Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'There's been so much death - and now this' 9/11 kin see familiar mistakes in skyscraper blaze

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 11:59 AM
Original message
'There's been so much death - and now this' 9/11 kin see familiar mistakes in skyscraper blaze
Edited on Mon Aug-20-07 12:01 PM by RamboLiberal
Source: NY Daily News

For those who lost loved ones at Ground Zero six years ago, Saturday's deadly fire showed that the lessons of 9/11 still haven't been learned.

"There's been so much death on that site, and now all of a sudden this happens," said Diane Horning, whose 26-year-old son, Matthew, died in the World Trade Center. "I am devastated at their loss. But on top of that, I am angry."

Horning and others said the deaths of two firefighters - who were trapped gasping for air in a doomed building - seem to echo the 9/11 tragedy because of bad decisions, poor communications and inadequate equipment.

Community members near the 130 Liberty St. site of the former Deutsche Bank building had long complained about unsafe demolition practices and the toxic materials in the building, only to face official indifference, she said.



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/08/20/2007-08-20_theres_been_so_much_death__and_now_this-2.html



Blame contractors for hazards, lack of water, FDNY source

Shoddy work by contractors at the toxic former Deutsche Bank tower contributed to nightmarish conditions that trapped and killed two firefighters, FDNY sources told the Daily News.

General contractor Bovis Lend Lease's construction plan called for the 41-story skyscraper to have a working water source throughout the demolition.

"They were responsible for having water in that building and for keeping it free of combustible materials," a fire source said. "Clearly, that did not happen."

FDNY officials and building owner Lower Manhattan Development Corp. declined to comment on the work while the investigation continues.

But sources said the building was filled with flammable materials and debris, which helped spread the blaze.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/08/20/2007-08-20_blame_contractors_for_hazards_lack_of_wa-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wonder who picked the contractors? This from the 2nd article
Officials with the John Galt Corp., the Bovis' subcontractor charged with asbestos abatement, could not be reached.

Galt has no previous experience tearing down contaminated skyscrapers - but The News reported last year that Galt execs previously ran a demolition company with reputed mob links that was responsible for the spectacular 2005 collapse of an upper West Side supermarket during demolition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who is John Galt? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That would be funny
if this were not so tragic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. That makes his name memorable, and I remembered this:
...The News reported last year that Galt execs previously ran a demolition company with reputed mob links that was responsible for the spectacular 2005 collapse of an upper West Side supermarket during demolition.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. ANOTHER DOG THAT DIDN'T BARK..This building was under a huge blaze..but it did not collapse!!
yep the building was being stripped..of everything..no windows all replaced with ply wood..and yet it had a huge fire..and ..oh my ..it didn't collapse!!

but the three buildings right next to it 6 + years ago collapsed...because of fire??????????

yep another dog that did n't bark!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Mhmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Monday night 9PM est. History channel is running a show about the WTC

Examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the World Trade Center was brought down by a controlled demolition; that a missile, not a commercial airliner, hit the Pentagon; and that members of the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks in hopes of creating a war in the Middle East. Each conspiracy argument is countered by a variety of experts in the fields of engineering, intelligence and the military.




The program also delves into the anatomy of such conspiracies and how they grow on the Internet.



http://www.history.com/shows.do?action=detail&episodeId=240087

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC