Top U.S. Commander: Hawkish Iran Rhetoric From Washington Not Helpful

[babylonsister]

US strike on Iran ‘not being prepared’

By Demetri Sevastopulo, Daniel Dombey and Andrew Ward in Washington

Published: November 12 2007 00:01 | Last updated: November 12 2007 00:01

The Pentagon is not preparing a pre-emptive attack on Iran in spite of an increase in bellicose rhetoric from Washington, according to senior officers.

Admiral William Fallon, head of Central Command, which oversees military operations in the Middle East, told the Financial Times that while dealing with Iran was a “challenge”, a strike was not “in the offing”.

“None of this is helped by the continuing stories that just keep going around and around and around that any day now there will be another war which is just not where we want to go,” he said.

“Getting Iranian behaviour to change and finding ways to get them to come to their senses and do that is the real objective. Attacking them as a means to get to that spot strikes me as being not the first choice in my book.”

Adm Fallon did not rule out the possibility of a strike at some point. But his comments served as a shot across the bows of hawks who are arguing for imminent action. They also echoed the views of the senior brass that military action is currently unnecessary, and should only be considered as an absolute last resort.

more...

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/38dd00ca-90a6-11dc-a6f2-0000779fd2ac.html

[TwilightGardener]

1. Good. Fallon and Gates are our safety nets against insanity, it seems.

[librechik]

2. they don't seem to want to help

just make things worse--more chaotic, hateful, and confused.

[Captain Hilts]

3. Gates has made some good appointments. This is one of them. nt