Wolf, yes thats Wolf Blitzer, his speaking style, repeat his speaking style is annoying as hell

[AlCzervik]

no more Wolf moderating please.

[pearl]

1. He is absolutely no Peter Jennings

His style, and voice was smooth as silk, Jennings that is. Blitzer grates on my nerves to no end.

[AlCzervik]

3. the way he constantly repeats words, it's like a tic.

[Steven_S]

2. Oh come on..

Can't a guy get a break around here without




being criticized by all






you hand-wringing liberals.

[AlCzervik]

4. No break! and no soup for you!

[H2O Man]

5. It's not his

speaking style that is the problem. It's what he says.

[AlCzervik]

6. that too but his cadence, zomg is drives me crazy. He should smoke a big blunt

i'd bet he'd be way better.

[earthlover]

7. Wolf was pathetic

[Nutmegger]

8. This Wolfie?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdiUXbb54qU

:rofl:

[AlCzervik]

10. i know, that was Awkwardddddd. One of the parts of that interview and i don't

know if it's on that clip was Wolfie saying "we hear at cnn are very happy for your family" Ok like Cheney gives a shit and like we care that CNN is happy?

[Swamp Rat]

9. I cannot watch the debates BECAUSE Wolfie BlitzBot is "moderating"

:eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes:

BAD QUESTIONS!

BAD BAD BAD BAD BAD MODERATOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :puke: :eyes: :puke: :eyes: :puke: :eyes: :puke: :eyes:

[AlCzervik]

11. Swamp rat you must, i repeat must watch the debate, once again swamp rat

watch the debate, yes the debate.

[Swamp Rat]

12. I HATE WOLF BLITZER!!!!!!!

:D He sounds like he is perpetually constipated. :D

OK, I will try to watch a little. I was listening to it online until the stream died, but I got tired on NOT HEARING Dennis Kucinich.

[eppur_se_muova]

13. The pupil follows, I say follows his master ...

[ProgressiveFool]

14. eh, I hardly notice the cadence, but

it was infuriating the way he would take a complex question after it had been answered by one candidate, and then boil it down into an inane yes-or-no question barely relevant to the original discussion.