Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many military officials are discreetly acting as partisan PR flacks for the Iraq war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:51 PM
Original message
How many military officials are discreetly acting as partisan PR flacks for the Iraq war?
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/10/colonel-smith-republican/


NorthCom Operations Chief Addresses ‘Republican Assembly’ Events To Push Pro-Iraq War Message

The Tulsa World reports today that Col. Robert P. “Powl” Smith, the chief of operations for the Standing Joint Force Headquarters, U.S. Northern Command, spoke in Tulsa, Oklahoma, yesterday about the Iraq war, advocating that the American public follow the President and stay in Iraq. “We’re there. We’re in the fight, and it’s one we can’t afford to lose. We can’t let the patient die,” Smith said.

While Smith — an active duty soldier — is certainly entitled to his opinions on the war, his choice of venue raises some concerns. Yesterday, he spoke at multiple events sponsored by the Tulsa County Republican Party:

Col. Robert P. “Powl” Smith, a Tulsa native, Iraq veteran and brother of former state Rep. Hopper Smith, will speak twice Tuesday about Iraq and the war on terrorism.

Smith will address the Tulsa County Republican Women at 11:30 a.m. at the Holiday Inn Select.

Smith will address the Tulsa Republican Assembly at 6 p.m. at Johnnie’s Charcoal Grill.

The Hatch Act explicitly prohibits partisan campaign activities by federal employees, whether civilian or military. But “Powl” Smith has a history of making partisan contributions.

In September 2004, just before a major election and while serving in Baghdad, Smith wrote in the Weekly Standard that “we cannot now afford” to leave Iraq. Four weeks before the election, he penned another Weekly Standard column, arguing “the violence in Iraq has a purpose: to influence America’s presidential election“:

In the same way that al Qaeda changed the outcome of the Spanish elections last March with a single catastrophic bombing in Madrid, the enemies of a free Iraq are increasing the tempo of attacks in order to feed the media, and therefore the American people, a steady diet of blood and carnage in order to convince us that “it just isn’t worth it.”

Smith’s writing resembles that of Gen. Petraeus, who also penned an op-ed before the 2004 election that pushed a pro-war message. The case of Col. Smith begs the question: How many military officials are discreetly acting as partisan PR flacks for the Iraq war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. When we saw the VoteVet Ad and one of the participants
had on army fatigues the republicans went crazy, asbsolutely crazy, coulter, rush and on and on. That Patriotic Americans didn't appear in partisan ads. Well so...what do we think about generals and the high brass spouting the republican creed on the Iraq war. Damn here again republicans you can do what you want, but if democrats do the same they are committing treason, and are unpatriotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Hatch Act does not prohibit personal political contributions
This correspondent didn't do his homework.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm more worried about the partisan hacks acting as officers.
Betrayus, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. If you were a Colonel with 10 years to go what will your advancement prospects be?
If you support the current Administration line of continuing bullshit and you've got 10 or 15 years to go to make your 30 its got to be on your mind that you are committing career suicide every time you open your mouth if the Democrats take the Presidency in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC