Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers blasts DoJ for ’selectively’ providing U.S. attorney docs.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 05:23 PM
Original message
Conyers blasts DoJ for ’selectively’ providing U.S. attorney docs.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/10/conyers-wants-answers-from-doj-on-political-prosecutions/

Conyers blasts DoJ for ’selectively’ providing U.S. attorney docs.

In July, Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) and other members of the House Judiciary Committee wrote to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales requesting documents from U.S. Attorney’s offices that participated in prosecutions with political overtones. The Department has refused to turn over most of the documents. Now, Conyers and his colleagues want Gonzales to explain why DoJ is withholding the documents:

Since our original letter, even more evidence has come to light showing an aggressive effort run by White House political operatives to use the machinery of government for partisan advantage and establishing that top members of your staff attended political briefings led by Karl Rove. (…)

The few materials that the Department has provided are clearly insufficient. You have offered approximately 350 pages of public pleadings, but even this production has been limited to pleadings that represent the Government’s position in those matters.

We understand that the Committee may obtain publicly filed documents from the courts without the Department’s assistance, but we question the value of the Department selectively providing those few pleadings supporting its arguments but not providing any responsive pleadings or court decisions that present contrary arguments and facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Par for the course with these shameless criminals. recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope Chairman Conyers got a little rest over the break because we need him to
Edited on Mon Sep-10-07 05:29 PM by mod mom
get into high gear and kick some butt with these criminals. Resignations are not good enough-we need real justice to show these thugs that crime doesn't pay like it used to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He's hinted that (the 'i' word) isn't totally out of the question now. I too
hope he's rested and raring to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. he 'blasts' them. is that like arresting? or indicting? anything like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. :Uh oh. Conyers is mad again...
Edited on Mon Sep-10-07 07:15 PM by rateyes
he'll get over it.

He always does.

Tired of talk, Mr. Conyers. When are you going to hold Rove and Miers in contempt? When is there going to be some bite behind the bark?

Like I said, he'll get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC