|
Edited on Sat Sep-01-07 03:14 PM by jpgray
Whatever Craig is (gay, bisexual, curious), I've seen a lot of posts on DU arguing that the admittedly repressive and discriminatory attitudes towards gays in this country excuse his behavior. They see him as a closeted case engaging in a tried and true method of anonymous sexual solicitation, motivated by the even -more- extreme culture of hate and fear directed towards gays during much of his past.
There are several problems with this, but the main one is that his circumstances neither force or excuse his hypocritical behavior. First of all, not all closet cases who lead double lives due to our repressive society actively advocate to debase the rights of GLBT folks. Secondly, many who lacked even a barest fraction of Craig's power and privilege faced the exact same terrible persecution, yet they handled it with grace, honesty, dignity and bravery. So much for Craig being at the mercy of circumstances--his -own- choices in the end decided his behavior. However much those choices were influenced by his environment, others lacking his resources faced the same challenges and surmounted them without resorting to rank hypocrisy and bigotry.
We can both lament the circumstances that must have influenced his behavior -and- condemn him as an individual for making the ugly, dishonest choice to actively debase the rights of other homosexual/bisexual folks. We don't have to choose one or the other.
As for the public restroom solicitation angle, public sex should be illegal (though people of all orientations do it), but public solicitation I don't think should carry a sentence. Whether peering in a stall for two minutes qualifies as harassment is something I'm not qualified to answer (I'd say yes), but all these questions miss the point. The uncovered behavior he was arrested for isn't very wrong or evil, the extreme hypocrisy he has -chosen- to engage in -is-.
|