Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Clear Channel rise above hypocrisy and condemn Rush for his remarks?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:19 PM
Original message
Will Clear Channel rise above hypocrisy and condemn Rush for his remarks?
Senate Democratic Leaders To Call On Clear Channel To Renounce Limbaugh's Attack On Our Troops

Remember when Clear Channel banned the Dixie Chicks because they criticized Bush:

Dixie Chicks axed by Clear Channel

<...>

"Just so you know," Texas native Maines said on stage, "we're ashamed that the president of the United States is from Texas." Maines added she felt George W. Bush's foreign policy is alienating the rest of the world.

Her remark unleashed a nationwide backlash. The group's records have been pulled by dozens of country-music stations across the country, including two Clear Channel-owned stations in Jacksonville, WQIK 99.1-FM and WROO 107.3-FM.

"Out of respect for our troops, our city and our listeners, (we) have taken the Dixie Chicks off our playlists," said Gail Austin, Clear Channel's director of programming for the two Jacksonville stations.

That's a big leap in logic, said media expert Dennis Stouse, a Jacksonville University professor and chairman of the school's department of communications. "It doesn't have anything to do with our troops or our city."

<...>

Maines apologized for the remark last Friday. However, Clear Channel confirmed Tuesday the group's music is still not being aired by either station.

link


Clear Channel's actions were clearly political:

|Seeing Through The Fog of Clear Channel

<...>

If Clear Channel's leadership wasn't so historically close to the Republican government and if Michael Powell didn’t lead the FCC, these comments may not have seemed too controversial, especially in light of the topics normally covered on Stern’s show. Clear Channel CEO Lowry Mays is a staunch Republican and Bush supporter. Mays and Clear Channel are major contributors to Bush’s campaign. When the elder George W. gave Texas A&M his presidential library, Mays, one of the school’s regents, became a major donor. The elder George W. and Mays also shared a stage when they were both inducted into the Texas Business Hall of Fame in 1999. (Boehlert)

Tom Hicks, a Clear Channel board member, is a major Bush donor who has been greasing George W.’s palms since the 1990s. As the governor of Texas, Bush privatized the $13 billion of financial assets of the University of Texas and put them under the control of Hicks. In exchange, Hicks hooked up Bush supporters with investment deals, and bought the Texas Rangers from a group of investors that included Bush, earning Bush $15 million of his initial investment of $605,000. (Boehlert)

The head of the FCC, Michael Powell, was appointed by the current president and is the son of Secretary of State Colin Powell. Michael Powell has never seen a merger he didn’t like, and has pushed deregulation even further than the 1996 Telecommunications Act that helped Clear Channel become one of the biggest media companies in America.

<...>

Clear Channel has the ability to control programming on their stations, and to regulate who gets on and who doesn't. The Chicago Tribune and Salon.com released a "banned playlist" of songs Clear Channel radio DJs were told not play following the Sept. 11 disasters. Over 150 songs were on it, including John Lennon's "Imagine," Louis Armstrong's "What A Wonderful World," and R.E.M.'s "It's the End of the World (As We Know It). The company even banned the Dixie Chicks from being played after their anti-Bush statements regarding the Iraq war. The company then organized pro-war rallies, called "Rallies for America," where people crushed Dixie Chicks cds, held up signs about the damn liberals and cheered for the war. (Barrett) Even though it was the first time in the history of the United States that a broadcasting company had sponsored a pro-war rally, it may not have surprised the Republican-controlled FCC.

link


Will Clear Channel rise above hypocrisy and condemn Rush for his remarks "out of respect for out troops?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't hold your breath on this one. Clear Channel and the BFEE give
each other reach arounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. No
He makes them tons of money so there is no way they are going to condemn limbaugh. I bet they'll say "His opinions do not neccessarily represent those of Clear Channel". If they say anything at all, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. ClearChannel is going private
Merging with the group that Mittens used to run and probably still has a stake in, the Bain group. Ergo, they could give a shit. People who believe Rush is a god and who make up 99% of his audience see no problem. And those are the ones who will buy the diets and the hair restorers he pushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC