Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti-war Dems (Woolsey, Lee, Waters) back new withdrawal effort

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 12:55 PM
Original message
Anti-war Dems (Woolsey, Lee, Waters) back new withdrawal effort
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2007/11/antiwar_dems_back_new_withdraw.php

Anti-war Dems back new withdrawal effort

Three Anti-War Lawmakers Put Their Support Behind New Troop Withdrawal Effort

ANNE FLAHERTY
AP News

Nov 14, 2007 11:29 EST


Three leading House anti-war Democrats said Wednesday they now back a $50 billion bill that funds the war but calls for most troops home by December 2008.

Their support paves the way for the bill's passage later Wednesday. The trio, California Reps. Lynn Woolsey, Barbara Lee and Maxine Waters, represent a liberal anti-war caucus that last week expressed opposition to the measure on the grounds it was too soft and did not demand an end to combat.

The bill requires that President Bush initiate troop withdrawals within 30 days of its passage with the goal of bringing home most soldiers and Marines by Dec. 15, 2008. A provision added to the bill notes that money in the measure is available for "a safe and orderly redeployment" of U.S. troops.

"While this bill is not perfect, it is the strongest Iraq bill to date," the trio wrote in a joint statement. "This is the first time that this Congress has put forth a bill that ties funding to the responsible redeployment of our troops, and it also includes language mandating a start date for the president to begin the redeployment of our brave men and women."

Woolsey, Lee and Waters said they remained disappointed the 2008 date was a nonbinding goal that Bush could ignore. But, they said they realized the provision made it more likely that the Senate could pass it.

"This is a concrete step in the right direction, and an important marker for this Congress to lay down," they wrote.

Similar legislation has repeatedly passed along party lines in the House only to sink in the Senate, where Democrats hold a razor-thin majority and 60 votes are needed to overcome procedural hurdles.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Three of the House's FINEST!
K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maxine is the woman I want to be President first.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Me, TOO! If only! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. They need a big REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. They are some of the best Reps in the House
Hopefully, this measure will stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC