Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton to Offer Health Care Plan (Ugh!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:13 AM
Original message
Clinton to Offer Health Care Plan (Ugh!)
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 03:15 AM by SoCalDem
Clinton to Offer Health Care Plan
The Associated Press - 3 hours ago
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j3s8p4osFk88PUwaGyOU5ZldeXFw
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) -

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton is unveiling a sweeping health care reform proposal Monday that would require every American to carry health insurance and offer federal subsidies to help reduce the cost ...

With a price tag of about $110 billion per year, Clinton's "American Health Choices Plan" represents her first major effort to achieve universal health coverage since 1994, when the plan she authored during her husband's first term collapsed. The former first lady says she has learned from that experience, which almost derailed Bill Clinton's presidency and helped put Republicans in control of Congress for years to come. Aides say she has jettisoned the complexity and uncertainty of the last effort in favor of a plan that stresses simplicity, cost control and consumer choice.

The centerpiece of Clinton's plan is the so-called "individual mandate," requiring everyone to have health insurance — just as most states require drivers to purchase auto insurance. Rival John Edwards has also offered a plan that includes an individual mandate, while the proposal outlined by Barack Obama does not. "It puts the consumer in the driver's seat by offering more choices and lowering costs," Neera Tanden, Clinton's top policy adviser, told The Associated Press. "If you like the plan you have, you keep it. If you're one of tens of millions of Americans without coverage or don't like the coverage you have, you will have a choice of plans to pick from and you'll get tax credits to help pay for it."

Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner, has already laid out proposals to improve health care quality and reduce costs. She was to release her universal health care plan in Iowa, the first voting state.

snip...

.............................................

:grr: Don't these people GET it? Slapping another mandate..a bill.. onto already cash-strapped people is NOT the solution to health care issues..

Insurance is the PROBLEM...not the solution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is everything wrong
This is really stunning. Putting aside the profit and insurance issue, it is still every single thing people object to.

Tax credits never help working people and working people know it.
There's also mandates on business, which is going to get the business people voting against this right off the bat. Then there's the extra costs to business, which is the opposite of what small business needs to compete globally.
And while everybody will need to be mandated into something, eventually, this is not really a good platform to try to win the White House on.

It's like she took the worst of everything proposed for the last 4 years.

Democrats will never get elected with this. I'm actually really surprised at how bad this really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. And what's to prevent bosses from saying to workers
"Look..we pay $xxx.00 on your behalf for insurance, so starting on mm/dd/yy, we're gonna give this amount to you in the form of a bonus (taxable, no doubt), and you're on your own"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. I just wrote her office. It's a terrible plan. Just awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. You're so right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Don't like the sound of this one at all
I will wait until later to read it over, but why can't we have Medicare for all? It's not a perfect system, but seems to work for our Senior. Isn't that DK's proposal?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Yes, Kucinich supports Medicare for all.
AKA Single Payer Universal Healthcare. It's the only way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. The government fears this because
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 07:32 AM by SoCalDem
It automatically "earmarks" a significant amount of money that they like to play with..for starting wars, handing out to their pals, and using for bribes to stay elected..

Until we have a first things first approach to our tax money's use, we will never get what we deserve:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. What a nightmare. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ooooohhhhhh...Tax credits...Wow
And for the poor who don't pay taxes -- they get what???
The shaft???!!!

I liked her as a candidate last spring, although Edwards has been my candidate since 2004. But,as time goes on...I like her less-and-less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. with EITC you still get a refund
this might work the same way. Good question to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. EITC is once a year, when one files? no?
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 04:57 AM by SoCalDem
yet insurance premiums are monthly-quarterly ..no?

How are poor people going to swing that one? and what if when the EITC "reimbursement" comes through just as the car one needs to get back and forth to work, breaks down? How many people will "gamble" and fix the car?

This whole thing reeks.. What do people who get laid off do? Where DOES this "extra money" come from..to keep the payments made for insurance?

For poor people or marginally employed people, insurance is a "luxury" that many cannot really afford, even if there might be a reimbursement coming at a future date..

Car insurance is mandatory here in CA, but millions of people drive uninsured because they just do NOT have the money.. they take on some cheapo bullshit insurance when it's time to renew their registration, and then they drop it until the next time around.

they gamble that they will not have an accident...just as people will gamble that they will not get sick..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. maybe the plan answers those questions
I don't think people know enough about the plan to evaluate it so definitively.

But those are all good questions about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. How will she get insurance companies to cut the costs of their premiums?
What good is choice if they are financially excluded from most health care plans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. People will just have to cut down on their consumption of bon bons
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 04:48 AM by SoCalDem
mocha-chino half-caff frou-frou lattes and croissants :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. How about when the insurance companies throw them overboard because they get 'too' sick?
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 06:59 PM by rpannier
I want that addressed as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Oh but of course!
Let's put millions of tax dollars into the pockets of people yearning to buy another yacht.

See...if you have a job then you get to pay (through the nose) and if you don't have insurance but you have the money, then you MUST give the fat cats their due. Of course the last part is really clever: if you don't have insurance and you don't have the money, then we'll give all the big money donors tax dollars.

Will anyone actually be covered if they get sick?

Well the congress will but I'm not counting on much for the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. Individual Mandate: Hillarycare 1994 redux
Didn't she learn one single thing from her 1994 failure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Oh, she learned something, all right...
..."Don't mess with Big Insurance."

This is nothing more than a "plan" to maximize insurance company profits, while adding another pseudo-tax (and a damn heavy one at that) on the average American.

No wonder HRC is one of the biggest recipients of insurance company contributions.

And this is the best the Democratic frontrunner can do?

Sorry to recycle a Republican slogan from back then, but "There's got to be a better way!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's the Mitt Romney-fication of health care.
Give the illusion of "universal health care" when it's the opposite in reality.

This is sad. Too many pols are beholden to Big Pharma and Big Insurance. I'm beginning to wonder if this country will EVER see true single payer health care. Or will be be the only industrial country not to have any such program 50 years from now? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I live in big pharmaville.
I know exactly how much they control. You should have seen the panic and the non-stop private helicopters day in and day out right after the elections last year. There were throngs of thousand dollar suits closed up in boardrooms. They made their move immediately and apparently it's paying off for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Wouldn't it be interesting if it were Romney vs. Clinton in 2008
and the Massachusetts boondoggle (which is a lot like Hillary 2.0) starts caving in- which it surely will, given time.

And unfortunately no- the only way ordinary Americans will ever see any semblance of universal care that doesn't leave them bankrupt is to move to Canada or abroad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. But insurance companies
are OUR problem, not HERS. She got her paycheck.

We have two parties that represent 4% of the people and apparently 100% of the insurance industry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. i'm a consumer -- not a citizen.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Rankles a bit don't it?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
20. I totally agree SoCal
This is BULLSHIT!

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
23. After all the time it too for her to put this out
this was the best she could come up with? So much for her political savvy ... well, unless she's looking to make points with insurance companies.. nah.. not Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
24. Edwards: You can't sit down to dinner with the drug companies, they'll eat all the food.
Horrible, horrible plan, Senator Clinton. HORRID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
25. Which is why I'm voting Kucinich. He has put forth the only viable option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. he's being too sensible..
It's too bad that dennis doesn't look like Romney.. he'd BE the candidate :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Which saddens me greatly that so many people who rail against the M$M and it's love of...
"pretty" celebs fall right into lockstep in backing the "pretty" candidates instead of focusing on the ideals of the platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. It's a sad fact.. people who look "different" just get excluded
in all walks of life. unless they are super clever or invent something amazing, they usually spend their lives on the periphery, and we never get the benefit of their brilliance..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC