Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Al Gore is So Smart... Explain Joe Lieberman to Me....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:50 AM
Original message
If Al Gore is So Smart... Explain Joe Lieberman to Me....
Once again, tell me why? Why did he choose that horses ass as his running mate?

Don't get me wrong, I love Al Gore who was elected by a majority of the people but this is one thing that bugs the holy shit out of me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. His "advisors" and the "DLC" chose him
Probably the same advisors that are going around speaking anonymously about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That kind of begs the question, doesn't it?
Why did Al let his advisers decide for him?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think Al knew that he was surrounded by Judas's n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. The false advisors theory - do you think that he would be liable to make the same mistakes again?
Or has he learned his lesson?

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. "false advisors"
What does that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
33. Its a common theory in history that lets, historically speaking,
peasants excuse failings in the rulers by attributing them to the advisers. "If the king only knew the truth he'd fix these problems immediately." It shows up in fiction a lot as well. See for example the legend of Robin Hood.

In this case - relatively few of us were involved in the decision to select Lieberman (I would venture to guess that none of us fit in that category); we have no way of knowing how much of a role Gore played in it. So we craft a narrative of false advisers to have someone to blame for that blunder while letting our guy off the hook.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Uh...King John was not a good monarch
Don't you think his forced signing of the Magna Carta was due to legitimate grievances?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. No i don't - but there's a distinction between the legend and the reality
The legend of Robin Hood is this - the legitimate king, King Richard, is gone so an illegitimate king is on the throne (King John or Prince John) and does bad things. When the good king comes back, all is corrected - the problem isn't in the system - but in the bad man taking power. So long as you have legitimate kings everything will run great.

This leads to not questioning the system, but rather it supports the system.

Bryant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Let his advisers decide? WTF?
He got their advice, and listened.

IF he was to run again, I doubt he'd hire anyone from that group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. AND I doubt he would listen to anyone
He'd do it all his way this time.
Even how he was going to announce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
35. Hes a Human Being???
They make mistakes. Deal with being a human being please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. I'm in total agreement with this. I don't see this as a blunder that makes me abandon him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. Bingo! ... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Forced on him. Lotta horse-trading & leveraging of power goes on at that juncture.
It's not a decision made by one man alone. Ronald Reagan had G.H.W. Bush forced on him. I forget who exactly it was, or maybe it was a group of honchos, but they said if you want our (powerful) support, take this guy. Don't, and we go elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Two words
Bill...Clinton. Joementum was a bone thrown to the morality police whose panties were in a bind over Clinton's behavior.
Hey - doesn't Joe look like that Star Wars emperor guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
50. That's how I see it too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kennedy got Johnson because they wanted the Southern vote
They didn't even like each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
31. That is the most memorable instance of this sort of thing...
Good call!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Anybody can get bad advice.




His mistake was in listening to the wrong people.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. Simple and easy.
1.Gore needed Florida to win. Florida has the largest population of Jewish voters in the US outside of New York. Gore won Florida so it was a smart choice. (even if it was stolen away)

2.Clinton was caught with his pants down. Everybody knows Lieberman is a "sanctimonious prick." Lieberman was brought in to shore up the morally rigid.

It was a political decision and it was a smart decision, even though everybody knows Lieberman is a sanctimonious prick.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radiclib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
46. Nailed it
Thanks :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Gore didn't choose him.
The DLC did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. then you are saying that Gore is a patsy
Cm'on Gore choose him--Gore wouldn't leave a major decision like VP to the DLC--he is not some kind of patsy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. He isn't a patsy
Balancing the ticket is generally done behind the scenes by the powerbrokers. It's typical business. However, I bet this time will be different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. Worst VP pick ever
Seven years later it's still incomprehensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. It was the anit-Clinton strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. To say that Gore's advisors choose Lieberman is a disservice to Al Gore
who has a mind of his own and wouldn't leave it up to his advisors to choose his VP. He choose Lieberman because "polls" showed that independent voters in particular had "Clinton Fatigue" and were tired of the endless scandals, so VP Gore decided to put some distance between himself and the Clinton's and choose somebody who came down hard on Clinton during "Monicagate" but didn't vote to remove him from office. Also somebody who was considered a "Mr. Clean". Thus Joe Lieberman. Plus he also did it for a historic first--the first Jew nominated by a major party for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. Because he was conservative.
When you're a liberal dem candidate you pick a conservative dem candidate, and vice versa.

It's called balancing the ticket.

Gore's smart enough to know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. That's some
balancing act -- There are plenty of middle of the road people who are not war mongering twits... At least I hope there are.

But I appreciate the answer because I really have a difficult time with this aspect of Gore....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Joe Lieberman wasn't war-mongering in 2000.
And if you blame Gore for that, you're doing some serious monday morning quarterbacking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. Didn't Lieberman have a fairly progressive voting record back then?
And notice I said "fairly".

I also heard he was too much of an insurance company whore for some people's tastes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #28
39. What?
I am not blaming Gore for anything...

I realize that Lieberman could not have been pro Iraq invasion at the time however he was pretty damned supportive of Gulf War I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
30. It wouldn't have been the first time
FDR chose Garner; JFK chose LBJ; Dukakis chose Bentsen. What seems unusual here is that a comparatively *liberal* Southerner chose a comparatively *conservative* Northerner - the other way around is probably commoner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
18. I think his advisors chose Joe to help secure Florida! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
19. Lieberman was a stroke of tactical genius.

At the time, it was near-universally hailed as a good pick, and Al Gore's support increased significantly as a result of it.

Without Lieberman, Gore wouldn't have come even as close to winning as he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. How do you know that?
Perhaps at the time of the VP pick, but the performance given by Lieberman in the VP debates was the worst "debating" I have ever seen in my life.

Dick Cheney is pure evil, nobody should be deferential or even sympathetic to any of his views at all. It certainly didn't help independent voters looking for a difference in candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. bs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
21. that made me sick the day it was announced
I didn't even know much about lieberman - but knew it was a mistake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
24. The Jewish vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #24
42. The Dems traditionally get more than 70% of the Jewish vote
It's one of the most loyal constituencies the Dems have, along with African-Americans. But he may have wanted to make history by putting the first Jew on a major party ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
47. Campaign contributions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
48. Maybe
but isn't that marginalizing Jewish voters? Maybe some Jews vote for a candidate based on nothing more than their heritage. I wonder?

I may sound downright lame here but I am sort of confused. Do people really vote for a candidate based on their color, gender or religious beliefs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. No, for their "looks"
Just kidding. I was making a guess about the Jewish vote because I remember some of the talk going around at the time. But I wondered why Gore had picked Lamerman myself and felt it wasn't a wise choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
26. That always gives me a WTF moment too.
I'm pretty good about giving people the benefit of the doubt at first (embarrassingly, I even gave GW Bush a pass on his speech and mannerisms when he first came on my radar screen; I was fairly apolitical at the time).... but even I knew I was looking a the Devil's right hand Smarm-miester the first time I saw Lieberman interviewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
29. i dont think anyone realized lieberman had this evil gremlin inside him back then.
Edited on Fri Oct-12-07 11:07 AM by bullimiami
i know i didnt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
32. Since when does a candidate choose his own running mate?
I've never heard of such a thing. That's one of the oldest arguments in political history!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
34. The MAIN reason? Because Lieberman went to the Senate floor and admonished Bill Clinton and Gore was
also angry that he was LIED TO by Bill about the blow-jobs. It was his way of distancing himself from Bill. That's it in a nutshell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
41. I'd have to explain 1999 to you.
It happened on a different planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
44. Relations between the Clintons and the Gores were rather frosty at the time
Read this article: White House Civil War
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
45. When you finish explaining Holy Joe, explain Bob Shrum
His record at that point was 0 for 6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. That's what I have problems with.
A good candidate can have a bad VP pushed on him by the powers that by, by political horsetrading. But he still chooses his own advisors, and he chose some who I've never understood. I've never liked the "winning is everything" mindset, but that doesn't mean you have to go out and deliberatly choose losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
51. Everbody can have a bad day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
53. To offset the 'Monica' syndrome, IMO
Lieberman was a vocal critic of Clinton/Lewinsky. He gave Gore some distance from that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. But Lieberman's quotes about clinton
Did he have to come out and say:

"I was disappointed because the president of the United States had just confessed to engaging in an extramarital affair with a young woman in his employ and to willfully deceiving the nation about his conduct."

"I was personally angry because President Clinton had, by his disgraceful behavior, jeopardized his administration's historic record of accomplishment, much of which grew out of the principles and programs that he and I and many others had worked on together in the new Democratic movement,"

I mean, if he would just once say that Bush invading Iraq was based on anything but the truth - Maybe i wouldn't detest the guy so much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Oh, I agree Lieberman was over the top on Clinton
and is a traitor to our party.

It's just an observation about Gore's thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
54. Consultants are idiots
But if it is any consolation, I don't think many consultants would have told Mr. Gore to give the speech he did at Constitution Hall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
55. It was the old Joe L
before he was replaced with an alien look-a-like
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
57. At the time Lieberman was a solid progressive and had not yet become a neocon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. Solid progressive?
He has never been that. He has been a middle of the road republican though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michaelwb Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
59. Easy
Joe-mentum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC