Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:29 AM
Original message
CNN vote
http://www.cnn.com/

Are you willing to give up some of your privacy for national security?

Yes 40% 15788
No 60% 23768
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Where is the option for, "Hell NO!"?
Benjamin Franklin said it best: "Those who would give up essential liberites for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wasn't that TJ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Actually, we are both wrong
I checked with the Wikiquote page for Benjamin Franklin and found this:

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

This statement was used as a motto on the title page of An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania (1759) which was attributed to Franklin in the edition of 1812, but in a letter of September 27, 1760 to David Hume, he states that he published this book and denies that he wrote it, other than a few remarks that were credited to the Pennsylvania Assembly, in which he served. The phrase itself was first used in a letter from that Assembly dated November 11, 1755 to the Governor of Pennsylvania. An article on the origins of this statement here includes a scan that indicates the original typography of the 1759 document, which uses an archaic form of "s": "Thoſe who would give up Essential Liberty to purchaſe a little Temporary Safety, deſerve neither Liberty nor Safety." Researchers now believe that a fellow diplomat by the name of Richard Jackson is the primary author of the book. With the information thus far available the issue of authorship of the statement is not yet definitely resolved, but the evidence indicates it was very likely Franklin, who in the Poor Richard's Almanack of 1738 is known to have written a similar proverb: "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power."

Many paraphrased variants derived from this saying have arisen and have usually been incorrectly attributed to Franklin:

"They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
"Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither"
"He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security"
"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither"
"People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both."
"If we restrict liberty to attain security we will lose them both."
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."
"He who gives up freedom for safety deserves neither"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Thank you!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. My pleasure
In fact I liked the actual BF quote that I've made it my tag line. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. exactly what i thought too ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Done. Hell no
Yes 40% 16800
No 60% 24991

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hell no still 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. who are these "yes" people
"The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either."

it will just make you a better peasant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Here's one from another DU post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. There must be 'are you fucking kidding me' catagory
Edited on Mon Nov-12-07 10:30 AM by spanone
the question should read are you willing to give up MORE of you freedoms...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. no 60% with 45513 total
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. That 40% cannot be americans.
That's disturbing to me. If it's 40% on the internets, it's probably 60% in the real world. Something is severely wrong in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Or else they are Freepers
I know, I know, I'm being redundant. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. No down to 59%
what is wrong with people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. how much privacy are these people willing to give up?

Are you willing to give up some of your privacy for national security?
Yes 41% 22117
No 59% 32118
Total Votes: 54235



The problem I see is when they think they gave up enough privacy, it'll be too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherokeeDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. Done!
Who are these idiots who haven't read the Constitution? It amazes me that the "yes" people don't even realize how much we have already had taken from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. done n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yes 41% 24826
wow, 24826 people who should be thrown in jail or deported...

who knew there were so many idiots...
oh wait.. I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC