Rosenberg sums it up correctly here. There is a very real danger in the strategy of hoping we get Giuliani to run against, given the possibility of a domestic terror attack between now and the general election which he would attempt to manipulate for political gain.
He is also correct to point out that all the "national polls of Democrats" can taken from now until the Democratic Nomination is decided, and it will not change the fact that high percentages(near 50%) of the total voting population 'will never vote for Hillary' in the General Election, and 35% saying the same about Obama.
Edwards is the strongest General Election Democratic Candidate the Democratic Party could field as its nominee, but is currently polled at 3rd among Democrats nationally.
Read the whole piece at the link below.
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/oct/24/romney_best_of_a_bad_bunch"Romney: Best of a Bad Bunch"
By M.J. Rosenberg | bio
Steve Clemons, who I admire, writes that the very idea of Rudy Giuliani as Republican nominee makes him salivate, especially when he considers the group of madmen who advise Rudy on foreign policy. Not me. If I was a praying type, I'd pray that Giuliani is not the nominee.
<snip>
"....I'm just saying that it is dangerous to hope that the absolutely worst Republican gets the nomination. With near 50% of the electorate saying they would not, under any circumstance, vote for Hillary and 35% saying the same about Obama, do we really want to gamble with our future like that?
Fact is, I wish the Republicans had an Eisenhower to nominate. I prefer an election where both candidates are good, decent and smart so that America and the world does not lose no matter who wins.
I still like Jimmy Carter's old slogan, "Why Not the Best?" The idea of "Why Not the Worst?" is terrifying although the "worst" is very possibly what we are going to get."
MORE