Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CONYERS Demands Secret DOJ Torture Memos-WH Denies They Exist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 12:42 PM
Original message
CONYERS Demands Secret DOJ Torture Memos-WH Denies They Exist
House Panel Demands Secret DOJ Torture Memos
By Spencer Ackerman - October 4, 2007, 11:54AM

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) and subcommittee chair Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) today demanded the Justice Department release secret legal opinions from 2005 and 2006 that The New York Times described today as "an expansive endorsement of the harshest interrogation techniques ever used by the Central Intelligence Agency."

The opinions, authored by acting Office of Legal Counsel head Stephen Bradbury, had been previously unknown until the Times wrote about them this morning -- even to the committee. And they were penned even as the Bush administration was publicly renouncing torture.

"Both the alleged content of these opinions and the fact that they have been kept secret from Congress are extremely troubling, especially in light of the Department’s 2004 withdrawal of an earlier opinion similarly approving such methods," Conyers and Nadler wrote. They also demand that Bradbury -- who has never been confirmed by the Senate despite serving as OLC chief for years -- testify about his justifications for such techniques as waterboarding. You can read their letter to acting Attorney General Peter Kiesler here.

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004380.php

..........

White House press secretary Dana Perino, however, denied that report today.

"This country does not torture," she told reporters, according to the Associated Press. "It is a policy of the United States that we do not torture and we do not."

"Asked about the story Thursday, Perino confirmed existence of the Feb. 5, 2005, classified opinion but would not comment on whether it authorized specific practices, such as head-slapping and simulated drowning," AP continued. "She said the 2005 opinion did not reinterpret the law."

Perino insisted the 2005 memo was not inconsistent with a 2004 opinion from the Justice Department declaring torture "abhorrent."

"We know that these are ruthless individuals who will do anything, and that they're very patient; that they'll do anything to try to carry out their attacks," Perino said. "And this president has put in place -- all within the foursquare corners of the law -- tools in the global war on terror that we need."

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/NY_Times_Severe_interrogation_techniques_are_1004.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. nothing short of impeachment will have any effect on these rabid madmen.
Edited on Thu Oct-04-07 12:45 PM by bullimiami
and it may not work either.


oh. they dont exist 'now', they shredded them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ask Judge Bybee he knows he wrote them
Edited on Thu Oct-04-07 12:46 PM by seemslikeadream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jump up and down, piss and moan. You have as much chance of
seeing the documents as I do getting to the moon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC