You see, Dennis Kucinich is a thinker and addresses causes of problems

[SnoopDog]

His answers don’t address the symptoms of problems rather he understands that you have to address the causes of the problems.

And Mr. Kucinich bases his answers in helping America’s citizens and America first and foremost.

Obviously he is the only candidate who will bring America forward – and forward from within.

[Peregrine Took]

1. I made up my mind tonight. DK is my guy. I'm an ex Deaniac, a Gore person

but since Al isn't running - Dennis is for me!!

[Bitwit1234]

2. ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh now he's Rodan

[Audio_Al]

7. You mean THIS Rodan?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodan

Wow, what a comparison. Bitwit1234, since you post no personal information at all -- may I ask, respectfully, how old ARE you?

Al

[shanti]

3. yes

he's the only candidate that is completely honest and that i feel we can trust.

[Audio_Al]

4. Glad you made your choice. Me? I voted for Gore-Lieberman, Dean, Kerry-Edwards in the past.

If the primaries and meetings in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and the other "more important" states come up with Dennis Kuchinich, I'll vote for him.

However, we are in Oregon. It's like sitting on the sidelines until next May while others in the country get to pick our candidate. Then, we get to vote. Let's hear it for a National Primary Day.

Nevertheless, see my footnote. I am saving my choices for the future.

Respectfully,



Audio Al

[wildbilln864]

5. K&R! Go Dennis! n/t

[sakabatou]

6. Dennis is my man!

[magellan]

8. Spot on

We can have more of the same backpedaling only in Lite version, or we can move forward. I'm for forward. Finally, let's move forward again.

[KoKo]

9. he did well in the little amount of time he was given he stood tall...

honesty....!!!

[Initech]

10. Kucinich would be our FDR.

Just like the way Hoover fucked things up and FDR brought us out of it, Bush has fucked things up and we need someone to bring us out of it. Dennis is the man to do it.

[TahitiNut]

11. Not only do the approaches he advocates tie to root causes ...

... the principles he espouses are CONSISTENT across the issues in the choice of approaches. That's integrity. It's NOT putting a different wet finger in the breeze for each issue area and choosing some party/corporate line. Across the spectrum, he's consistent and coherent. I personally disagree with him on gun control and on how to deal with the problem of illegal aliens and trafficking in human labor (I prefer Richardson on that) ... but his stances DO show intellectual integrity.