Any attention given Rather's explosive charges about newsmedia protecting Bush?

[blm]

Nothing from what I have seen on any of the Sunday morning shows.

Nothing on Cspan.

Not even Reliable Sources so far, where you would EXPECT this story to be a key focus.

[librechik]

1. nope--they're busy protecting Bush

and ridiculing Hillary's laugh.

[orpupilofnature57]

2. MSM has been Shrubs best freind since Poppy.

http://tomflocco.com/Docs/63/BushJfkBookDepo.htm

[blm]

11. They didn't buy up control of most broadcast media in the 80s and 90s for nothin'

And they've been manipulating the print media and bending it to their agenda the same way.

[BobRossi]

3. And the attention would come from......

The very same folk that Rather implicates? Don't hold your breath.

[blm]

5. Of c ourse - but all we can do is keep shining OUR flashlights on them until

ANYTHING BIGGER comes along.

And THAT is the purpose of this thread. So they know that not all of us are swayed by their inattention.

[bullimiami]

4. by explosive to you mean pointing out the obvious. blatant cowtowing?

the media cant see past bush's beautiful suit of gold.

[blm]

7. I only see him naked - just as I saw his father and his fascist pals for years.

.

[Benhurst]

9. Oh, dear God! The very thought makes me sick. I won't be able to sleep for weeks.

:rofl:

[blm]

10. Heh - naked as I never saw them wearing the cloak of American patriotism or

the mantle of humanity.

I only saw raw, naked fascism.

[acmavm]

6. I would have thought this would be something 'our' candidates would

have mentioned. I mean, it was only one of the biggest stories in the country and it was buried by those who had an obligation to cover it. Instead of lying for bush** like they did during the 2000 campaign, they had an opportunity to right the public record.

Our candidates need to start speaking up about the crimes of this administration.

[blm]

8. Rather reveals that MAJOR MEDIA was protecting Bush for 2004 and no one wants

to touch it at ALL?

Amazing, eh? But then, if they acknowledge the truth the Dem powermongers couldn't put all the blame on Gore and Kerry as they have been doing and getting away with it. THEIR stewardship of the party would finally get the focus it deserved for its many failures.

They KNOW the election fraud was rampant and the media an ENORMOUS problem for Democrats, but fixing THOSE problems as a party effort would have meant a Dem would be in the White House - a Dem named Gore or Kerry. Hillary2008 did NOT want that to happen.

[Kelly Rupert]

12. Results 1 - 10 of about 7,264 from Sep 23, 2007 to today for "dan rather." (0.34 seconds)

I'd say yes.

[blm]

13. Oh yeah - ALL the Sunday shows have been talking about nothing else, eh?

Gee - coming to the conclusion you really LOVE and PROTECT the system that's been set up these last two decades.

[Kelly Rupert]

14. You asked if the media were covering it,

not if several shows in particular had dedicated a certain day's programming to it.

[blm]

15. Mainstream media, especially the high visibility shows.

But you knew that.