Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Probably done before but real simple belief poll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 04:38 PM
Original message
Poll question: Probably done before but real simple belief poll
I'm interested in how many DUers are believers and of what type. Obviously there are more nonbelievers here than in the general population but it would be nice to see where the ratio is.

I am keeping the poll options very vague and non-judgmental. It is not my intent to start attacking any group at all - just looking for numbers. I'm not a moderator nor do I want to play one but I for one would be perfectly happy with no text responses and just poll numbers. There are plenty of threads on which to argue about religion - my goal here is just to see where the breakdown is.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know that there is no way to ensure that this poll will be an accurate representation?
Any poll like this - that involves self-selection of those polled - is highly unlikely to represent the actual beliefs of DUers with any accuracy. All these polls are just for fun. You'll get a sampling of those folks who happened to feel like responding to your poll at the time you posted it. That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Oh of course
I'm just looking for a vague indication. The more responses the closer that's likely to be of course, but no I realize this will not be a valid sample to make any deductive conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, I don't REALLY consider the programmer of this simulation "God"
He or she is just a very talented game designer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFriendlyAnarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I go to a catholic school and no one knows what deist is. . .
I've given up on explaining it and just saying that I'm not sure. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am studying Buddhism but I don't call it a faith or belief system.
The Buddha was a human. There is no god to believe in. It is basically a way of living your life and a way of treating all living things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yep understood
Just put it in there since I know a few people on here are Buddhists. I would probably say what you are describing is a belief system however, just not one that involves a deity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Why I say it is not a belief system is because there are no matters of faith
that you need to believe in to be a Buddhist. There is no creed like in Catholicism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Oh I agree there.
More using it in the sense of something which guides thoughts and actions. Belief and faith are subtly different concepts, and creed is definitely a distinct concept from either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-23-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I have a few belief systems and meta-belief systems, none of them invovle a specific diety
I subscribe to various aspects of Buddhism, Taoism, etc. I get why you included Buddhism as a separate choice, but it is important to point out that "non-theistic belief" and Buddhism are not mutually exclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Delete
Edited on Wed Aug-22-07 05:11 PM by DemGa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MatrixEscape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. My thanks to the OP for using the word "nontheistic"!
It is really appreciated that you chose your terminology studiously. There are subtle distinctions and your alacrity is beneficial to clear understanding and discussion about such matters.

There is a point where, once one has uprooted and discarded the weeds of belief and faith that a new flavor of tolerance emerges. For, in that sense, one sees abstract thought and symbolic representation as largely a belief system to varying degrees, be it in the personal, political, philosophical, religious, or scientific sense.

At that point, one is struck with, at the very least, a belief in the existence of the mind. One observes that existence and mind and whatever transcendental concepts one holds to be true are merely mental objects as thought. Those mental objects never are what they convey, nor are they even direct links to a potential actuality in a subjective sense.

So, the persisting belief in mind is left due to habit and training. There is evidence to suggest it exists, but it is often of the same type, (though more complex and convoluted) as the kind used by those subsets and factions of mind that we call religious and spiritual.

The stark and obvious problem is that evidence is not proof. Finding the mind itself is an issue akin to finding concretely , in a direct and knowable way, the object of any subjective modality, be it a deity or a transcendental plane.

I could add that what we experience as existence and life could very well just be a pattern, (as complex and rich and diverse as those we see in nature's structures) and what we call mind is merely a reflection of that pattern that allows for an ephemeral, but observable knot that we call self or I. One simply finds one's self in layers of self-representation and relationship that imply, synergistically, something real and tangible out of cultural necessity alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC