-16-07 11:51 AM by supernova
where overly-zealous conservative business types tried to apply business concepts and outcomes to the public arena and what they considered "failing" schools.

They're still at it and their outcomes are no better than before. Training little human beings to think isn't the same activity at all as making identical cogs, though they want to make you think so. When their "ideas" inevitably don't work, they indulge in blaming everyone else: it's the teachers' fault or these kids are too poor to be teachable. They never stop to think their entire approach is exactly the wrong one to apply to education.

I really want get those types of nincompoops as far away from our schools as possible. I just hope our kids can survive their "ministrations."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henryman Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Please check your assumption....
...that these INPUTS can be adjusted for normality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. How so?
I'm curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. But they CAN.
ANOVA, MANOVA, Transformations such as Box-Cox...

These statistical tools and many others can be used to adjust or rule out data to show "NORMAL DISTRIBUTION" which must be present to demonstrate SIGNIFICANCE of DIFFERENCE in the results of an experiment.

I'm not throwing these out to be fancy, just to show that people playing the "Merit Pay" game aren't doing their homework. The data does not conform to normally distributed "data populations," and therefore makes invalid results of DOE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. I support merit pay for weathermen.
If the weather is sunny, they get a bonus.

If the weather is rainy, they get docked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Because you can't reject "bad inputs" (needful students) you adapt by diverting more resources to...
addressing the problem. The best way, in my mind, is more qualified teachers relative to the number of students. The greater the classroom size, the less one-to-one time a teacher has with any student on average. This is not good and will only contribute to further degradation of the public school system. You've got to increase one-to-one time with students, especially students with problems, to have a better chance of teaching them concepts used throughout life.

There are schools in Los Angeles, for instance, right now that simply couldn't handle the hypothetical scenario of a 10% or lower drop-out rate. Why? Because there aren't enough teachers and classrooms on top of the already over-crowded facilities that currently exist to cover all the extra students who would be around in such a scenario. The point is, the infrastructure is now, intentionally or unintentionally, encouraging a higher drop-out rate simply because of its degraded nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. More teachers would be lovely
Trouble is, voters in the school districts don't want to pay the extra money to get more teachers, don't want to pay the extra money to raise teachers' salaries in order to attract and retain high quality teachers, and don't want to pay the extra money in order to have the space and equipment that every decent school should have.

There is no other job, public or private, that allows people to vote on the salaries of the workers, amount of money spent on supplies and facilities, or provide regular, binding, non qualified input on how the job gets done. This simple fact is over half the reason why we're having so many education problems. Does any other business or profession run on this model? No, only experts are allowed input, on the issues. Yet somehow they expect to hold teaching to a different standard and expect the job to be done. What's even more amazing is that most of the time, teachers still manage in spite of all of that to get the job done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. ....:or adjusted for normalcy"
Edited on Fri Nov-16-07 01:39 PM by aikoaiko

You say that you need controllable and equal inputs, but didn't you qualify it with "or adjusted for normalcy"

Can't this be done with the issues involved with learning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. OF COURSE. But they aren't.
As was said up the thread: no other profession has its recompense determined by vote.

And if I may add:

No business has itself hamstrung for funding to make process, data and facility improvement by vote (millage) either. When we make the teaching of ALL CHILDREN on an EQUAL BASIS the singularly most important issue in the country (as it should be), then actually, I believe the issue of "Merit Pay" will go away on its own due to the performance of the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC