Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Bizarre Break With Tradition, Washington Post Practices a Little Journalism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:25 AM
Original message
In Bizarre Break With Tradition, Washington Post Practices a Little Journalism
:D Love the title!

In Bizarre Break With Tradition, Washington Post Practices a Little Journalism
Submitted by davidswanson on Fri, 2007-09-14 13:47. Media

The President Asserted Progress on Security and Political Issues. Recent Reports Weren't Often So Upbeat.
By Glenn Kessler, Washington Post


In his speech last night, President Bush made a case for progress in Iraq by citing facts and statistics that at times contradicted recent government reports or his own words.

For instance, Bush asserted that "Iraq's national leaders are getting some things done," such as "sharing oil revenues with the provinces" and allowing "former Baathists to rejoin Iraq's military or receive government pensions."

Yet his statement ignored the fact that U.S. officials have been frustrated that none of those actions have been enshrined into law - and that reports from Baghdad this week indicated that a potential deal on sharing oil revenue is collapsing.

In a radio address to the nation less than a month ago, the president himself complained that the Iraqi government was failing to address these issues. "Unfortunately, political progress at the national level has not matched the pace of progress at the local level," Bush said on Aug. 18. "The Iraqi government in Baghdad has many important measures left to address, such as reforming the de-Baathification laws, organizing provincial elections and passing a law to formalize the sharing of oil revenues."

Bush also asserted that Baqubah, the capital of Diyala province, was once an al-Qaeda stronghold but that "today, Baqubah is cleared." But in a meeting with reporters on Aug. 27, the head of the State Department team in Diyala said the security situation was not stable, hampering access to food and energy, though he acknowledged that commerce was returning to Baqubah.

more...

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/26745
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good article ...
... GREAT title!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, the WPs writers were dilgent on the hazards of starting this war, etc...
Rajiv Chandrashakaran, Robin Wright and Thomas Ricks did excellent reporting about the hazards of initiating this war. And don't forget Dana 's series exposing Walter Reed.

The editorial page of the WP is close to hopeless, but they had a lot of good reporting on the war, it's just on page 17.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. True, I subscribe to the WP - it's local - and "the reporting pages" are IMO, good journalism.
But damn those kool-aid drinkers within the lion's share of the content of WP's Editorial Pages. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I got so ticked I cancelled my subscription. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Is Robert Woodward part of the editorial board?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, I believe that 'ho is. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC