Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney Not Going To Testify!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:48 PM
Original message
Cheney Not Going To Testify!
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 02:54 PM by Me.
as per MSNBC right now.

On edit: Apparently CNN is reporting Scooter won't take the stand either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm guessing he will resign soon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Really? Why would this be an indication of his leaving/slithering? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Wishful thinking?
If he resigns, he can't be prosecuted? OK- I'm probably wrong about that.

But that would give * the opportunity to put someone in place who will be an "incumbent" candidate. I'm guessing McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. he resigns, Chimpy can pardon him , then Lieberman can pardon
the Chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
47. not even in jest should anyone EVER post that scenario..... LIEberman as prez?
just when you think it can't get any worse... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Lips To Ears
If you get my meaning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yep
I'm sure they want to get someone else into that VP slot asap.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Darth Cheney...
is afraid of burning his hand on the Bible when sworn in to tell the truth...Bummer! It would have been grand to see Fitzie throw holy water on him and watch him squirm and scream "it burrrnnnss!"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is that bad or good for him? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Libbys lawyers think they have won the case and don't need him? Or know they have
the pardon sewed up so don't care? or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. He'd Do More Harm Than Good
He'd have to face Fitzgerald and that could be very bad for the defense. The report said Scooter's lawyers have released him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. How'd he pull that off?
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Blogging at www.firedoglake.com confirms.
Libby won't testify, either. His attorneys released Cheney, who was slated for Thursday, and Libby is taking advice of counsel not to testify.

They are not willing to let Shooter or Scooter undergo cross-examination by Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Yup. Seems to me they're going the appeal and pardon routes.
I really don't think they'll escape a Guilty verdict in this case - on at LEAST three counts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Well I Hope Walton Declines Letting Libby Stay Out Of Jail
during any appeals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. The only basis I've seen them claim for appeal is on the admissability of evidence.
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 03:10 PM by TahitiNut
Walton has ruled presuming, in many cases, that Libby would testify. This would have established the basis for admissability and avoid the hearsay exclusions. Thus, some testimony and documentary evidence hsa apparently goten in that otherwise would not, even though Fitz has been diligent in challenging in some instances. I think a fair Appeals court would NOT reverse - since Libby has gotten more instead of less.

The kind of evidence and testimony admitted has to do with the alleged workload - in terns of the time it consumed and the preoccupation Libby had with other matters. The admissability would then be premised on Libby's own claims regarding his focus ... and (sedondarily) Cheney because Cheney sets the priorities in his role as Libby's boss. When BOTH are eliminated as witnesses, then the admissability presumptions change. I just can't see how anyone can claim Libby didn't get more than he would've otherwise gotten.

Considering this, and considering that Walton would probably understand the "bait and switch" for the evidenciary rulings, I can't see how Walton would grant freedom pending appeal exxcept through an EXCESS of generosity. The "Club Fed" is convenient enough to the court and attorneys that incarceration would be very appropriate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. They'll do anything to keep Cheney off the stand
because the only things he could do under oath is plead the fifth or whine about secrecy and national security. All would be fatal to this administration.

He'd be a terribly bad witness to the defense. His demeanor would ensure Libby's conviction, and so would letting Libby testify on his own behalf.

It looks to me like Libby's lawyer has thrown in the towel, like he knows his client is guilty as sin and is hoping for a last minute plea bargain to end the whole business.

It's too bad his lawyer doesn't see the bigger issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Also
The only way Cheney can help Scooter is by implicating himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Key n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. Fitzgerald is one of the most patient people I've ever seen at work.
What is going on here, H20 Man? Will Cheney skate in your opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Good question.
I think that VP Cheney should face criminal prosecution. I believe that there is enough evidence to warrent his being charged. I never thought that listed him as an unindicted co-conspirator would serve justice. Certainly, there is enough evidence for the House to begin the investigation that should lead to Cheney being impeached. And the Wilson's civil trial will attempt to include Cheney. But I believe that Mr. Fitzgerald owes it to this country to charge VP Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I agree with you in that regard. We must stop recycling these criminals.
That, imho, is a significant consequence of letting them simply sail into the sunset on their yachts. They come back.

It makes me physically ILL that Negroponte is still in any position of power in this government, for example.

Our government is an illustration that the "return of the repressed" is inevitable.

Oh, and have you seen this thread of bobbolinks? I thought you might enjoy the frame. It's still young, though.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x195635

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Libby's defense pretended that they were going to call both of them.
They had Hadley testifying about the so-called serious national security issues that Libby supposedly dealt with on a daily basis and how Libby would forget stuff from briefings. Fitz repeatedly objected to lines of questioning about Libby's "busy and important duties" and the defense basically led the judge to believe that at least Libby would testify - that was to justify the "bad memory" defense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Hannah.
The House should call both Hannah, who testified today on how busy poor forgetful Scooter was, and Hadley, who was told by Tenet to take the Niger reference out of the 10-02 Cincinatti speech, to chat with a committee investigating the OVP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Thanks, H2O Man - I'm terrible with names. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Many people,
myself included, have gotten their names backwards. They are two peas in a pod. There is some significant overlap in their activities, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jollyreaper2112 Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. huh?
So what does this mean? Is this anything like Ashcroft being asked direct questions in congress and refusing to answer? On that one it would have required Rep backing to nail his scrotum to the wall so of course there were no consequences. But this isn't even Congress, this is a trial.


Er, wait, on second thought -- they're both going to be testifyng as defense witnesses? Well, I guess it's their perogative to not take the stand. I wonder how the jury will see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighughdiehl Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. How conveeeeeeeeeeeenient.......
Another Whitewash-I knew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meldroc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. I have yet to hear any indications that Cheney will resign,
though it does look like for now they're throwing Libby under the bus (until the pardon, that is...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Now saying they are letting the jurors go home early due to
federal government shutting down b/c of snow storm. Then said there would be some tapes entered for the defense and the defense rests. Hard to follow but it appears that they are then adjourning until Tuesday(Tuesday!!!?) of next week before instructions and deliberations. Hope I got that wrong. I was thinking Chucklenuts would have Scooter convicted, sentenced and pardoned before the weekend.

Dead Eye dodged a bullet, if he had had to touch a bible I'm thinking it would burst into flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. I suspect that was the plan all along.
But I didn't see it coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Here's a link to the liveblog at FDL
http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/libby-live-tedious-legal-arguments/

Looks like Marcy will get to go home sooner than she thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. So They Really Are Throwing Libby Under The Train
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 02:55 PM by ThomWV
For the good of the cabal, no one will say anything and libby will go to jail.

Good riddance ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. Who is surprised by that?
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 02:55 PM by marlakay
NO way could he testify and tell the truth...answer don't do it...I never thought he would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. Cheney, still getting deferrments..some things never change..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. Of COURSE Cheney won't testify
Cheney thinks he's king of the world. If he refuses to testify, who's gonna make him? :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. He's not refusing to testify
he was a witness for the defense, and the defense has decided they don't want to call him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. too bad what is the reason his mechanical heart can't take it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
28. Team Libby recognizes
that VP Cheney's testimony would help convict Scooter. He would be able to testify on direct that Libby was a very busy man; however, on cross, Mr. Fitzgerald would document what Dick and Scooter were busy doing. That would have included a substantial amount of documents from the OVP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. WTF? I ignore my subpoenas all the time too...
He is subpoened right? That slimy fucking bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Libby's Lawyers Released Him
Wonder what made them do that :sarcasm: ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. Always believed that neither would testify
because the trial was about perjury and obstruction with too much risk for either of them on cross. Too much opportunity for Fitz to bring additional charges. Cheney as a sitting VP would be more like a turtle belly side up on cross and in light of his demeanor with Wolf wouldn't have made it under a Fitz cross.

But it would have been great to see - but it willhappen as the Wilson's go forward with their civil suit.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. It is no surprise, imo, that Cheney isn't going to testify....
He NEVER was, he was simply put on the witness list for show, imo. As for Libby not testifying, given the very strong case put forward by the prosecution, it is the responsibility for Libby's lawyers to advise their client not to testify if they believe, in doing so, he would commit perjury or that his testimony would put him at greater risk for not good purpose.

I think the Libby defense team have advised their client their belief he will likely be convicted and they need to concentrate on planning their appeal/s.

The questions put forward by the jurors today certainly showed they understood the strategy of the defense's case and they were not buying the 'dog and pony show', imo.

From the testimony blogged at firedoglake this morning, note: TYOI = Hannah, he took over Libby's job when Libby resigned and his job was to try and convince the jury that Libby was SO involved in such IMPORTANT national issues that he could forget he knew something as inconsequential the outing of a CIA agent and from whom he first heard about Valerie Plame:


SNIP

Juror Questions

Walton Aside from Libby's difficulty with memory did it lead him to have concerns about his effectiveness?

TYOI Never

Walton When Libby had memory lapses, what was done to trigger recall of things discussed

TYOI He was quite good at remembering ideas and concepts, very bad at figuring out where they came from, how they came to him.

Walton Would Libby deny that you had informed him of these things

TYOI Never


END of SNIP

http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/13/libby-live-john-hannah-two/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
36. Does anybody think Fitzgerald will present a rebuttal prosecution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Don't Know
But am looking forward to his closing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. Another team member
does the closing, then Teddy does his thing, then Patrick Fitzgerald does the rebuttal. It is going to be him responding to Teddy. I can say this, for sure: it will be a powerful presentation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
39. Not Only Are Libby & Cheney Not Going To Testify...
Libby is going to rest his case Thursday.

"Wells: Prior to lunch I indicated to the court that I would be making recommendations to Libby wrt the progress of his case. Over the lunch hour Mr Jeffress and I advised Cheney's lawyer. If we had called he would have been available on Thursday. We have released the VP as a witness. Jeffress and I recommended to Libby that subject to putting on the briefers and some documentary evidence, he should rest following that. After consulting with us and his wife, he indicated he would follow this advice."

http://www.firedoglake.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
45. grumble grumble grumble
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC