Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Psych Study: Real personality diffs between Libs & conservatives:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:32 AM
Original message
Psych Study: Real personality diffs between Libs & conservatives:
Most people are surprised to learn that there are real, stable differences in personality between conservatives and liberals—not just different views or values, but underlying differences in temperament. Psychologists John Jost of New York University, Dana Carney of Harvard, and Sam Gosling of the University of Texas have demonstrated that conservatives and liberals boast markedly different home and office decor. Liberals are messier than conservatives, their rooms have more clutter and more color, and they tend to have more travel documents, maps of other countries, and flags from around the world. Conservatives are neater, and their rooms are cleaner, better organized, more brightly lit, and more conventional. Liberals have more books, and their books cover a greater variety of topics. And that's just a start. Multiple studies find that liberals are more optimistic. Conservatives are more likely to be religious. Liberals are more likely to like classical music and jazz, conservatives, country music. Liberals are more likely to enjoy abstract art. Conservative men are more likely than liberal men to prefer conventional forms of entertainment like TV and talk radio.
<..>
As kids, liberals had developed close relationships with peers and were rated by their teachers as self-reliant, energetic, impulsive, and resilient. People who were conservative at age 23 had been described by their teachers as easily victimized, easily offended, indecisive, fearful, rigid, inhibited, and vulnerable at age 3. The reason for the difference, the Blocks hypothesized, was that insecure kids most needed the reassurance of tradition and authority, and they found it in conservative politics.

The most comprehensive review of personality and political orientation to date is a 2003 meta-analysis of 88 prior studies involving 22,000 participants. The researchers—John Jost of NYU, Arie Kruglanski of the University of Maryland, and Jack Glaser and Frank Sulloway of Berkeley—found that conservatives have a greater desire to reach a decision quickly and stick to it, and are higher on conscientiousness, which includes neatness, orderliness, duty, and rule-following. Liberals are higher on openness, which includes intellectual curiosity, excitement-seeking, novelty, creativity for its own sake, and a craving for stimulation like travel, color, art, music, and literature.

The study's authors also concluded that conservatives have less tolerance for ambiguity, a trait they say is exemplified when George Bush says things like, "Look, my job isn't to try to nuance. My job is to tell people what I think," and "I'm the decider." Those who think the world is highly dangerous and those with the greatest fear of death are the most likely to be conservative.

Liberals, on the other hand, are "more likely to see gray areas and reconcile seemingly conflicting information," says Jost. As a result, liberals like John Kerry, who see many sides to every issue, are portrayed as flip-floppers. "Whatever the cause, Bush and Kerry exemplify the cognitive styles we see in the research," says Jack Glaser, one of the study's authors, "Bush in appearing more rigid in his thinking and intolerant of uncertainty and ambiguity, and Kerry in appearing more open to ambiguity and to considering alternative positions."
snip

much more at: (also has click-thru to original article in this month's Psychology Today)

http://theangryliberal.blogspot.com/2007/02/last-december-i-wrote-about-study-that.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. small wonder i love liberals.
did someone mention books? art? travel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, my place is a mess
loads of books, Picasso prints, Classical and jazz CDs. Guess they got me to a 'T'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Guess I'd make a lousy politician. I like to see
both sides of any issue. Because of my dyslexia, I have taught myself to be organized but basically I'm kind of a slob. Like if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Conservative= easily victimized, easily offended, indecisive, fearful, rigid, inhibited...
Yup. Sounds like them to me.
Kicked and recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. What's creepy is that they are like that at 3 -- and never get over it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Queen of the pack rats here
an entire wall of books of which I can's find one when I'm looking for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Fear as basis of conservatism
That seems to be what the study says. In light of *'s fear-mongering, the youngest generation of Americans may turn out to be very conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yup. Them damn libruls read too many books to suit me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. The statement on books really jumped out at me. I know people
who don't have any printed material in their homes. No books, no magazines, no newspapers, nothing (unless you count the Bible and religious tracts)! They are invariably conservatives who have gotten their opinions from church or talk radio. In both cases they are given their talking points and all they have to do is repeat them with no real thought required. They don't, or won't, expose themselves to other points of view for fear of being proved wrong or hearing something that they don't want to know. So they stay in their safe little shell and let others (their leaders) do all their thinking for them. Much easier that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Hi to you, Arkansas Granny. Nicely done post there. Thank you.
A lot of fundamentalists and/or conservatives are just as you paint them. They don't want to be bothered with the facts.

"And that durn Darwin fella -- he's just a smarty-pants know-it-all tryin' to stir up trouble!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Yeah, when we bought our house out in the sticks several years
ago, I was astounded that the gorgeous built-in bookcase (with room for TV and VCR) which nearly covered one large wall, and another smaller one in the same room, had nary a book in them!! Not even a cookbook anywhere. Unbelievable. And yes, these people were very church-going Christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. My favorite Bill Hicks routine: "What'cha readin' for?" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. One of their achilles heels--Freepers are violently insecure about their inability to read nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Many Bush supporters just evidently couldn't bring themselves to
the critical thinking stage. It would have involved public radio news analysis, or the op-ed page of their paper, or --and forbid it Almighty God -- a TRIP TO THE LIBRARY.

The poor dears. We ask so MUCH of them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. I never really thought about it, but that explaination sounds close
towhat I've seen too. Another thing I've seen with real STRONG Pubs is that they are always looking for what they call a "strong leader" or authoritarian type. Sort ofa "you tell me what to do ad I'll do it" mentality, while my Dem friends are always looking for a BETTER WAY to do things, and a "Give me some options and I'll tell you what I THINK IS BEST".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. How easy we are to manipulate - snip from the article *sigh*

<snip>

...even a subtle shift was enough to tip the balance of the Presidential election, and the direction the country took for years. "Without 9/11 we would have a different president," says Solomon. "I would even say that the Osama bin Laden tape that was released the Thursday before the election was sufficient to swing the election. It was basically a giant mortality salience induction."

<snip>

To test this, Solomon and his colleagues prompted two groups to think about death and then give opinions about a pro-American author and an anti-American one. As expected, the group that thought about death was more pro-American than the other. But the second time, one group was asked to make gut-level decisions about the two authors, while the other group was asked to consider carefully and be as rational as possible. The results were astonishing. In the rational group, the effects of mortality salience were entirely eliminated. Asking people to be rational was enough to neutralize the effects of reminders of death. Preliminary research shows that reminding people that as human beings, the things we have in common eclipse our differences—what psychologists call a "common humanity prime"—has the same effect.

<snip>

The solution, then, is remarkably simple. The effects of psychological terror on political decision making can be eliminated just by asking people to think rationally. Simply reminding us to use our heads, it turns out, can be enough to make us do it.

(emphasis added) direct link to article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lilymidnite Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. who gave them the key to my house?
hmm, books on every topic, abstract art, travel documents ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. fits in with Dean's book too. It's an illness I tell ya! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. To all the lurking conservatives:


Ha Ha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. For cool! What is is it?
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 01:23 PM by badgerpup
Did you make it?
:wow:
Those colors just woke up my eyes...snow is nice to look at, but gets a bit repetitive after a while...;)


edit...spellcheck is my friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. Abstract Art, a conservative favorite.
It's very bright, but not quite as bright as in the photo. I cranked up the saturation for the conservative audience. :evilgrin:


It's a painting of the foodchain,life itself. The very bright colors represent the beauty in nature such as sunsets, foliage, flowers, oceans, ect. The imagery represents the other side of nature; one thing eats another thing in an endless chain of gore. It's the duality of life. So much beauty. So much horror.

I did paint it and it is a very large painting. 48" x64"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. It's beautiful work.
Made me stop scrolling and stare for a good long time. Thanks for sharing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Thanks.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. Most of the conservatives I know are slobs
Although it is true that they are fairly simplistic slobs. Beige slobs. Their home furnishings center around a TV and a Lazyboy. They never dust. They have very few books and papers so that cuts down on the clutter. (They don't read much.)

They tend to have a lot of empty beer cans lying around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hashibabba Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
15. OK, OK, I admit it....
I must have been a republican when I was three.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. It reminds me of when the teachers went out on strike
in my parish in 1988. (BTW, we are one of only 5 educational systems in Louisiana which won the right to bargain our own work contract.) Anyway, the teachers who refused to strike for better working conditions were the ones who felt the need to feel "secure" under the current conditions, were the ones who felt that the school board "knew better" about the educational policies, were the ones who wanted a dictatorial-type administration in their schools, were the ones who wanted efficiency above fairness, were the ones who were content to stay as a dominated drone --- drones don't have to feel threatened, insecure. It was an eye opener to see which of my teacher friends went on strike, and which ones refused. Needless to say, I can now see exactly which ones are Libs and which ones are conservatives. What dull, stepford lives they must lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonathan50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. OK, I fit several of the criteria, but this might be interesting to some of you.
The Myers Briggs Type Indicator or MBTI is a test which determines which of sixteen basic personality types one fits into.

http://www.personalitypathways.com/type_inventory.html

On the MBTI I'm an Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Perceptor or INTP

Here is a quote from the most comprehensive description of the INTP on the web:

http://www.intp.org/intprofile.html

When an INTP lives alone, his home is usually spartan and utility-oriented. There will be little or no decorative objects, electronic equipement will be in abundance and the importance of any object will depend only on its usefulness. The general style of the home is largely irrelevant. When an object is put aside, not to be returned to for a while, it will lie fully ignored until used again. Objects which lie unmoved for more than about 48 hours usually become invisible to the INTP, until such time as he has a use for them again. For other temperaments whose need for tidiness and order in a house is strong, this lack of concern in this area may seem despairing. For the INTP, however, no problem exists. Corners of rooms, table tops and cupboards may become cluttered with objects, but while they don't move they remain effectively invisible and are unimportant. Indeed, less mature INTPs have a reluctance to move objects at all, for the desire to remain detached and not physically interact with the world can be strong. The one thing that will force an INTP to tidy his home radically, even when alone, is when the clutter eventually gets in his way and hinders some activity. Often, however, the offending objects will merely be moved into another corner where they can spend some more weeks being invisible. When an INTP lives with a partner and perhaps has a family, he learns the necessity of focussing on the details of tidiness. This is not usually difficult, since tidying a house is an activity which can be clearly defined and, hence, the INTP can focus on it by treating it as systematic work.

This describes me almost perfectly. And BTW, I do have a family.

I guess that makes me a liberal. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankenforpres Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. i am also intp but...
i am just barely an i, and just barely a t. strong n and strong p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. I definitely feel better now
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. My house nearly collapsed due to having so many books.
I've got more than 2,000 books, I am sure, and over a thousand classical and jazz CDs and LPs... and the house is FULL of art, from abstract to tribal/folk art.

BUT, I do know a freeptard whose house is messier and dirtier than the inside of a dumpster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. I have blogged about this numerous times
it really is no secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. Liberals won't beat the crap out of you if you are different...
Racism and bigotry are pillars of conservative thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. Seems that I'm a bit of both
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vektor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
27. Mostly on the mark - but I'm an orderly neat freak.
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 01:23 PM by Vektor
I've got to have my house clean, neat, well lit, and minimalist and structured in its decor - otherwise I lose my mind. Clutter makes me crazy.

I do like warmth and color, though and the other stuff describing liberals pretty much suits me.

But yeah, I'm a totally rigid, structured neat freak when it comes to my home and surroundings.

Edited to add: I do have a great number of books, many of them about travel, art, and exotic cooking. I also dabble in abstract painting, but I just keep it all really fanatically organized.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
30. Well Duh.....
All you have to do is listen to a conservative talk show to understand they are wired differently...

And you can see it in any upscale suburban area...

Privledged people who are self absorbed and wonder through life thinking it really is all about them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
31. I must be a liberal
My blue and purple computer room looks like a bomb went off in it. I have magazines and books everywhere and NASCAR posters all over the wall. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. There's another difference I've noticed
between liberals and conservatives, but it's not scientific, just based on my own experiences. Conservatives tend to have a mean streak in them. How else could they be against social programs which help the needy? That's the reason they deeply love tax cuts, if it means more money for them, then screw the children, the disabled, the elderly, the veterans. Liberals, on the other hand, feel that society is improved when all have the opportunity to be assured of a safe, warm place to live, food, medical care, and a chance to live a life of dignity.

To me, it seems that the more needy people a country has, the more unstable and unsafe that country will be. Liberals feel the same compassion for those in other countries, too. For example, we care about the death of innocent Iraqis, about the wounded, and the ones living in poverty and fear. Conversations I've overhead between conservatives make it clear that they don't give a rat's ass how many foreigners are killed, or made miserable by our actions, because we're AMERICANS, and should be able to do as we damn well please.

That's why this travesty of a budget Bush submitted is so repugnant, it calls for keeping the wealthy's tax cuts permanent, and calls for deep cuts in programs to help the poor, or middle class. That's cruel, and the more conservative the person, the crueler they can be, at least in my humble opinion. Conservatives are also boring, because they can't discuss anything really worthwhile, they either want to brag about themselves, or complain about how gays are ruining the country, or about how victimized they are by not being able to impose their religious views on others. All in all, conservatives are just a nasty bunch of people, which a vicious mean streak, and Bush is a good example of what they tend to be like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Yes. Mean and money/materialistic oriented
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. Left brain v right brain to oversimplify--or dominance vs tolerance, ego vs superego
There's definitely some split in the human brain, that has always existed, that our current leaders are just learning how to exploit.

Divide and conquer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
37. It's belief people v. knowledge people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
41. I must be liberal. Cleanliness has never been my strong point.
I should forward this article to my mom, heh heh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
42. Well, that settles it!
Democracy is for liberals--
Liberals ... are "more likely to see gray areas and reconcile seemingly conflicting information...more open to ambiguity and to considering alternative positions."

Totalitarian dictatorships are for conservatives--
Conservatives..."have less tolerance for ambiguity...more rigid in <their> thinking and intolerant of uncertainty and ambiguity."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
44. Can you say "anal retentive", children?.. I knew you could ! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
45. the study shows that liberals are better than convervatives
in every way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
46. Maybe brain-damaged as well
The parts of the brain that process information like "How would I like it if somebody did that to me?" function intermittently or not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC