Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Speaking of the Armenian genocide--notice how Pelosi's cosponsors evaproated away?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:42 PM
Original message
Speaking of the Armenian genocide--notice how Pelosi's cosponsors evaproated away?
Is this skittish behavior from moderate Dems a major reason our leadership appears so weak in its vacillations? Now obviously the blame lies with the leadership in part if they can't wrangle the party, but is it fair to level nearly all criticism at Pelosi when it is at times a few cowardly folks behind the scenes that undermine what should be a tough-minded, solidly critical majority? Or is it essentially at Pelosi's feet anyway as she is the major symbol of our House delegation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. It Was a Very Stupid Idea With Extraordinarily Bad Timing
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 11:45 PM by Demeter
And it proves that Pelosi is in over her head and going down for the third time.

As if another meaningless resolution was going to do anything for the US or the Armenians!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The merits of this bill aside--has behind-the-scenes support evaporation caused other surrenders?
In other words do skittish members of the delegation run away and undermine the party's resolve by denying the needed votes, or does the leadership itself decide to do the running away without this sort of cowardly exodus from less visible Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Probably, because they realize how irrational it is to bring it up now
Americans are not particularly smart as it is, but they aren't that dumb to realize this is a foolish move

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. This thread doesn't intend to discuss the merits of this particular bill
I'm trying to get a handle on the reason for Democratic weakness and vacillation in general--is it primarily a skittish leadership, a skittish portion of the delegation, or some mixture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. It is the reason I gave, because they realize they will get blow back on this
They believe most people will believe this is not a sound resolution at this time

No, I am not arguing the merits of it, I am just giving you the reason why I believe they are backing down


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. This resolution should never have been brought up at this time
It frankly shows the stupidity of the leadership

They won't stop the funding of the war, they won't impeach, but they have no problem bringing up a non-binding resolution that potentially will even make it more dangerous for our troops

Why didn't you bring up this resolution before we invaded Iraq, or when the Democrats had the majority. Why do it when we are up to our ass in aligators?

No common sense

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alofarabia Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think this resolution was a maneuver to stop the war...
by ticking off the Turks enough to stop allowing the US military to ship gas and other items to Iraq. I believe that 70% of all supplies into Iraq arrive via Turkey. Had it worked it could have effectively forced us out of Iraq or at the very least made it extremely difficult logistically. I agree that without this explanation the timing makes no sense. It may have been a novel approach to put pressure to end the war but I'm afraid that it is now coming across as bad political leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Giving the Turks License to Do What They Wanted to Do In the Beginning
when everyone worked so hard to keep them out of meddling in Iraq, more like.

It probably doesn't matter at this point. The Iraq situation is irredeemable. What's one more nation roaming about killing people at will?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. We all had such high hopes for this 2006 Democratic Majority :(
Edited on Wed Oct-17-07 05:04 AM by ShortnFiery
I'll still perservere in voting democratic, but it's almost comical (if it was not for the tragic consequences) how we seemingly have "The Keystone Kops" operating the decision making arm of our Congressional democratic "leadership." :(



OMG, we must not be privy to a multitude of behind the scenes political a**-grabbing ...
well, that is all this "little person" (in more ways than one :silly:) can surmise. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. i think people blame pelosi because she is a figurehead
i dont believe any body votes w.out knowing what the likely outcome is. i think when she decides to vote, now that she has a leadership position, she has to consider the likely outcome.

how long will she have this position, if she tries to get bills passed that never see the light of day?

while an individual politician can be a maverick, i dont think pelosi quite has that chance any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC