yeas 72 nays 25 FUCK IT

[spanone]

F U C K I T

[Vincardog]

1. ?

[spanone]

3. John Cornyn amendment to give MoveOn.org a condemnation for their ad

[orleans]

12. condemnation? what's that? saying naughty naughty? fuck everyone

who voted for this.

and as long as it doesn't prevent moveon ads in the future from appearing in a newspaper then it's just the pukes blowing more smoke up everyone's ass.

[spanone]

26. yes it is, and another shining example of the weakness of the democratic party

[robinlynne]

146. the pukes and half of the democrats.

[MzNov]

142. These stupid bastards wouldn't pass a condemn W resolution

for massive war crimes, but hell yeah, they'll be all bipartisan for condemning an organization that SPEAKS THE TRUTH.

This is more unbelieveable than all the mountains of other unbelievable stuff from these criminals and brain dead Senators.

At least Boxer didn't vote for it. and 3 cheers for Pete Stark.

[Trisket-Bisket]

7. Me too.

????????????????????

[Solly Mack]

2. Honestly...did you expect anything different?

Yeah, I know that doesn't make it any less maddening

[spanone]

4. yes, but i 'm a hopeless romantic.....

[budibudinski]

5. Moveon.org should take out another ad about Freedon of Press &

Speech.
Moveon.org should state it clearly.

[malaise]

15. I hope they do n/t

[halobeam]

17. Absolutely!

They are the voice of the people, NOT THE VOICE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. Today that become most obvious.

[bdamomma]

28. definitely,

this is BS.

[Fleshdancer]

55. I agree 100% eom

[TwilightGardener]

6. Well, all it does is say they condemn the ad. Just a political maneuver--it

doesn't change anything. If you want to be heartbroken, be heartbroken over Webb-Hagel or Levin-Reed.

[spanone]

9. no, but it certainly shows how little power the democrats truly wield.

and it will be the headline

[paulk]

82. maybe they didn't think this was worth wasting any time over

The Senate has real business to attend to. Maybe the Democrats who voted yes are aware that supporting MoveOn is not a good political move with the consituency that put them in office. Maybe you're making a mountain out of a molehill.

[simmonsj811]

89. WEL

IT DIDN'T HAVE TO COME UP FOR A VOTE RIGHT???

[paulk]

97. it was an amendment to a bill

so, yes, those get voted on....

[spanone]

101. they wasted half a day

[budibudinski]

10. ..so what exactly does this amendment do to stop Moveon from

future ads such as this..what are the rethugs gonna do?

[TwilightGardener]

It does absolutely nothing. It's political fluff. Don't make too much out of it.

[Maraya1969]

75. And while they're fluffing another soldier dies......................

[sicksicksick_N_tired]

32. Nothing. The RW just likes to revel in a bunch of whiny bs over truthful exposures. n/t

[Flarney]

66. MoveOn should just run the same damn ad again. n/t

[The Count]

74. Good luck getting NYT to publish it - they already scared THEM as well.

[The Count]

14. All it does is become the ad police. decide who should shut up. Prelude for

declaring Moveon illegal.

[TwilightGardener]

24. No--get some perspective--it just says the sense of the Senate is

that it doesn't agree with the ad. That's all. MoveOn can still run all the ads it wants.

[The Count]

71. Since when is the government's opinion on advertisement called for?

You don't know much about fascism. or Constitution. Or intimidation. or dissent.

[TreasonousBastard]

98. Take heart wienerdoggie...

some of us actually do get it that two dozen Senators voted for this silly thing knowing how the home crowd feels. Nothing to do with "spinelessness" just how the game is played.

It's all political theater, and the few who take it all that seriously and getting all het up about it don't know enough to help the cause anyway.

They could hurt it though. Gotta watch out for the ignorant rushing into a delicate situation and screwing things up even more.

[rateyes]

8. It's time for a revolution. nt

I'm sick to my stomach.

[sicksicksick_N_tired]

11. Hey, now, c'mon. Don't place much value on that. If anything, encourage Moveon to,...

,...do another impactful ad that pisses the RW off to the point of hysteria.

It's not like a condemnation is a prohibition.

Moveon should come right back and hit the RW even harder.

[spanone]

20. if this were another nation, we would say it puts a chill on democracy

others will think twice

[halobeam]

23. I hear ya, BUT

They ought to do an ad to piss off BOTH SIDES at this point.. apparently, they both deserve MORE truth in a full page ad. Quite frankly, and more importantly, we the people deserve it.

[tridim]

13. So, who gets to spank Eli Parser?

Or does he just get a timeout?

This whole thing is just pathetic. "Fuck it" is right on.

[skiddlybop]

21. What's the list of 25?

I consider it to be the progressive's Schindler's list for the rest of my political giving for the next ten years. I'm not giving a cent to anyone but the 25.

Because they stood up for me.

[Ian David]

16. When do we get to see a roll-call? n/t

[daninthemoon]

36. And the exact language. What exactly did these wimps roll over

on now. Why does every rethug vote pass, and any dem issue get squashed without even a vote? Don't I remember the dems telling us if they just had a majority things would change? Now it's: if we just had a bigger majority? Yet the rethugs do as they please as the minority? What don't I understand about this?

[Ian David]

96. The Majority Party can filibuster too, can't they? n/t

[uppityperson]

129. Here is the text and another fun bit.

To express the sense of the Senate that General David H. Petraeus, Commanding General, Multi-National Force-Iraq, deserves the full support of the Senate and strongly condemn personal attacks on the honor and integrity of General Petraeus and all members of the United States Armed Forces.

And, just for fun, the First Amendment to the Constitution: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

[MisterP]

148. then we'll need the Presidency, then a supermajority, then a Yabloko majority in the Duma

[Vinca]

18. You're bad boys, MoveOn, naughty, naughty boys.

One might say nasty, naughty, bad boys.:rofl:

[HughBeaumont]

25. .

[FloridaJudy]

93. Wicked, bad, naughty, evil MoveOn!

They are a naughty organization, and they must pay the penalty! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtcSYPjJbgg

[Beausoir]

113. ROFL! Priceless.

[valerief]

19. This Congress has absolutely nothing to do with my life except make it worse. nt

[budibudinski]

29. ..yep, about sums it up for me too.

Power to Moveon.org...game on.

[SnoopDog]

22. So, the Senate's sense is that the 1st Amendment no longer applies to all?

We are in trouble folks....

[TwilightGardener]

27. Please--this does nothing to the First Amendment. It's just political symbolism.

[SnoopDog]

40. Right - it is political symbolism that abates the 1st amendment,...

Now many more nails in the coffin are you willing to live with...?

[TwilightGardener]

46. Oh my God, such hyperbole and melodrama. Get a grip. No one but

political junkies are even paying attention to this bullshit, and no one will remember this or hold it up as an important or historic vote.

[me b zola]

62. This vote will be used in the generaql elections

When Move-On does an ad for one of our candidates the publicans will counter the ad with a smear against Move-On--not the issues. Just watch.

[TwilightGardener]

67. Well, maybe MoveOn should be a little more careful next time. Stick

to issues, and not make personal attacks.

[immoderate]

77. Personal attacks are protected.

--IMM

[TwilightGardener]

90. Not saying they're not. Just saying it's not politically wise, which is why

we even had this stupid fucking vote today.

[immoderate]

128. Consider the rarified number that take notice of this...

It's hard to pick who wins and loses.

One scenario: MoveOn gains more donors and support. The senate looks stupid, and people are turned off by the pageantry, and a few more people take notice and voice. The senate takes a step closer to adjust to reality. :)

OK, so that's optimistic.

Somebody should point out that no one challenged the content of the body copy.

--IMM

[me b zola]

85. Perhaps the Senate should have voted

on denouncing the soldiers who used the name 'Betray-Us' long before Move-on did.

And the point that I was making was that this will hurt the Dems, not Move-On. It will, of course, hurt some Dems more then others. Reading the roll call will be very telling.

[TwilightGardener]

91. I wish the Boxer vote had passed. Oh well.

[me b zola]

110. We're not in the same discussion, are we?

[Warren DeMontague]

111. Right. The AM Airwaves are full of right-wingers like Coulter calling for liberals to be beaten with

baseball bats... The GOP called Bill Clinton a "scumbag" on the floor of the House of Representatives.. CNN gives airtime to a guy who has fantasized on-air about killing Michael Moore and other liberals...

And we are shocked- shocked and outraged, dammit!- that moveon engaged in a "personal attack" by making a dumb play on Petraeus's name.

Fucking spare me.

:eyes:

[spanone]

99. i bet it's on the Network News tonight......i'll bet

[Robbien]

47. Political symbolism which says GOPers can do whatever they want

and Dems will help GOPers stick it to their own party and the American people.

Political symbolism which says Democratic Senators would rather play nice with GOPers than play nice with their own party.

Sounds pretty important to me this "just political symbolism" of yours.

[TwilightGardener]

52. I'm speaking in terms of this having any effect on law. Effect on politics--that's arguable.

[spanone]

31. oh no, it still applies to democrats. they refused to diss the max cleland ads or john kerry

[BadgerLaw2010]

119. You're free to say whatever you want. Others are free to find it offensive.

1st Amendment does not require that people like what you say.

[Jed Dilligan]

30. You have the fallout?

Feinstein yea and Boxer nay would be my guess for my state.

[bcoylepa]

33. just once

I want the Dems to turn their backs on stupid tricks like this vote and refuse to take part - just once
call it what it is - a blatant political maneuver and let the people know that we don't have time for this kind of show -there is important work to do

[spanone]

35. don't hold your breath

[orleans]

41. i'm wondering how something like this was even able to come up for a vote

who allowed this?

[StarryNite]

59. Exactly!

People are dying because of the lies of * and his corrupt administration and they waste their time on this?

[Stuckinthebush]

34. Can they condemn FOX news now?

That'd be a hoot if a Dem introduced the condemnation of FOX news resolution.

[L. Coyote]

37. The F word. HUGE HINT for trolls and worms. How to destroy DU overnight.

HUGE HINT for trolls and worms. How to destroy DU overnight.

Just add as many F words as possible to every post.
Google will have us downgraded to zero within the hour!

[spanone]

39. who you callin a troll? when fuck it applies i will use it.

and who cares about google?

[charlie]

53. I care about Google

How does my hair look? Are my shoes alright?

[L. Coyote]

76. No one. Just stating a fact. Obscenity downgrades site rank in search engines.

Most search engine users have absolute zero chance of seeing this page if
they search for this topic, because the default settings screen obscenity.
This is simply a fact those using obscenity on DU should be aware of, that is all.

Say what you wish, but do it knowing what the consequences of your actions are.

[karlrschneider]

I just did a Google search for the exact phrase, this very thread was the first result.

...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=Aok&q=%22yeas+72+nays+25%22&btnG=Search

[spanone]

118. and EVERYONE will type this thread into google? yep, you're right

[orleans]

48. oh please!

[Individualist]

57. BULL SHIT!

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

58. Fuck that stupid shit.

[Annces]

60. are you a control person?

[Beelzebud]

106. Sit down, shut up, or we'll taze you!

[Warren DeMontague]

147. Oh for fuckitty fuck fuck fuck's sake. First off, most of the trolls are prissy republican

church lady types. Their little pointy heads just about 'splode when they're forced to read about gay relationships or evolution or people using birth control and fucking for non-procreative purposes. That's WHY they're republicans, silly! So they can "cleanse" the filth of the pagan wasteland and leave it pure, sexless and chaste, like that weird ending with Don Johnson in "a Boy and his dog".

They recoil from a hearty FUCK like nobody's bizness. You'll get my fuck when you pry it from my cold, dead, er, hand.

Anybody who isn't smart enough to turn off safesearch on google, we don't need 'round here, anyway.

[soothsayer]

38. they're so dumb they have no idea why approval is 11%. They'd leap to 90% if IMPEACHMENT

proceedings were started! jerks.

[Individualist]

43. and so arrogant they think voters will tolerate this shit and still vote for them!

[cascadiance]

51. But fall to 10% support with their corporate sponsors!

THAT is the poll figure that counts with them. We live in a country that is of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations. The people are being asked to step aside now! It's just a matter of time before the voting systems are permanently rigged to prevent any control by us at all.

[mikelgb]

42. why did the bill even make it to the floor?

[spanone]

44. now there's a good question

[in_cog_ni_to]

49. Because asshole Cornyn added it to the approproriations bill...

:grr:

[demobabe]

92. that's a great question. why are they wasting our tax dollars...

...why waste tax dollars to vote on this crap? Why couldn't they just make some statement saying they didn't condone the ad? No need for a vote. What a waste.

[Skip Intro]

45. you're effin kidding me

of all the things that need condemnation - criminal bush regime, wars for profit, dismantling of the Constitution, bush schoozing with freerepublic on the WH lawn, the prtraying of Dems as traitros and terrorist sympathizers - and our representatives decide to condemn MoveOn.


Until now I've been holding back, trying to give the Dems a fair shake, benifit of the doubt, etc, but no more. Where is the list of who voted how?

[mmonk]

50. Too bad democrats were just conned into attacking

an organization that could help them.

[Flabbergasted]

54. This guy must be tickled pink....

[halobeam]

63. Gosh! as if I wasn't sick to my stomach enough?

[Individualist]

73. So are his fellow DLCers

:puke:

[StarryNite]

80. Talk about a troll

:puke:

[rucky]

56. Anyone have a Roll Call? n/t

[MadHound]

61. Yay! The gutless wonders roll over again.

So much for free speech in this country. Sadly, this is but a foreshadowing of other more important bills they'll roll on, like re-upping the funding for the Iraq war.

It will be interesting to see who kowtowed to the 'Pugs on this one.

And Dems wonder why people perceive less and less of a difference between them and the 'Pugs.

[Lydia Leftcoast]

64. MoveOn isn't the issue. The issue is that more than half the Democrats

caved like spineless cowards and voted FOR a stupid bit of Republican hysteria.

They should have countered with a resolution supporting the first amendment.

What a useless bunch of wimps.

[spanone]

68. they did counter with the Boxer amendment

this amendment was to include the attacks on Max Cleland and John Kerry....they voted it down.
\
so this only applies to democratic ideals.

[Lydia Leftcoast]

84. So they can't even stand up for their own people?

Good God, I knew this would happen. I knew this would happen.

I knew that the Dems would take back Congress in 2006--and completely blow the opportunity of a lifetime. Cave here. Cave there. What good are they?

[cascadiance]

69. I wonder if the Dems introduced a bill saying the "nuclear option" on fillibustering was wrong!

Would the Rethugs follow suit with their MO for everything else and fillibuster it?

If they did, it would look pretty stupid. And if they didn't, it would basically label them as hypocrites for what they tried to pull on the Democrats when they were in power! It would be a nice Hobson's choice to expose them for they hypcorites they are!

Perhaps Reid should pull something like that out of his hat!

[Freddie Stubbs]

65. They must have been listening to Elizabeth Edwards

[The Count]

81. How so? What did she say?

[Freddie Stubbs]

88. Here you go:

Elizabeth Edwards criticizes MoveOn.org ad
By TONY LEYS
REGISTER STAFF WRITER


September 14, 2007

MoveOn.org should not have labeled Gen. David Petraeus “General Betray Us” in a controversial newspaper ad, Elizabeth Edwards said in Des Moines Friday.

“Someone who’s spent their life in the military doesn’t deserve ‘General Betray Us,’” said Edwards, wife of Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards.

Elizabeth Edwards spoke in an interview after a Des Moines campaign appearance. She noted that her father was a career naval officer, and she grew up on Navy bases, so she said she respects military service.

MoveOn.org is a liberal, national group that supports many of the stances that John Edwards has taken in his campaign, including criticism of the Iraq war. The group ran a full-page ad in the New York Times this week, taking a shot at Petraeus, who is the top military leader in Iraq. The ad ran on the day the general was to testify to Congress about progress he sees in Iraq. Its headline sparked angry protest from Republicans, who said it smeared an honorable man.

more: http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070914/NEWS/70914014/1001/LIFE

[JVS]

70. I condemn congress for voting on dumb shit like this instead of improving actual policy

Way not to make a difference you bunch of fuckwads!

[gollygee]

72. Where was the condemnation for the Swift Liars?

Stupid stupid people.

[The Count]

78. Cronyn 'splained it: it was just politics, because Kerry wasn't in uniform. See?

:shrug:

[spanone]

83. where was cornyn when bu$h* FIRED his other 'generals'....why didn't he back them?

[Warren DeMontague]

79. How many votes could we get for a condemnation of dumbass wars based on lies?

Probably not 72. :eyes:

[Initech]

86. That would be every war since WWII.

Korea - lies. Bay Of Pigs - lies. Vietnam - lies. Gulf War - lies. Iraq - lies. So yeah, our government wouldn't be so quick to do that.

[Warren DeMontague]

109. I think one could make a rational case for Korea

but I agree on all the rest.

[harun]

132. In the Senate less than 5, maybe 0, in the House you could

probably get quite a bit. Know you would get Kucinich.

[Warren DeMontague]

141. I know it would get my Representative's support, too.

She's another one of the good ones. :thumbsup:

[debbierlus]

87. Excuse me, why was this allowed to even come to the floor????

Given the dem majority, they could have blocked it. WTF????

I am FURIOUS.

The dems are completely neutered. This is disgusting.

[Individualist]

94. Complicity

This is why the DLC is dangerous. For all their claims of supposedly wanting to help Democrats, they employ people like Marshall Wittman who specifically try to undermine the Democratic Party, even if it means he has to publicly defecate out the most rank and easily-debunkable lies. They reguarly give credence to the right wing's agenda and its worst, most unsupportable lies. They are the real force that tries to make sure this country is a one party state and that Democrats never really challenge the Republicans in a serious way.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/why-the-dlc-is-so-dangero_b_13640.html

Without a doubt, the DLC is the most fundamentalist organization within the caucus, the most ideologically rigid, and the most destructive to the progressive cause.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/5/24/1712/23448

[Beelzebud]

104. Because Harry Reid is a wimp, and he capitulates to them every chance he gets.

[moondust]

105. I agree.

It should have been dismissed up front as the totally discriminatory partisan political garbage that it is and nobody's time or resources should have ever been wasted on it.

[JuniperLea]

95. We need to raise hell every time they say shit like...

Hillary-Care... or Hillary-Aid... or any of the hundreds of other snide remarks they make.

This means war.

[loudsue]

100. The DLCers...the republican infilTRAITORS to the Dem party, are

leading the whole party now, and they are funded by their republican masters.

It's all about buying of the legislators. As long as $1.00 buys one vote in this country, we, the people, will never have a say in our government. The corporations that are robbing this country blind have bought up all the votes, own the voting machines, own the politicians, own the media, own the health care, own the military, own the courts.

We need to dump the whole lot of them. It may be too late for 2008, but another few years of this bullshit, and there are going to be riots in the streets.

[Freddie Stubbs]

117. You are right about us DLCers leading the party, but

you are incorrect that we are funded by 'republican masters.'

