|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:24 AM Original message |
Mukasey Roll Call; six Dems voted to confirm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. Do I notice a pattern wiht the not voting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. They've got more important things to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. One or two... I could understand it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:39 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. 39 Democrats + Bernie Sanders voted No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:42 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. I am talking of the ones who missed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I think it's mostly because they were away to campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:37 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I think any vote where the Constitution is at stake, yes they wanted to avoid it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Well, any one of them who wanted MY vote should have voted on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:43 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I was surprised at Dodd, since he has been making some interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 01:01 AM Response to Reply #15 |
28. From another thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
21. You are joking, right?? CAMPAIGNING for WHAT? To GOVERN WELL. Like this VOTE would be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. In all fairness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. There you go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbgrunt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:45 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. ...and they had enough to filibuster. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
24. since she decided to run for President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
26. Fucking shameful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
4. A lot of the usual suspects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. He is a worthless POS. I'm sure he's going to try to be as "Republican" as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonzo Gardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
22. ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelgb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
8. why no Dem filibuster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
10. Feinstein. I'm beginning to see why she is a disapointment to so many DUers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
12. can't we elect a real republican to replace DiFi...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. She's 74. Maybe she'll retire soon. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:48 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I suspect she won't be running in 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:57 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Or die. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fizzgig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
19. i am astounded that my dem (hahahaha ) senator voted against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
23. meep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
27. I think they need to resign FIRST and run for pres SECOND |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
29. Holy Crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stardust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-09-07 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
30. Thanks so much for the numbers, names,and parties. A tad off-topic but you all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC