Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYTimes: Notes Detail Visit to Ashcroft’s Hospital Room

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 02:46 PM
Original message
NYTimes: Notes Detail Visit to Ashcroft’s Hospital Room
Edited on Thu Aug-16-07 02:48 PM by understandinglife
Notes Detail Visit to Ashcroft’s Hospital Room
By DAVID JOHNSTON and SCOTT SHANE


WASHINGTON, Aug. 16 — John Ashcroft was “barely articulate,” “feeble” and “clearly stressed” as he sat in a hospital room chair in March 2004 when top White House aides unsuccessfully tried to persuade him, as the Attorney General, to sign an extension for warrantless domestic eavesdropping on Americans, according to notes made by Robert S. Mueller III, the director of the F.B.I.

Mr. Mueller’s notes of his visit to Mr. Ashcroft’s hospital room provide another eyewitness account of the dramatic confrontation over the secret surveillance program. They confirm an account of the encounter given by James B. Comey, the former deputy attorney general, who testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about it in May.

Mr. Mueller’s typed notes, which are undated, also reveal a series of meetings earlier and later that month between the F.B.I. director and other administration officials, including Mr. Comey, Alberto R. Gonzales, then White House Counsel and General Michael V. Hayden, then the director of the National Security Agency, which conducted the electronic monitoring program.

<clip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/16/washington/16cnd-inquiries.html?hp=&pagewanted=print



IT IS TRIBUNAL TIME IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. What are you waiting for?????
Impeach, Indicte, Imprison........and send the war criminals to the hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. No shit. WTF MORE do they need????
Honest to Pete - WHAT MORE do they need???

I swear, it boggles the mind. It just does. The footdragging and reluctance and hesitation, the absolute SPINELESSNESS - it all drives me frickin' NUTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Conyers: "Unfortunately, this heavily redacted document raises far more questions than it answers.
We intend to fully investigate this incident and the underlying subject matter that evoked such widespread distress within the Department and the FBI. We will be seeking an unredacted copy of Director Mueller’s notes covering meetings before and after the hospital visit and expect to receive information from several of the individuals mentioned in the document."

<clip>

More of Conyers statement and some excellent comments at: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/8/16/154345/268



Awaiting inherent contempt ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Link to the .pdf file
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. "That compartmentalization is the key to their whole conspiracy operation. It must be used to ...
... create plausible deniability so only those who "need to know" about their crimes in order to execute them are allowed to know. It explains how "no one knows" how the various US Attorneys got onto their firing list. It explains how come they're all so smug when they tell Congress and the press "I don't know". Because they are kept from knowing, because no one can know too much.

It's a fiendishly clever scheme to stay stupid. Who cares if those compartments prevent them from keeping the country running. It is keeping them in power, and safer from impeachment and prosecution.

Congress must demand to know how the compartmentalization works. And how it doesn't work. How it works against accountability and organizational competence.

And then IMPEACH THESE GODDAMN CRIMINAL CONSPIRATORS already.

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2007/8/16/154345/268/75#c75


Interesting perspective.

I prefer inherent contempt ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. so the MSM picks this up...good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Democats have a crisis on their hands.
I hope they rise to the occasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Conyers and Waxman have all they need ... it's "inherent contempt" time ...
... and it doesn't stop with Gonzo ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They certainly do have enough to proceed. But/ and
they seem to be on a short leash against 2008.

And that's just flat out wrong, imho.

Can you see the Republics sitting on such a situation instead of exploiting it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. "Can you see the Republics sitting on such a situation instead of exploiting it?" Simply, NO.
One can well imagine what Jon Stewart and Keith Olbermann will do with the story ... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. they're on vacation..
Edited on Thu Aug-16-07 05:50 PM by frylock
and that's all need you to know about what the dems have in mind for this so-called constitutional crises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ossaeane Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Where's my popcorn
This oughta get interesting now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Just finished reading it through Muckraker:
Edited on Thu Aug-16-07 03:53 PM by mod mom
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003940.php

although I believe they are mistaken calling the Program RSM, which probably stands for Robert Swann Mueller.

of interest:

"But Mueller reveals something intriguing. According to the FBI director, Ashcroft tells Card and Gonzales that "he was barred from obtaining the advice he needed on the program" -- again, note program, singular -- "by the strict compartmentalization rules of the " Now that's cronyism! For the first time, there's the suggestion that even John Ashcroft -- the attorney general of the United States and by all accounts a loyal Bushie -- didn't know all there was to know about the warrantless surveillance efforts. Apparently, Ashcroft wasn't considered trustworthy enough to be kept in the loop on the most legally controversial program of them all -- though his counterpart at the White House, and eventual successor, clearly was."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. "Apparently, Ashcroft wasn't considered trustworthy enough to be kept in the loop ..."
The essence of just how corrupt and paranoid the Bush gang is ... Bush, Rove, Gonzo, Condi, Bolton, Card, Cheney, Libby ... i.e., anyone with a shred of ethics or respect for the law would automatically be kept out of the loop ...


Awaiting inherent contempt ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Even if it takes the Sergeant of Arms to enforce it! Absolutely inherent contempt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. folks @ TPM are reading this to possibly mean that he Ashcroft was placed in a position
similar to Sen Rockefeller in that he was informed BUT not allowed to speak of it or confer with others regarding it's legality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. ''Tribunal Time in the United States of America''
The phrase has a special ring to it, the sound we've all been waiting for.

KR5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. "General Michael V. Hayden, then the director
of the National Security Agency" participated in Illegal Spying but instead of being indicted he was rewarded with the job of Head of the CIA. Thank you Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. WaPo coverage
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/16/AR2007081601358.html?hpid=topnews

Just how long before Ashcroft and his wife are brought before Conyers committee, willingly or otherwise, and asked the direct questions including "Did Bush call? What did he ask you to do?" ...


IT IS TRIBUNAL TIME IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -- AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM IS INHERENT CONTEMPT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Ashcroft already testified in a private meeting.
He confirmed what Comey testified to in Congress. What was actually said was not reported because it was a secret meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I should have been clearer ...
The type of hearing I'm urging is public, open, and either Ashcroft and his wife answer the direct questions like - Did Bush call you, Mrs Ashcroft, on the night of .... ? What did he tell you to do?

No more secret Q&As ... these people work for us and they should answer questions so we can all hear exactly what they have to say.

As someone wisely posted in a "sticky" -- "Secrecy is the Freedom Tyrants Dream of"

Thank you for noting Ashcroft's secret session and that he confirmed Comey's testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. Google News ... just enter "Mueller notes released"
The list of news sites reporting is growing ... and include "A D.C. Scene Flips to Black" http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/16/a-dc-scene-flips-to-black/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. K&R

Thanks, UL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
24. morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Thank you!
:hi:

Awaiting inherent contempt charges on Bu$h and his neoconster minions ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-17-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. Here's an afternoon kick.
Edited on Fri Aug-17-07 03:34 PM by 8_year_nightmare
Okay, the portion of Mueller's notes that described his meeting with Bush is heavily redacted, but the length of that portion of notes is very telling, isn't it?

When are they going to be put out of business?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC