Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's What I Want

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 05:49 PM
Original message
Here's What I Want
I want the troops out of Iraq in the very near future. No, that doesn't mean the day after taking office but it does mean that my preferred candidate would start making arrangements to withdraw them as soon as s/he took office.

I want universal healthcare. I'm a Brit. We already have universal healthcare here so I don't understand the whole debate about transfer payments, single-payer and so on. I do know that if I'm sick, I can call up my doctor, get an appointment probably on the same day and get a prescription. I take that prescription to the pharacist and I pay £7 (roughly $15) as a contribution to the cost of the drugs, the rest is paid for out of taxes. You guys have the most convuluted, expensive system of healthcare I've ever seen. Our way isn't perfect, there's a crisis over dentistry for example (which is why Brits traditionally have bad teeth) but it is a damn sight better than the "free market uber alles" crowd would have you believe.

I want a candidate who is committed to working with the world, not lording it over the rest of us. Do you guys realise that you are the only nation on earth which, via your mass media, tells the rest of the world on a nearly constant basis, that you are the greatest country on earth? Leaving aside whether that's true or not, does that not strike you as a little fucking obnoxious? To steal a line from Lewis Black, if someone came into your office every day and said "I'm the greatest motherfucker here and all you snivelling shits would die without me", you'd have killed him by the end of the week. So I'd like to see a candidate who realises that leading the world actually means engaging with it, not just ordering it around.

I want a candidate who believes in peace. Really, this should be a no-brainer. You already have two unfinished wars (three if you include the fact that the Korean War never officially ended) and teh current junta is champing at the bit to attack Iran which could concievably trigger World War III. So I'd like to see a candidate who actually says that you will only use your obscenely bloated military when someone actually attacks you. While we're on the subject, climbing down from the permanent wartime economy would probably help too.

I'd like to see a candidate campaign on the issues instead of on personalities. I realise the mass media shares much of the blame on this one but you now have an electoral climate where you select candidates on the basis of whether you like them or not. Is this an election or a reality show?

I'd like to see the USA grow the fuck up regarding sex but I admit there's probably very little a president can do about that.

I want to see happy gay couples getting married. I don't really give a crap about whether you call it "marriage" or something else (here, we call it "domestic partnership" but in all legal respects, it's identical and people have been calling it "marriage" since day one anyway) but restricting the package of legal rights and responsibilities to people who marry someone of the approved gender really is a special right. I can understand restricting it to two people for sheer practicality but if the government can say I can only marry a woman, why can't they say I can only marry certain women, or this woman, or this aardvaark?

I want to see a candidate who recognises that the purpose of government is not to serve business. The US is starting to resemble one of those nightmare nations in cyberpunk novels where the USA has been replaced by the Corporate States of Profit. I'm by no means a socialist but allowing business to run unregulated is a big part of what has caused the other problems on this list (and on this one, we're only two steps behind you).

I want to see a candidate who actually listens to science. Remember that? How many times do we have to listen to someone proclaim that global warming isn't happening or isn't largely caused by humans? On evolution, I can understand the guy who quibbles with the specifics, arguing about the exact timescale or the exact details, that's fine. I can understand the guy who says that God created humans using the evolutionary process, that's my own position. Bot the guy who says the jury is still out on evolution? No, I can't vote for you and I don't think anyone else should. If you can't accept that Darwinian evolution is more-or-less accurate or at least the best hypothesis we have to go on, you're an imbecile.

I'd like to see people actually vote for the candidate they agree with on most of the issues. Remember that? The candidate I agree with on most of these issues is Kucinich. Yes, yes, I know: "I like his positions but he's unelectable". Here's the thing: If everyone who agreed with Kooch's positions actually voted for him, he'd damn well be electable. The late Molly Ivins once said that in the primary, she voted to change the world; in the general, she voted for the lesser evil. That's all I'm asking here. In the general, vote for the Dem candidate or, if you really can't bring yourself to, stay home. I can respect that. But in the primary, forget tactical considerations and vote for the wo/man you agree with on most things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fuckin A.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good Lord, someone responded :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Good post
If you want lots of responses put "fuck" in the title or "Hillary".
If you want at the top of the greatest page, use both in the title. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hear! Hear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. If you don't get a lot of responses to this. .
It's probably because we agree with you, think you stated it well and have nothing to add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That's why my reply was so terse.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. The problem with that
...is that I'm never sure if people think there's nothing to add; have missed the thread or just think I'm crazy as a loon and keep their distance :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. lol. . no loony, you!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. You say "If everyone who agreed with Kooch's positions actually voted for him" he'd be electable
I agree with Dennis, you agree with Dennis, many good liberals agree with Dennis, but the truth is that his positions are also left of where the country is right now.

If we had a candidate with every advantage you could image, and this attractive candidate ran on Kucinich's platform, he still wouldn't win a third of the vote.

My views (and Dennis's) are out of the mainstream. We have to move the mainstream to join us (it'll happen, but it's a slow process) and we cannot begin the process of moving the mainstream until we acknowledge that we're on the outside -- not trying to move into the mainstream but trying to get everyone else to come out here with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I don't believe that.
I believe that the huge majority of ordinary voters are actually to the left of the politicians in D.C. The problem is that they're told that they're not ... and constantly flim-flammed on what those folks are doing. The D.C. beltway seems to be a Political Plantation ... where the millionaires only talk to each other in a big "go along to get along" circle jerk. We're fed a massive mythology leavened with division and blame-shifting. People adopt labels like they adopt professional sports teams ... having almost nothing in common with the players and merely paying their money and dressing up in an insane costume party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. That's why the Republicans are so effective.
Their stance is: Push as far right as we possibly can and let the actual existing left limit us. The strategy of most democrats is "limit ourselves so the right doesn't do it." Their strategy is effective, and ours isn't. If Kucinich gets enough backing his ideas will become mainstream. Some of them won't fly, and I don't back them myself (like slave reparations) but that's not the point...The point is he should push for them and let external forces limit what he can get away with, rather than censoring himself so republicans don't even have to try to push us to the right, we do it to ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Damned straight! Today, we fight. Tomorrow, we fight HARDER.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, that makes two of us.
:hi: And that's exactly how I'll vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. BRAVO!
You said it all, well done.

I'd recommend it twice if I could.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatsMyBarack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. I want all those things, too.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC