Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Even Cut 50 Percent, Earmarks Clog a Military Bill (lots of Murtha mentioned)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:22 AM
Original message
NYT: Even Cut 50 Percent, Earmarks Clog a Military Bill (lots of Murtha mentioned)
WASHINGTON, Nov. 3 — Even though members of Congress cut back their pork barrel spending this year, House lawmakers still tacked on to the military appropriations bill $1.8 billion to pay 580 private companies for projects the Pentagon did not request.

snip

The list is topped by the veteran earmark champions Representative John P. Murtha, a Pennsylvania Democrat who is the chairman of the powerful defense appropriations subcommittee, and Representative C. W. Bill Young of Florida, the top Republican on the panel, who asked for $166 million and $117 million respectively. It also includes $92 million in requests from Representative Jerry Lewis, Republican of California, a committee member who is under federal investigation for his ties to a lobbying firm whose clients often benefited from his earmarks.

The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, requested $32 million in earmarks, while Steny H. Hoyer, the majority leader, asked for $26 million for projects in the $459.6 billion defense bill, the largest of the appropriations bills that go through Congress.

As promised when they took control of Congress in January, House Democratic leaders cut in half from last year the value of earmarks in the bill, as they did in the other 11 agency spending measures. But some lawmakers complained that the leadership failed to address what it had called a “culture of corruption” in which members seek earmarks to benefit corporate donors. Earmarks have been a recurring issue in recent Congressional scandals, most recently the 2005 conviction of Representative Randy Cunningham, Republican of California, for accepting bribes from defense contractors.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/washington/04earmarks.html?_r=1&th=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&emc=th&adxnnlx=1194181226-v/xXiXym5e5TlVCVuCkwEQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was never a big fan of Murtha
he is a bit conservative for my tastes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Big Spending Bush Admininstration
R's complain about tax-n-spend liberals.
Bush is a spend-n-spend republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. How many billion for Blackwater
$15 billion? This is just more "they're all the same" nonsense designed to blur the truly obscene and blatant corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC