Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU Claims It Does Not Have the Resources to Announce it Supports Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 08:40 PM
Original message
ACLU Claims It Does Not Have the Resources to Announce it Supports Impeachment
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/28547

ACLU Claims It Does Not Have the Resources to Announce it Supports Impeachment
Submitted by davidswanson on Fri, 2007-11-09 00:07. Impeachment

"Joel Stedman" dev_js@aclu.org is sending around this form letter:

Dear Friend:

Thank you for your email. I appreciate your taking the time to write and share your concerns, and I am glad to have the opportunity to respond.

I truly appreciate your passion to hold the Administration accountable, and, of course, the ACLU fervently believes, as you do, that Congress should uphold the Constitution. Your choice of action to push for impeachment, however, is not our course of action at this time.

I fully agree with you that the Bush administration has repeatedly overstepped the limits on executive power, shrouded itself in secrecy, eroded our civil liberties and violated the Constitution and its Bill of Rights. The extent of this administration’s contempt for our constitutional freedoms is clear – due in large part to the ACLU’s work exposing its actions through our Freedom of Information Act lawsuits on extraordinary rendition, unlawful detention and the torture and abuse of detainees in U.S. custody; our litigation on issues around warrantless NSA spying, the Patriot Act, and the suppression of free expression and dissent; and our public education and lobbying efforts around violations of human rights and due process rights at Guantánamo Bay, the flawed Military Commissions Act and the restoration of habeas corpus.

It is Congress’ proper role to exercise oversight of the executive branch. The issuance of subpoenas for information about warrantless NSA spying were an important step in the right direction, but we certainly believe—and we will continue to forcefully argue—that Congress needs to do much more. To that end, we launched an ad campaign strongly criticizing the Congressional leadership’s cave-in to the Bush administration. You may view the ad online here: http://action.aclu.org/site/DocServer/BAAAD_ad.pdf?docID=1541.

The ACLU will continue to aggressively fight unconstitutional laws and government actions in the courts and document and publicize constitutional violations and abuses of government power. No other organization is more effective in that arena than ours. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court responded to our unprecedented request to make its secret court orders and legal papers regarding eavesdropping on Americans available to the public by ordering the government to respond. (Our press release is online at http://www.aclu.org/safefree/spying/31356prs20070817.html.) However, given our limited resources and the enormous task of restoring civil liberties where they have been most eroded, the ACLU must focus its staff and resources where we believe that we can realistically make the greatest difference at this time.

Thank you again for writing and for your support of the ACLU. Despite what may be a difference of opinion on this strategy, I hope that the ACLU can continue to count on your support and your inspiring passion, especially at this critical time for civil liberties.

Sincerely,

Joel Stedman

ACLU Correspondence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow and I just renewed my membership
The last time I was a member was during the other Bush. I remember my reason lapsing then was their support of Oliver North. I really think they lack priorities at times.

Of course it's not their job to be behind impeachment-but it is the only natural conclusion to the dismantling of the Constitution by a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's not for them to decide. The constitution did not say wait for
the ACLU. It did not say wait for anybody. It said impeach those that commit High Crimes and misdemeanors. The Center for Constitutional Rights supports the Impeach 07 Campaign.

http://www.ccrjustice.org/about-us/movement-support/impeach-07
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC