Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats cite progress on Webb amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 12:28 PM
Original message
Democrats cite progress on Webb amendment
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/democrats-cite-progress-on-webb-amendment-2007-09-16.html

Democrats cite progress on Webb amendment
By Klaus Marre
September 16, 2007

Democrats on Sunday indicated that they are in the process of building support for language that would give troops longer rest periods, and Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) said he hopes enough votes can be found to override a presidential veto.

The measure, championed by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), would require troops to get as much downtime at home as they spent in Iraq. A consequence of the legislation, Democrats hope, will be that the current troop levels in Iraq cannot be sustained.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Sunday that he would recommend that President Bush veto any such language, meaning it would take 67 votes in the Senate to pass it over the White House objections. The last time it was up for a vote, the measure failed to get the 60 votes necessary to overcome a GOP filibuster.

But Democrats believe that support is building.

“Right now, Senator Webb’s amendment, I would guess, has at least 57 votes, on a bipartisan basis,” said Reed on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos. “We want to move and move forward, pick up the votes. This process is sometimes too slow, but it’s a process that I think is going in the right direction. We’re picking up support. And I think on this issue, we can pick up sufficient votes -- 60, I hope 67.”

Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) acknowledged that the Democrats do not have enough votes to override a veto but said this should not prevent them from fighting to pass the legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC