Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A lesson on how conservatives always define the battleground and force Democrats to catch up.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:03 PM
Original message
A lesson on how conservatives always define the battleground and force Democrats to catch up.
from OurFuture.org:



Perlstein's Greatest Hits, Vol. 1: "Overton's Window"
Submitted by Rick Perlstein on November 8, 2007 - 1:31pm.


The key to success in politics is repetition. That makes things awkward for a political writer, because in writing, repetition is a sin.

I resolve: I should repeat myself more.

In my over ten years as a professional wingnutologist, I've developed quite a backfile of essays on every aspect of the conservative ascendency in America. I'm going to start linking to them more, in order to more forcefully get across whatever might be valuable in the insights I've gleaned over the years about how conservatism works, and how it differs from how liberalism works, and what this means for conservatism's political successes and governing failures.

Our lesson for today: Overton's Window, the principle, sacred to conservative politicians but tragically anathema to too many liberal politicians, that the most effective way to drive ideological change in your preferred direction is by getting ideas previously excluded as "radical" accepted as "normal" by the mainstream. (Progressives were not always allergic to this: cf., "anti-slavery," "women voting," and "free universal public education.")

Here's what I wrote about the principle in four years ago, explaining the evolution of the California recall election of 2003. I was inspired to dredge it up by two fine posts on the fetish for "centrism" in the Democratic Party.


The Fringe on Top
Extremists Help the GOP Muscle In on the Golden State
by Rick Perlstein
August 13 - 19, 2003

When conventional Democrats get together to strategize, the conclusion is ever thus: The center must lead. By this thinking, gauging what the greatest number of Americans already believe, then convincing them that you've always thought exactly the same thing, is the only way to win. Just look at Clinton.

Republicans, led by their conservative wing, do things differently. They honor the example of history—which reliably demonstrates that lasting political success only rarely originates in the center. It more often occurs when ideas once considered extreme get successfully marketed as safely centrist ones. They deem risky notions worth the chance, because such ideas can secure the biggest victory of all: changing the terms of the political debate. Then conservatives can control the playing field, with all the attendant home-field advantages.

That's the lesson of Arnold Schwarzenegger's entrance into the special election for California governor on October 7.

The movement to yank incumbent Gray Davis, and to choose a successor if he's recalled, was born and bred on California's right-wing fringe. Its roots go back all the way to the 1960s, when anti-tax activists began their mad, Ahab-like quest to mobilize the state's instruments of "direct democracy" and make it all but impossible for politicians to carry out the kind of collective, deliberative decision making about sharing society's burdens that makes actual democracy healthy. They first succeeded in 1978, when conservatives got enough signatures to put an initiative on the ballot to decimate property taxes. Proposition 13 passed, and municipalities suddenly found themselves with a quarter less money to run their schools, fire trucks, sewers, and parks.

Prop 13 was authored by Paul Gann, who went on to form a "grassroots" organization, People's Advocate, that made a specialty of exploiting California's initiative process for conservative ends. The man who runs PA now, Ted Costa, is the author of the Gray Davis recall.

When Costa announced the attempt, less than 100 days after Davis won re-election by a significant margin, the experts greeted the idea the same way they had Proposition 13 in 1978—it was crazy. The loudest included the more centrist Republicans, who immediately turned their backs on the caper as a political distraction.

Soon the "sane" Republicans were able to enjoy what appeared to be a vindication when the recall attempt sputtered into spring, hobbled by a severe lack of funds. For it was, after all, a crazy idea.

The recall was rescued by a rather unconventional man. Darrell Issa, the once obscure congressman from California now notorious for his youthful career as an alleged car thief, infused millions of dollars into the recall drive (earned, naturally enough, in the car alarm business) to get the 897,158 signatures needed to qualify for the ballot. A genuine right-winger—among California Republicans the litmus test is continued support for draconian immigration restrictions, even after the issue turned them into a minority party in the 1990s—Issa felt he had a chance of becoming governor himself in Gray Davis's stead. This is because, thanks to the unusual rules of recall elections, a winner could emerge even if he attracted a very small percentage of the votes.

This was good news for Davis. The better he could convince voters that the recall attempt was what it actually was—a creation of the right-wing fringe—the better the chance he had of surviving. Candidates like Issa made that look easy.

Enter The Arnold.

You might have seen Darrell Issa on television the other day. He was the guy weeping uncontrollably as he announced he was getting out of the race, the day after Schwarzenegger announced that he was getting in.

Gray Davis was not shown crying on TV. But he might have been crying behind closed doors. According to the ideological rules of the game that centrist Democrats helped put in place, Arnold, who expresses tolerant views on abortion and homosexuality even though he all but promised in his opening press conference to turn state government over to the state's business interests, gets to be indelibly enshrined as a "moderate." That renders obvious fringe-dwellers like Issa unelectable. And it makes the prospect of replacing the moderate Davis infinitely more attractive to rank-and-file California voters. ......(The complete Village Voice piece is at http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0333,perlstein,46203,1.html}





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC