Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran Propaganda is Not Just About Attacking Iran. It is Also About Staying In Iraq.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 06:35 PM
Original message
Iran Propaganda is Not Just About Attacking Iran. It is Also About Staying In Iraq.
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 06:38 PM by Hissyspit
Iran Propaganda is Not Just About Attacking Iran. It is Also About Staying In Iraq. It is REALLY about attacking Iran, but it is also REALLY about connecting Iraq and Iran as part of the same project. I imagine others have made this point in other posts, however, I have not seen it, so I wanted to make sure it is recognized.

Invading Iraq was about oil, but it wasn't just about oil, it was about a lot of motivations and intentions - xenophobia, revenge, imperialism, continual war, you are by now familiar with them, some primary, some secondary, all not mutually exclusive. The weapons making their way to the insurgents in Iraq are going to come from a variety of sources. There is a world-wide network of arms dealings that form complex connections and nets, not unlike how it is that you can never necessarily have a good sense of from where your tank of gas came. Similar to the complex relationships, rhetorically queried about tonight by Rep. Maxine Waters in the Iraq War Resolution debate, when she asked "Who are we fighting? Some Sunnis, some Shiites, some Kurds, some Syrians, some Iranians. I don't think the soldiers know. I don't think the administration knows," the complex relationships found within the insurgency and civil war within Iraq.

Republican congressmen and women today have expanded this Iran fear-mongering propaganda into the Iraq War Resolution by connecting Iraq's future with the greater "war on terror" and feared "Islamic Jihadist" expansionism, several of them specifically mentioning Iran.

So similarly to the neo-cons' Iraq intentions and strategy, the timing of the increase in the administration's attempts to connect Iran to the violence in Iraq, to increase the demonizing of Iran and scare the American people, is also about justifying "the surge" and creating a sense that a permanent American military presence in Iraq is critical and necessary. The charges don't need to be confirmed, really, they just need to be put out there to help frame the debate.

No doubt, an air strike or greater strike on Iran is desired by the administration as a continuation of the extremist Neo-con ideological game plan, but what's really going on here is that there are always more than one "what's really going on here"s going on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. i agree completely
i always believed Iran was the real target
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Welcome Bright Eyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Eidelson Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Framing the Debate
Thank you for this analysis.

"...The charges don't need to be confirmed, really, they just need to be put out there to help frame the debate."

And as the President himself once said: "See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda"
(http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/05/2005052 ... ).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome to DU to you, too, Roy Eidelson!
:patriot:

:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. The neocons want the whole middle east, or least those parts they can
profit from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC