Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anger at customs agency in LAX snafu

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 11:00 AM
Original message
Anger at customs agency in LAX snafu
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-me-airport14aug14,1,1666322.story?coll=la-headlines-nation
From the Los Angeles Times
Anger at customs agency in LAX snafu
Aviation officials criticize the agency for its weak response to a computer glitch that left 17,000 stranded.
By Ted Rohrlich and Tami Abdollah
Los Angeles Times Staff Writers

August 14, 2007

Aviation officials criticized U.S. Customs on Monday for being unprepared and taking too long to fix the weekend computer failure at LAX that left more than 17,000 international passengers stranded for hours in airplanes. Accustomed to frequent, short-lived outages, customs officials said they mistakenly believed their computers would be up and running within an hour Saturday.

Then they made another mistake, aviation officials said. They misdiagnosed the problem, deciding it involved high-speed communications lines that link to the national law enforcement databases used to assess possible security threats posed by arriving passengers. They called in the service provider, Sprint Nextel Corp. But a technician did not arrive for four hours, aviation officials said, and took three hours to determine that the transmission lines were not the problem.

(snip)

As planes began to stack up on the tarmac Saturday afternoon and into the evening, airline and airport officials pressed customs to relax its inspection standards and process passengers based on information the passengers themselves provided. But customs officials declined. "We can't risk our security for even one traveler," Fleming said. "What if one was a terrorist?" Meanwhile, Los Angeles International Airport officials discussed defying the federal government and storming aircraft to rescue passengers if frustration led to violence aboard the idling jets... They settled instead for providing food, drink and enough fuel to keep air-conditioning systems running, with customs' blessing.

(snip)

By then, Haney said, airport officials had asked the Federal Aviation Administration to divert some incoming flights, but only two were diverted. "I guess at the end of the day there's pilot discretion," Haney said. Despite the glitches, most pilots wanted to land at LAX.

(snip)

The computer system was up and running again at 11:45 p.m. (The system went down at 2:00 pm). The passenger backlog was cleared hours later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. They need to outsource
the technical people to India. That way it can take longer. Let's get with the program people! The Bush Administration is here to destroy the Government. He can't do it without your help!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is a result of offshoring and corporations trying to save $$$
When I was working, our mission critical vendors were on site 7/24. Sounds like these people (Airlines) have contracted with the vendor for the standard four hour response window to save a couple of bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC