Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

S.F. prepares to sue voting machine company

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:20 AM
Original message
S.F. prepares to sue voting machine company
S.F. prepares to sue voting machine company

John Wildermuth, Chronicle Staff Writer

Thursday, November 8, 2007

After a low-turnout election that still might take weeks to resolve, San Francisco is preparing to sue the company that supplied its voting machines.

City Attorney Dennis Herrera filed a notice of default Wednesday, arguing that Nebraska-based Election Systems and Software had breached its contract by selling the city uncertified voting machines and refusing to pay the estimated $300,000 it cost San Francisco to meet special state requirements for counting the vote on the company's machines.

Because of those requirements, which mandate special handling for each of the ballots cast in Tuesday's election, the final results might not be known until Thanksgiving.

"It's a travesty, an absolute travesty," Herrera said at a news conference in front of the City Hall election office Wednesday. "We're in this position for one and only one reason: The election vendor failed to live up to the terms of the contract."

ES&S should either quickly resolve the problems that have plagued the city or be replaced by another company in time for the February presidential primary, the city attorney said.

The company has balked at the idea of covering the city's extra costs for the election. Although Secretary of State Debra Bowen ordered ES&S to reimburse the city, the company said in an Oct. 18 letter that it does not believe the state has the authority to order that payment.

more...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/11/08/BAN2T84D2.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. This company should be barred

from doing business in California at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. A friend of mine in Burlingame

said ALL the voting machines were electronic!!! I asked her why there wasn't just one for handicapped voters. She said there was one, and all the rest were electronic.

Isn't this the opposite of what Debra Bowen said??? There is to be only one electronic machine at each polling station?

WTF is going on? Looks like they pulled the same trick in SF.


:grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC