Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sports Fan's Responses To Athelete Domestic Abuse vs Athelete Dog Abuse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 05:11 PM
Original message
Sports Fan's Responses To Athelete Domestic Abuse vs Athelete Dog Abuse
Wife abuse vs. dog abuse

Salon - Broadsheet
By Tracy Clark-Flory
August 17, 2007

Radar's editors are in the mood for controversy, it seems. They've created an http://radaronline.com/features/2007/08/michael_vick_dog_fighting_kobe_bryant_01.php">online quiz (titled "Bitch Slap") aimed at comparing public comments about sport superstars accused of rape or domestic abuse with the spleen spewed at Michael Vick over allegations that he killed and tortured dogs. The quiz asks you to guess which comments, from teammates, coaches and fans, were made about accused rapists or wife batterers and which were directed at the Atlanta Falcons quarterback.

Jen Stein writes, "Vick's critics have been so unforgiving that a reporter in Pittsburgh went so far as to say that the player would have been 'better off raping a woman.' The reporter later apologized for his remarks but, based on people's vitriolic reactions, he may not have been so far off the mark... It seems that Americans will tolerate certain things from their athletes -- a sexual assault charge, stalking, the occasional domestic dispute -- but they draw the line when it comes to their pooches."

The quotes included in the quiz generally support the author's upfront thesis: The comments directed at Vick are reproachful and full of disgust; the comments about accused domestic abusers or rapists are much more forgiving and make pleas for judgment to be reserved for the courtroom. For instance, the following quote comes from Denise Kaigler, spokeswoman for Reebok (which banned Vick's jersey at its retail stores): "The number of e-mails and statements we're getting from consumers was pretty telling about how disturbing people find these allegations to be."

On the flip side, here's a quote from Tampa Bay Devil Rays manager Joe Maddon after learning that outfielder Elijah Dukes' wife had filed for a restraining order against him after he allegedly "left a death threat on her voice mail and sent a photo of a handgun to her cell phone": "In visiting with him, I can see he's pretty much upset. I anticipated that, so I thought the wise thing to do would be to not start him tonight and more than likely play him tomorrow."

Read more: http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/08/17/vick/print.html?blog=/mwt/broadsheet/2007/08/17/vick/index.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can not believe those who need to balance one
against the other....

Physical abuse and violence towards a human or animal is just unacceptable and in this case absolutely evil. To do so against a defenseless child or animal IS the ultimate in cruelty, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree with your points....
...completely. Children and animals usually have no choice.

And yet is an interesting observation and maybe symptomatic of where we are in our society, that we generally don't hear the same level of hue and crying over domestic abuse by athletes of their spouses, when compared to the recent case involving animals.

I'm not trying minimize or excuse anyone's behavior, whatever it may have been. I suppose I just wish that as a people, we were just as indignant and un-accepting when it comes to the abuse and murder human beings....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Lots (maybe most) DUers believe that animals are as morally valuable as people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC