Bench Conference, by Andrew Cohen
The Charade of Presidential Public Speeches
I don't really need another reason justifying why television networks should no longer automatically cover live public appearances by the current or any other president. But if you do, read Peter Baker's startling piece in today's Washington Post, a chronicle of the manipulative and insulting extent to which the Bush administration has gone to ensure that presidential appearances are like campaign commercials.
(NOTE: Link to the article referenced by Cohen, "White House Manual Details How to Deal With Protesters":
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/21/AR2007082101662.html?hpid=topnews)
Thanks to a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of two protesters who were arrested in West Virginia in 2004 for failing to cover their "anti-Bush" t-shirts during a presidential rally, we now have proof that the White House choreographs these events as closely as if they were a scene from the movie "Reds." Free speech rights are nullified. Free expression is thwarted. The spirit of the First Amendment, if not its letter, is completely ignored -- all in the name of pretending to a television audience that the president is beloved and, quite literally, beyond criticism....
***
Roaming "rally squads"! In America. In 2007. Can you imagine?
What can you do about it? Probably not much. What can television executives do about it? Plenty. They can refuse any longer to offer a live, free national platform to this or any other White House's staged event. They can tell administration officials that until those folks respect the First Amendment rights of protesters, they will not broadcast their events.
Would doing so ignore their newsgathering responsibilities or functions? Absolutely not. Reporters still should cover such events, and producers still should tape them. But they should be evaluated for broadcast the same way that political speeches are.
If the White House is going to treat dissent with such premeditated disrespect, then the White House deserves to be precluded from continuing to use the media to manipulate its message. All the king's horses and all the king's men can't hide the president's overwhelmingly unpopularity -- and the media shouldn't either.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/benchconference/2007/08/the_charade_of_presidential_pu.html#more