Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top story on Fox this morning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:05 AM
Original message
Top story on Fox this morning
Is it Obabma's announcement? NO

Is it the Libby trial and whether Cheney will testify? NO

Is it the WH cooking intell in the lead up to invading Iraq? NO

Iran is sending weapons to Iraq.



Be afraid, be very afraid!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Plan is moving forward nicely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. To whom in Iraq are they alleged to be sending weapons?
Somebody please tell me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well the I.S.G. report said 80% of the attacks on our troops ...
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 10:29 AM by Botany
.... were from Sunnis so Iran is sending weapons to their blood enemies?


Also a must read.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/09/AR2007020901917.html?nav=rss_opinions

2) We must continue the war to prevent Iran's influence from growing in Iraq. This is another absurd notion.
One of the president's initial war aims, the creation of a democracy in Iraq, ensured increased Iranian influence,
both in Iraq and the region. Electoral democracy, predictably, would put Shiite groups in power -- groups
supported by Iran since Saddam Hussein repressed them in 1991.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. But Al Qaeda started the Sunni/Shiite division & Al Qaeda is linked to Iran like it was to Iraq and
ugh.



BTW, that WaPo link is truncated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Link fixed



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. No, thank *you*!
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 10:33 AM by Roland99
1) We must continue the war to prevent the terrible aftermath that will occur if our forces are withdrawn soon. Reflect on the double-think of this formulation. We are now fighting to prevent what our invasion made inevitable! Undoubtedly we will leave a mess -- the mess we created, which has become worse each year we have remained. Lawmakers gravely proclaim their opposition to the war, but in the next breath express fear that quitting it will leave a blood bath, a civil war, a terrorist haven, a "failed state," or some other horror. But this "aftermath" is already upon us; a prolonged U.S. occupation cannot prevent what already exists.

2) We must continue the war to prevent Iran's influence from growing in Iraq. This is another absurd notion. One of the president's initial war aims, the creation of a democracy in Iraq, ensured increased Iranian influence, both in Iraq and the region. Electoral democracy, predictably, would put Shiite groups in power -- groups supported by Iran since Saddam Hussein repressed them in 1991. Why are so many members of Congress swallowing the claim that prolonging the war is now supposed to prevent precisely what starting the war inexorably and predictably caused? Fear that Congress will confront this contradiction helps explain the administration and neocon drumbeat we now hear for expanding the war to Iran.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Odom what a liberal
William E. Odom, a retired Army lieutenant general, was
head of Army intelligence and director of the National
Security Agency under Ronald Reagan. He served on the
National Security Council staff under Jimmy Carter. A West
Point graduate with a PhD from Columbia, Odom teaches at Yale
and is a fellow of the Hudson Institute.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/16/Major_General_William_Odom,_official_military_photo,_1983.JPEG/180px-Major_General_William_Odom,_official_military_photo,_1983.JPEG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Terrorist sympathizer.
:P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Exactly.
Now here's the follow-up: where are the Sunni insurgents getting their money and logistical support?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-12-08-saudis-sunnis_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. let me guess our buddies the Saudis?
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 10:38 AM by Botany


pg. 29

From your link .... I now know about ZAQAT ..... :puke:

Two high-ranking Iraqi officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the issue's
sensitivity, told the AP most of the Saudi money comes from private donations, called zaqat,
collected for Islamic causes and charities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. We could end all the BS with a simple impeachment inquiry
into any number of impeachable offenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Amen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh geez. Sonofamitch McConnell is up next. I cringe every time I see/hear him.
Damn, wtf is wrong with my state?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Juan Cole: Blame these US deaths on Iran . . . a black psy-ops operation
Informed Comment
Sunday, February 11, 2007
http://www.juancole.com

It is far more likely that corrupt arms merchants are selling and smuggling these things than that there is direct government- to- militia transfer. It is possible that small Badr Corps stockpiles were shared or sold. That wouldn't have been Iran's fault.

Some large proportion of US troops being killed in Iraq are being killed with bullets and weapons supplied by Washington to the Iraqi army, which are then sold by desperate or greedy Iraqi soldiers on the black market. This problem of US/Iraqi government arms getting into the hands of the Sunni Arab guerrillas is far more significant and pressing than whatever arms smugglers bring in from Iran.

. . .


The attempt to blame these US deaths on Iran is in my view a black psy-ops operation. The claim is framed as though this was a matter of direct Iranian government transfer to the deadliest guerrillas. In fact, the most fractious Shiites are the ones who hate Iran the most. If 25 percent of US troops are being killed and wounded by explosively formed projectiles, then someone should look into who is giving those EFPs to Sunni Arab guerrillas. It isn't Iran.

Finally, it is obvious that if Iran did not exist, US troops would still be being blown up in large numbers. Sunni guerrillas in al-Anbar and West Baghdad are responsible for most of the deaths. The Bush administration's talent for blaming everyone but itself for its own screw-ups is on clear display here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Are they saying WE are the only ones who can send weapons
to Iraq. Do they show Bush stamping his feet saying "this is MY war and you're not invited".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yes, we are officially in the pimp phase of the run-up to the Iran Attack
I was about to start a thread on this, but apparently I'm not the only one who noticed. This A.M., in the snooze mode, I heard (C-SPAN? Book TV?) featuring something about Iran destroying Israel. I switched to (CNN?) and a breathless reporter was saying those bombs were manufactured blah blah.

This must been the SECOND stage of pimping because it has been going on on Faux and others for months before this. But it looked like the hype for Jurassic Park this A.M.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. Jesus H - if giving weapons to a country is grounds for war, we need to go to war with ourselves.
Fuck this bullshit.

It's only when the so-called "bad guys" do it that we take action. When our guys are over there getting shot with guns we sold/gave to terrorists, we don't give a shit. When Iran does it, they better watch the fuck out, right?

Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC