|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:50 PM Original message |
RNC Seeking Shelter Of Executive Privilege-Will NOT Abide By Subpoena |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's President of the USA not the fucking RNC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. They want the Roberts Court to decide this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. If even the Roberts court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Bush vs Gore is still stuck in my throat.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-15-07 05:35 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I am still looking for a statement O'Connor made on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-15-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. That is hard core. That would be proof of a crime. I do remember her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-15-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
30. The hell with that - it's time to break out INHERENT CONTEMPT; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. umm.. so Bush considers the RNC advisory for this case? HUH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
4. How in the hell can Executive Privilege extend to a political organization? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. How did it extend to the Tillman case? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Roberts Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. This Will Be Interesting And Bring Tortured Legal Arguments To New Levels Of Idiocy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
6. Executive privilege for political parties? What will they think of next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. This is just getting unbelievable. Can *I* stop cooperating with law enforcment.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-15-07 05:42 AM Response to Reply #7 |
26. No, you may not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
8. UN-FUCKING-BELIEVABLE! JAIL THESE BASTARDS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. The United States is not a monarchy and the President is not a king. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
12. A preemptive f*ck you to anyone who whips out the lame "business days" line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMillie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
14. I don't think there's any precedent for their position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
15. Ah, the BRILLIANCE of the Democrats' "Don't rock the boat" strategy for '08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. Is there another source for this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
18. Fucking Absurd....Exec Privelege for a POLITICAL PARTY??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
19. I don't get what everyone is so upset about. Bush is the Dictator, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
20. I wonder how the propaganda spinners will justify this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. it will be a trip watching. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. More comment on this at duplicate thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-14-07 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. IMPEACH, CHARGE, and IMPRISON these criminals. (nm) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-15-07 06:09 AM Response to Original message |
27. the bigger question - should bush throw the cloak of executive priviledge over the RNC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-15-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Maybe he could just throw executive privilege over all corporations and everyone worth > $1 mill. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC