Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question: Who was responsible for Rumsfeld and Cheney's rise to power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:21 AM
Original message
Question: Who was responsible for Rumsfeld and Cheney's rise to power
Nixon or Ford? I'm listening to Barry Werth: '31 Days- The Crisis that Gave us the Government we have Today' on CSpan3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Both.
In that order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Thanks
but if Ford had not pardoned Nixon, wouldn't his cronies have scattered into political oblivion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. No.
I had posted a response about this issue at about the same time you were posting this. (See #4)

Both Cheney and Rumsfeld learned a great deal from the Nixon scandals, and our country continues to pay the price for it. But they were among a group that had distanced themselves from Nixon. What impeachment would have done is helped to establish the limits of executive powers expansions -- and it should be noted that the failure to impeach Reagan is what allowed for today's revolutionary presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. If Clinton's JD and Congress had pursued Iran/Contra and BCCI- things would be different
and that's why I do NOT want Clinton(s) as POTUS again.

They won't prosecute or hold these war criminals and traitors accountable.

There won't be investigations.

The full scope won't be known.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nixon
and if we had impeached him, we wouldn't have these bastards today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't see how you figure that
How would impeachment and conviction have stopped the careers of those two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. You're right - they weren't involved in Watergate
Look at all the hacks involved in Iran-contra, some convicted and pardoned, who are still around in government positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Try G.H.W. Bush (Sr.)
who appointed Cheney as Sec. of Defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. "That information is protected by EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE. Smirk." - BFEE
Edited on Thu Oct-25-07 07:51 AM by SpiralHawk
"Only Made Members of our occult cabal are privileged to know such things." - BFEE



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. that is what it seems like the brotherhood of skull and bones
and no one rats on each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Neither of the two
would have been involved or directly impacted by Nixon's being impeached. They did both learn how to distance themselves from scandal during the watergate scandal. More, each of them became focused on the expansion of executive powers, and were fully aware that "war" allowed the best opportunity to do so.

Even if Nixon had been impeached, Ford would have still had the two in his administration. It's worth noting that without a war, both Rumsfeld and Cheney were considered failures in their bureaucratic roles. The myth that they were good at governing is easily exposed by examining their dismal performances in the Ford years.

It is also worth noting that Ford's strength was in the legislative branch, and both Rumsfeld and Cheney -- who each have had some service in this area -- were almost exclusively focused on gaining access for republican corporate interests in the executive branch. That led to their joining forces with the neoconservative movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Thanks H2O Man
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. A lot of impeachment experts disagree with you
Impeachment puts the brakes on many careers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Of those impeached......
Edited on Thu Oct-25-07 11:59 AM by H2O Man
and in Nixon's case, neither Rumsfeld nor Cheney were involved in the Watergate scandals. This is why, for example, that neither is mentioned in the entire Senate Watergate Report.

On edit: PS -- If you could list any impeachment expert who has theorized that impeaching Nixon would have had any impact on either Cheney or Rumsfeld's career, I'd appreciate it. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. David Swanson
I heard him say this at an impeachment forum.

And I heard ELizabeth Holzman (sp?) on AAR speak to this.

Then John Dean was here a month ago and he said it too. The reason we impeach is not so much to hold the president accountable, but to put the brakes on the careers of a lot of underlings. Dean said we absolutely should go after a couple "very evil" people in the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. so if they did not impeach Nixon what makes us think these jerks
Edited on Thu Oct-25-07 07:55 AM by alyce douglas
will impeach *? what a sorry state of affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Nixon faced certain
impeachment, and thus resigned. Ford's pardoning him closed the door on post-resignation criminal convictions. Because there was zero chance of Nixon attempting to serve in public office again, congress did not go forward with post-resignation impeachment (which could only bar him from holding office in the future).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. Reagan and George Bush were not held to account on Iran-Contra. That is where
the ship of state veered off course. They gave us the secret government and its players are in power with this junta.

Everyone should watch Bill Moyers and his program on the Secret Government once a month until they are all in prison.

The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis, by Bill Moyers
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3505348655137118430
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. And now Bill ...
... spends his days riding around in golf carts with the chief architect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I've always found that disturbing n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Valid point but the precedent was set by Ford n/t
I watched that -it was excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Church Lady: "Could it be? SATAN?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. Election Fraud -- 100%
Americans elected Gore, then Kerry.

*Co defrauded democracy...treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's true too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. The Florida 2000 voter purge will go down as the gravest political crime in American history.
And, we need to continue educating the public on this one, lest there are no consequences in out time for such treason and subversion of democracy.

Maybe a special jail/ranch in Crawford TX where they can spend the rest of their lives replanting shrubs, living in tents, and wearing pink :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. well Rumsfeld was Cheney's mentor, but Cheney had always
Edited on Thu Oct-25-07 07:53 AM by alyce douglas
felt that all power should belong to one, and that is the President, Cheney is really fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. What I don't get is that Ford prmoted these men
so I think he was even more responsible. I think I'll order this book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. Cheney
believed that all the power for foreign affairs should be found in the executive office, which is under the authority of the chief executive. It is also extremely important to study the Rumsfeld and Cheney efforts to organize the "shadow government" which would be used in case the US was involved in a nuclear war with the Soviet Union during the Cold War. This planning took place during the Reagan-Bush1 years. The plans were shelved during the Clinton era, but put back in play shortly after Bush2 took office. The plans, which were instituted on 9-11-01, involve an executive "committee" that includes members of the administration not subject to congressional oversight, and business leaders. It does not include the legislative or judicial branch of the federal government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. Primarily Ford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC