Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McClatchy: Commerce, Treasury funds helped boost GOP campaigns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:37 PM
Original message
McClatchy: Commerce, Treasury funds helped boost GOP campaigns
Edited on Fri Aug-17-07 04:45 PM by babylonsister
Our tax dollars at work?

Commerce, Treasury funds helped boost GOP campaigns
By Marisa Taylor and Kevin G. Hall | McClatchy Newspapers

* Posted on Fri, August 17, 2007



Millions in federal money went to battleground congressional states and districts. | View larger image

WASHINGTON — Top Commerce and Treasury Departments officials appeared with Republican candidates and doled out millions in federal money in battleground congressional districts and states after receiving White House political briefings detailing GOP election strategy.

Political appointees in the Treasury Department received at least 10 political briefings from July 2001 to August 2006, officials familiar with the meetings said. Their counterparts at the Commerce Department received at least four briefings — all in the election years of 2002, 2004 and 2006.

The House Oversight Committee is investigating whether the White House's political briefings to at least 15 agencies, including to the Justice Department, the General Services Administration and the State Department, violated a ban on the use of government resources for campaign activities.

Under the Hatch Act, Cabinet members are permitted to attend political briefings and appear with members of Congress. But Cabinet members and other political appointees aren't permitted to spend taxpayer money with the aim of benefiting candidates.

During the briefings at Treasury and Commerce, then-Bush administration political director Ken Mehlman and other White House aides detailed competitive congressional districts, battleground election states and key media markets and outlined GOP strategy for getting out the vote.

Commerce and Treasury political appointees later made numerous public appearances and grant announcements that often correlated with GOP interests, according to a review of the events by McClatchy Newspapers. The pattern raises the possibility that the events were arranged with the White House's political guidance in mind.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/19034.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Under what law did they THINK they could do this? Did they make
up another of their special rules? Any opinions coming from the DOJ would have been under Ashcroft as well as Gonzales.

WHY DON"T WE JUST ASK THEM FOR THE COMPLETE LIST OF NEW RULES THEY OPERATE UNDER INSTEAD OF THE DRIBBLES THAT WE GET? WHILE WE'RE AT IT - LET'S FIND OUT THE NAME OF THEIR NEW CONSTITUION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Simply maddening, isn't it. Is this even legal? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hell no it's not legal! It's the same type of thing Duke Cunningham is in jail for!
They're screwing the taxpayers BLIND!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It doesn't matter whether it's legal -- they can count on pardons, can't they? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. That was during the time when Tom Delay WAS the government...
so it was all legal.

(Do I really have to put the sarcasm smilie thingie here? Is anyone too dense to get it otherwise? Well, if you are, go suck Bush's thumb in the picture here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1608928#1608996
)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. The GAO used to check into how departments spend their money, a basic
accounting function. I also though that there was an office like Inspector General to look after this. The bastard Rove has taken over everything, now they are writing checks to the republicans. Even government civil service employees have been converted. The whole system has broken down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Now we know why Rove left and the RNC claims Executive Privilege
to say nothing of getting to the root of Jenna's wedding announcement!

Shit and fan.... CONTACT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. Can we impeach yet?
Thanks for the heads-up, Babylonsister. Great work, McClatchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Outraged K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. ...and this will continue into the 2008 election....where's Karl?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Helping his former intern merry into BFEE and create massive diversion?
Keep this thing kicked. It is MAJOR and, sadly, will be lost in the jenna mania even here at DU.
:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. Explains the GOP sock puppets on TV grumbling about Hatch Act and Vote Vets guys
One more case of 'try to confuse, diffuse coming chatter about a major GOP scandal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. kick for the afternoon shift
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-18-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
17.  A third-rate burglary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC