Really sorry to meet you this way. But, I have decided to, as you put it "agree to disagree with you" about this issue. Is that OK with you?
Assuming that the statements of a complete stranger to me (i.e., you) are true, I still say that by placing yourself into
a category in which your stated actions show you do not belong you deliberately sow confusion and take a weapon from the hands of those who fight America's descent into slavish acceptance of the police state.
Please tell me, did anyone on this board post directly in response to you and call you that as an insult? Or are you just offended that someone, somewhere on this board could be accused of that? Please give me some context to interpret your post, as I have not seen your posts before.
you say:
...ought to be adult enough to agree to disagree—and not be called Good Germans—or wacko anarchists, or stupid, or uniformed, or trolls, or apologists, or enablers, because they have an opinion--regardless how uniformed and and stupid you or I think it may be--that differs from our own.
Spare me the naivete. There are more passive aggressive ways to "agree to disagree" without really doing it than there are dollars in the National Debt. And they are all in use on DU.
This board is awash in provocation, infiltration, and just plain bad blood from the unending candidate wars. The moderators are swamped refereeing fights. And you say that everything will just work out if people don't use the phrase "Good German". What is this, some new version of PC? Thou shalt not put a shorthand label on authoritarian behavior because that can't possibly show itself at DU. (Obligatory response to inevitable comment: saying that authoritarian behavior can exist is no excuse to call me an authoritarian.)
Once again, sorry to have to show up this way. But I strongly disagree with your condemnation of any use whatsoever of the well-defined phrase Good German. Who it gets applied to is a completely different argument, which applies to any word.
arendt