PS: You can't stop us.

[loudsue]

124. You should be too ashamed to show your face.

"You can't stop us" is right. You're part of the republican party that is owned by the corporations. YOU and your kind are the reason we no longer have a decent country to live in anymore.

DLCers are despicable creatures.

[Freddie Stubbs]

131. I'm proud of DLCers like Bill and Hillary Clinton

http://www.imgred.com/

[loudsue]

139. They are the ones responsible for making this the mess it is.

I know their benefactors in Arkansas, and they are republicans, who donate to the democrats that can be bought off. They didn't call him "slick willie" for nothing.

And now, we're going to get stuck with the rest of the family, because they are so damned cozy with rupert murdock & that gang, that they're getting all the free press in the world.

I'm to the place where I NEVER want to see another clinton or bush in office. Ever. Or lieberman. Or rahm emmanuel. I'm sick of the whole lot of them....sicker of them than they are of me and the rest of the democratic base.

[Individualist]

140. The only thing worse than a neocon is a neocon enabler,

[Gregorian]

102. Congress just trivialized itself.

Shame. A very sad day.

They could reaffirm their condemnation of Darfur. Or perhaps work on who revealed the CIA agent. Or condemn the loss of Habeas Corpus.

[JackRiddler]

135. Really? I thought Freedom Fries already accomplished that. nt

[Gregorian]

136. DAMN YOU! I had all but forgotten.

I mean, really, I forgot that was done in Congress. And please don't remind me who the Senator was. I don't want to remember. He was that whiny little turd.


Oh woe is me. :)

[Beelzebud]

103. We can't change the course in Iraq, but we can condemn MoveOn.org?

Fuck the Democrats.

I'm done.

[spanone]

108. get mad, but don't leave...need you now more than EVER

[ecstatic]

107. they have time to vote on sh!t like this?

:wtf:

Aren't troops still dying?

[Warren DeMontague]

112. Someone should tell them that flags are being burned, titties are showing up on network tv, and kids

are being prevented from saying "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance.

THAT will get their attention. :eyes:

[Beausoir]

115. My thoughts exactly. What a silly group of people up there in D.C.

[nadinbrzezinski]

114. And this is just another exmaple of WHY the dems will loose

all in '08

You watch it, but they are weak kneed, do not know how to fight bunch of cowards

They vote for this crap, meant to CONDEMN freedom of speech... but cannot use procedure to gum up the Cons

Like I don't know, MAKE THEM HOLD A REAL FILIBUSTER, start readying cons... when you stop, its over

[daninthemoon]

125. It's a total win/win for the rethugs every time. Their sick base sees

them "standing up for the military" Everyone else sees the dems as pitifully week and ineffectual. What don't our reps understand about this?

[mudesi]

116. Spineless cowards. (nm)

[mdmc]

120. Thank GOD chIMPREACHMENT is still off the table

so they can do "our" work. :patriot:

[Freddie Stubbs]

121. Considering how the Senate just voted, do you think conviction would pass?

:shrug:

[ToeBot]

122. Here's a link to the vote:

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00344

[BelgianMadCow]

123. LINK : Some were looking for the roll call, here it is

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00344

from the LBN thread.

excerpt :
Alphabetical by Senator Name
Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Alexander (R-TN), Yea
Allard (R-CO), Yea
Barrasso (R-WY), Yea
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Not Voting
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Brown (D-OH), Nay
Brownback (R-KS), Yea
Bunning (R-KY), Yea
Burr (R-NC), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Not Voting
Cardin (D-MD), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Casey (D-PA), Yea
Chambliss (R-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Nay
Coburn (R-OK), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Coleman (R-MN), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Corker (R-TN), Yea
Cornyn (R-TX), Yea
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Crapo (R-ID), Yea
DeMint (R-SC), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Dole (R-NC), Yea
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Durbin (D-IL), Nay
Ensign (R-NV), Yea
Enzi (R-WY), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Graham (R-SC), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Hagel (R-NE), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Isakson (R-GA), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Nay
Kerry (D-MA), Nay
Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Lieberman (ID-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Martinez (R-FL), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McCaskill (D-MO), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Obama (D-IL), Not Voting
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Reed (D-RI), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Salazar (D-CO), Yea
Sanders (I-VT), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
Sessions (R-AL), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Smith (R-OR), Yea
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Sununu (R-NH), Yea
Tester (D-MT), Yea
Thune (R-SD), Yea
Vitter (R-LA), Yea
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Webb (D-VA), Yea
Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Nay

[spanone]

130. Link for the Boxer ammendment.

this was a vote to also condemn the SWIFTBOATERS AGAINST KERRY AND THE MAX CLELAND ADS

Alphabetical by Senator Name
Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Alexander (R-TN), Nay
Allard (R-CO), Not Voting
Barrasso (R-WY), Nay
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Nay
Biden (D-DE), Not Voting
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Yea
Brown (D-OH), Yea
Brownback (R-KS), Nay
Bunning (R-KY), Nay
Burr (R-NC), Nay
Byrd (D-WV), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Not Voting
Cardin (D-MD), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Casey (D-PA), Yea
Chambliss (R-GA), Nay
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Coburn (R-OK), Nay
Cochran (R-MS), Nay
Coleman (R-MN), Nay
Collins (R-ME), Nay
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Corker (R-TN), Nay
Cornyn (R-TX), Nay
Craig (R-ID), Nay
Crapo (R-ID), Nay
DeMint (R-SC), Nay
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dole (R-NC), Nay
Domenici (R-NM), Nay
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Durbin (D-IL), Yea
Ensign (R-NV), Nay
Enzi (R-WY), Nay
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Graham (R-SC), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Nay
Gregg (R-NH), Nay
Hagel (R-NE), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Nay
Hutchison (R-TX), Nay
Inhofe (R-OK), Nay
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Isakson (R-GA), Nay
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), Nay
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (ID-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Nay
Lugar (R-IN), Nay
Martinez (R-FL), Nay
McCain (R-AZ), Nay
McCaskill (D-MO), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Nay
Menendez (D-NJ), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Nay
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Obama (D-IL), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Reed (D-RI), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Roberts (R-KS), Nay
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Salazar (D-CO), Yea
Sanders (I-VT), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Nay
Smith (R-OR), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Nay
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Sununu (R-NH), Nay
Tester (D-MT), Yea
Thune (R-SD), Nay
Vitter (R-LA), Nay
Voinovich (R-OH), Nay
Warner (R-VA), Nay
Webb (D-VA), Yea
Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Yea

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00343

[Cha]

145. Yeah, mccain's a real asshole.

fucking traitor to the military. And what's with feingold and any Dem who voted nay?

It's like it's okay to condemn the truth from activists but to condemn lies from freepers..well, this senate will just let it stand..ASSHOLES

[NoPasaran]

126. Gee, no one would guess from this that 25 Dems voted AGAINST

And no one here has any vitriol to spare for the repub assclowns who all voted YES.

[BelgianMadCow]

127. True - Clinton voted no, Obama did not vote at all

[RiverStone]

138. I'm not a Hillary supporter, but BIG kudos to her

For voting NO on this Constitution trampling bs.

Good job Hillary --- keep doing stuff like this, I may even start to like you.

[spanone]

133. i think that vitiol is a given imho

[JackRiddler]

137. Yay! Half the Democrats voted against the latest fascist insanity!

[Rockholm]

134. SWIFT BOAT

Where were the asswipes when Kerry was being attacked by the Swift Boat traitors? Enough. Enough.

[ElsewheresDaughter]

143. spineless bastards...how come no one ever condemned the swift boaters?!?

we are screwed

[Blue_Tires]

144. the strange part is

i couldn't imagine something like this passing even when the senate was still in GOP control...