|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
QueenOfCalifornia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:50 AM Original message |
If Al Gore is So Smart... Explain Joe Lieberman to Me.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. His "advisors" and the "DLC" chose him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:53 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. That kind of begs the question, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I don't think Al knew that he was surrounded by Judas's n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. The false advisors theory - do you think that he would be liable to make the same mistakes again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. "false advisors" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:10 AM Response to Reply #13 |
33. Its a common theory in history that lets, historically speaking, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Uh...King John was not a good monarch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. No i don't - but there's a distinction between the legend and the reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Let his advisers decide? WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:02 AM Response to Reply #9 |
20. AND I doubt he would listen to anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #2 |
35. Hes a Human Being??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #35 |
43. I'm in total agreement with this. I don't see this as a blunder that makes me abandon him. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
27. Bingo! ... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. Forced on him. Lotta horse-trading & leveraging of power goes on at that juncture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Red Zelda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
5. Two words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libby2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #5 |
50. That's how I see it too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. Kennedy got Johnson because they wanted the Southern vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #6 |
31. That is the most memorable instance of this sort of thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
7. Anybody can get bad advice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
8. Simple and easy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radiclib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #8 |
46. Nailed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lateo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
11. Gore didn't choose him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. then you are saying that Gore is a patsy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. He isn't a patsy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
12. Worst VP pick ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
14. It was the anit-Clinton strategy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
15. To say that Gore's advisors choose Lieberman is a disservice to Al Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
16. Because he was conservative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. That's some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Joe Lieberman wasn't war-mongering in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #28 |
38. Didn't Lieberman have a fairly progressive voting record back then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #28 |
39. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #16 |
30. It wouldn't have been the first time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
18. I think his advisors chose Joe to help secure Florida! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
19. Lieberman was a stroke of tactical genius. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #19 |
25. How do you know that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #19 |
37. bs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
21. that made me sick the day it was announced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sequoia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
24. The Jewish vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #24 |
42. The Dems traditionally get more than 70% of the Jewish vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #24 |
47. Campaign contributions! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #24 |
48. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sequoia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. No, for their "looks" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Schema Thing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
26. That always gives me a WTF moment too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
29. i dont think anyone realized lieberman had this evil gremlin inside him back then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
32. Since when does a candidate choose his own running mate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
34. The MAIN reason? Because Lieberman went to the Senate floor and admonished Bill Clinton and Gore was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
41. I'd have to explain 1999 to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
44. Relations between the Clintons and the Gores were rather frosty at the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chaumont58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
45. When you finish explaining Holy Joe, explain Bob Shrum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #45 |
52. That's what I have problems with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandrakae (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
51. Everbody can have a bad day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zandor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
53. To offset the 'Monica' syndrome, IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. But Lieberman's quotes about clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zandor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Oh, I agree Lieberman was over the top on Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
54. Consultants are idiots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
55. It was the old Joe L |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
57. At the time Lieberman was a solid progressive and had not yet become a neocon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Solid progressive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michaelwb (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
59. Easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC