Anyone notice that CNN has mostly moderate to right wingers critique the debat? /nt

[still_one]

[MadBadger]

1. Yup. They lead off with two republicans.

[Yupster]

23. I was thinking they had two

people who worked for Bill Clinton doing the analysis in James Carville and David Gergen.

That hardly seemed objective.

I thought JC Watts was an odd choice too, but I did agree with him that Hillary won the debate big time.

She said absolutely nothing and got away with it which is perfect strategy for someone siutting on a big lead.

[Armstead]

2. Does a bear poop in the woods?

[DefenseLawyer]

3. Yes

and they all said Hillary won. Shocking. I wonder what Newt thought about the debate?

[still_one]

6. My point wasn't that, it was why ask republicans who won a Democratic debate? /nt

[DefenseLawyer]

17. Well it is the same point

In my opinion republicans are dying to go against Clinton, so naturally republicans are going to say she won. It is the same reason Pat Buchanan says Hillary wins every debate on MSNBC. As to why CNN would put them on, you figure it out.

[still_one]

19. I understand your point, but the reality is they will try to destroy any Democratic candidate

The one answer that was made crystal clear was the Supreme Court, and they ALL are on the right side of that issue

[DefenseLawyer]

20. In the general election

they will attack any Democratic candidate. That doesn't mean that they don't care who the Democratic nominee is. They want the candidate they think they can beat. It is ridiculous that partisans are asked to critique a debate, because obviously their positions are less than sincere.

[still_one]

22. You are right on all points /nt

[AlCzervik]

4. JC watts, imo he is one of the most useless commentators ever.

[MadMaddie]

7. He is pathetic..isn't he. I have never liked him.

[AlCzervik]

8. that voice, could he be more momotone and less informed?

yes of course.

[Bozita]

13. Amen. He's nothing but a talking point jukebox.

[Blackhatjack]

5. YEP next they will have Tom Delay and Ken Blackwell on asking who won the Debate!

[whirlygigspin]

10. Hillary is the republicans best hope

they're counting on 'Hillary haters' as their best chance to win in 2008

[Blackhatjack]

12. I'm afraid you are right.

[still_one]

16. Everyone of the Democratic candidates left no doubt where they stood on the Supreme Court

and whoever wins the nomination in 2008, that is a big part of what this election is about

[Cha]

18. Hell, they'll borrow rove

from Newsweak.

[ddeclue]

9. And James Carville?? Talk about a Hillary "plant"..

So much for "journalistic" integrity...

Doug D.

[nightrider767]

11. The Debate had a horrible format

Just when a candidate was to the point of wrapping up their position and giving it the final high-lite, Wolf would interrupt them. I think it really threw the candidates off. Please next time, give them some sort of que instead of the moderator interrupting and spoiling things.

Wolf is one strange cat.

[hootinholler]

14. Mostly?

Um, which one is liberal or even left of center?

-Hoot

[Cha]

15. Big Mock Shock!

They're either hoping the audience doesn't notice or they don't give a shite.

[The Gunslinger]

21. that "Liberal Media" outlet

only has moderate right to hard right wingers on their entire network.

[Greyhound]

24. Do you meant to imply that the 5 corporations that control virtually the entire American

media market are somehow skewed in favor of the wife of the man that gave them their quintopoly?

I'm utterly shocked, shocked, do you hear me, that you would make such an unwarranted accusation. Those fine American (OK, 1 French, but we hate them, so lets just pretend they're American) institutions would never, never I say, stoop to such a degrading position simply to influence an election.