Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Frank Wolf going ballistic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:05 PM
Original message
Frank Wolf going ballistic
in the House debate. HaHaHa - please don't leave us out no matter how we treated you. Boohoo. Fugg off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. To quote Billo----Shut up, just shut up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess the pukes aren't to proud to beg...
hahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wasn't the Iraq Study Group his baby?
Wasn't he the one who talked * into taking recommendations from such a group?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. and it was Wolf last night
who wanted to make the ISG a part of this debate-but Baker himself said it's not like it's a fruit salad-ya can't pick and choose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I saw that.
I do remember hearing that a congressman proposed the ISG--and I believe it may have been Wolf. Explains his investment in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It was really interesting wasn't it skid?
I had never seen a rules meeting before.What kind of struck me though was how it was set up with 13 members giving the minority ZERO CHANCE at ever getting any of their ideas adopted.I suspect that could have been a new way they have it set up....oh say from maybe the last 6 years or so..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think that there should be at least two more CSPAN channels,
one for hearings and one for committee meetings, and committe meetings should be broadcast just like our local city council meeting is. We should get to see what these people are doing when they trade off our security, financial wellbeing, the care of the elderly and the ill, and the futures of our young people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. hey I watched the rules committee last night
and Louise Slaughter and Jim McGovern told him and them they already have as many open rules (ONE) as they allowed the dems over the last 2 years of their reign-screw them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I love it
The shoe is on the other foot and they can't stand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. repugs should stop playing the victim card
besides we're using the powers they gave themselves and which we resisted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC