Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU Disappointed in Intel Committee FISA Vote, Wyden/Feingold Amendments Slightly Improve Bad Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 09:25 AM
Original message
ACLU Disappointed in Intel Committee FISA Vote, Wyden/Feingold Amendments Slightly Improve Bad Bill
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/32257prs20071019.html


ACLU Disappointed in Senate Intel Committee Vote on FISA, Wyden/Feingold Amendments Slightly Improve Bad Bill (10/19/2007)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: (202) 675-2312 or media@dcaclu.org

Washington, DC – The American Civil Liberties Union is mystified that the Senate Select Intelligence Committee would pass a FISA bill, drafted with heavy input from the Bush administration, which does not protect Americans from intrusive domestic spying and creates a path to immunity for telecommunications executives. However, a small improvement was made as Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI) were successful in including the addition of a requirement that the government get a warrant when it targets an American abroad (such as a missionary, business person or soldier). Now the bill moves to the Senate Judiciary committee.

Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office said, "Congress bowed to the fear-mongering of the administration, yet again. Democrats should not capitulate to the administration. Letting the administration dictate the terms of this legislation once more will only doom us to repeat the disaster of the Protect America Act."

The ACLU will continue to oppose any immunity deal – whether for telecom executives or for administration officials. "The administration is trying to cover its tracks. A dribble of documents provided to Congress is a case of too little, too late," said ACLU Senior Legislative Counsel Timothy Sparapani.

"The ACLU will be working to oppose the Senate legislation unless it is redrafted to include individual warrants for when the government spies on Americans," said Fredrickson. "Being constitutional is like being pregnant – either you are or you aren’t. And this bill isn’t. "

The public agrees with us: a new poll from the Mellman group found 61 percent of Americans in favor of requiring the government to get a warrant from a court before wiretapping conversations U.S. citizens have with people in other countries, and just 35 percent supported warrantless wiretaps.

Pollster Mark Mellman said, "Support for this constitutional right is both deep and wide, cutting across demographic subgroups." Seventy-four percent of Democrats, 60 percent of independents and even 46 percent of Republicans oppose tapping Americans without a warrant.

For more information on FISA, go to:
www.aclu.org/fisa

To read the poll from the Mellman Group, go to:
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/32189leg20071016.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. they're not the only ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. ACLU is doing good work - I donated last week. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC