they recently "infused" $38B of liquidity into "the system"?
Even I'm not cynical enough to believe that they're giving money away, but I guess they must have bought up some of those shaky "assets" built upon the subprime house of cards. Which banks or "investment firms" were the recipients of that largesse? What would have been wrong with just letting the shit run its course while weeding out those firms who engage in speculative assets? Also, how is that not welfare for the rich?
thinking of it as a "bailout" isn't really the way to go.
The fact is that billions in actual money evaporated and there were lots of people and businesses out there who were not part of the schemes and scams who could have gone under without the extra liquidity pumped in.
This is exactly why central banks exist-- to ward off the really bad problems that come with liquidity crunches. One of the eternal analyses of the Depression was that they mistakenly tightened money just at the time it was disappearing naturally. They learned that lesson.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.