Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DNC: White House Blatantly Edits GAO Report on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:48 PM
Original message
DNC: White House Blatantly Edits GAO Report on Iraq
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 03:52 PM by bigtree

September 4, 2007 at 03:30 PM
Email this Print this Blog this Digg this


Last week, a leaked report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) revealed that Iraq has failed to meet 15 of 18 benchmarks for political and military progress. (http://www.democrats.org/a/2007/08/draft_of_report.php)

The report was leaked by an official who feared the White House would water down its grim assessment of the situation in Iraq. Now, it appears that the official was right.


From the Associated Press: (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070904/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq)

Baghdad has not met 11 of its 18 political and security goals, according to a new independent report on Iraq that challenges President Bush's assessment on the war.

The study, conducted by the Government Accountability Office, was slightly more upbeat than initially planned. After receiving substantial resistance from the White House, the GAO determined that four benchmarks--instead of two--had been partially met.



Let's do the math. According to the original report, the Iraqi government met only 3 of 15 benchmarks. After the White House intervened, the Iraqi government was given "partial credit" for 4 more benchmarks.

A headline about the original report would have read: "Iraq hasn't met 15 of 18 benchmarks." Now the Associated Press headline reads: "Iraq hasn't met 11 of 18 benchmarks." A significant--and blatant--difference.


http://www.democrats.org/a/2007/09/white_house_bla.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe they are ...
grading it on a curve.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. you can be Katie Lipstick Couric will put a smiley face on this report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. criminals
worthless fucking criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. umm. at the hearing on cspan3 just now Walker said they got new information
from the time draft was written. july 31.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is more the AP, as usual, put a more positive spin on the report
than any major change. The report states:

3 benchmarks met
4 benchmarks partially met
11 benchmarks not met



Report found at talkingpointsmemo:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/gao-report/?resultpage=2&
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Im glad someone else noticed that!
It started that they had only met 3 and then the next day I believe it was 5 and today I saw it was up to 11? I thought the same thing, what the hell is going on here? Do people in America really not pay any attention to whats going on around them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. unfortunately, people in america do not pay attention to what is going on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. And soon to be reported by FOX News ........
From this lie ....... "Iraq hasn't met 11 of 18 benchmarks." to this lie.......

IRAQ HAS MET 7 BENCHMARKS !!!! THE SURGE IS WORKING !!!! hip hip hooray !!!!! , wait for it, it's coming .... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. I heard NPR mention the 11-18 number today without saying anything about the leak
even though they mentioned the leak last week. Blink your eyes and history changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. they repeat the lie over and over
and it becomes shorthand for the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Past administrations and Congresses
maintained the independence of the GAO. Bush respects nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. Our government routinely lies to us.....fuckers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC