Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEDS SAY NEW JERSEY WATER STANDARDS DO NOT PROTECT WILDLIFE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 04:44 PM
Original message
FEDS SAY NEW JERSEY WATER STANDARDS DO NOT PROTECT WILDLIFE
original-peer

For Immediate Release: September 25, 2007
Contact: Carol Goldberg (202) 265-7337

FEDS SAY NEW JERSEY WATER STANDARDS DO NOT PROTECT WILDLIFE

Bald Eagles, Falcons, Mussels and Others at Risk from Mercury, DDT and PCBs

Trenton — New Jersey’s latest stab at water quality standards does not pass federal muster because it leaves bald eagle, peregrine falcon, freshwater mussels and other aquatic life vulnerable to the effects of mercury, the pesticide DDT and the toxic effects of PCB’s, according to formal comments filed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). The state has been on notice of the need for numeric chemical limits to protect wildlife since 1996 but has once again failed to address the issue in its proposed new Surface Water Quality Standards.

Even extremely low levels of these persistent pollutants in state waters have devastating impacts on fish and wildlife as they bio-magnify and accumulate up the food chain. As mandated by the federal Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act, the state is required to assure that its water quality standards are protective of all federally protected species and their habitat.

The latest salvo comes from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in a July 23, 2007 letter to the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The letter contends that –

* The “existing numeric State of New Jersey Quality Standards remain unprotective for mercury and DDT”;
* For “wildlife protection, attainment of New Jersey’s numeric PCB standard is stalled due to implementation issues that need clear and decisive resolution…”; and
* “The USEPA and the State continue to be in noncompliance with the Service’s <1996> Biological Opinion and may be vulnerable to legal challenges.”

“New Jersey is again proposing new water quality standards that ignore impacts on wildlife —how lame is that?” asked New Jersey DEP Director Bill Wolfe, a former DEP analyst, “For more than a decade, the state DEP has ignored federal law but the feds have yet to do more than write nasty letters.”

Today, PEER sent a letter calling on USEPA to enforce the Clean Water act in New Jersey by either adopting federal standards to protect wildlife or leveraging federal funding to induce recalcitrant state officials to do so.

“In New Jersey, it is really the petrochemical industry and polluters - not the DEP - who set the agenda for water quality standards,” Wolfe added. “It shows how low New Jersey has sunk when even the Bush administration righteously takes us to task for lack of water pollution controls.”

###












complete release including links to related sources here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. A friend of mine once sued the EPA
for its failure to enforce its own water quality regulations in NJ. He won, and was subsequently hired by the EPA as a water enforcement attorney. This was more than 20 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC