Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Letter to * from Senator Clinton: she wants draft remarks clarified:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:28 PM
Original message
Letter to * from Senator Clinton: she wants draft remarks clarified:
http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/aug/13/hillary_demands_bush_clarify_position_on_military_draft



August 13, 2007

The Honorable George W. Bush
The White House
Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President:

I write with great concern over recent comments by the Deputy National Security Adviser, Lieutenant General Douglas Lute, which suggest that a military draft “has always been an option on the table.” Since raising the prospect of a draft contradicts the previously stated policy of your Administration, I ask that you clarify your current policy regarding the possibility of re-instituting a military draft.

Our volunteer military is the best in the world and has been performing heroically under difficult circumstances in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. As you proclaimed in 2003 on the 30th anniversary of the all-volunteer force, “For the last 30 years, we have been fortunate to have a military composed entirely of volunteers… Since that time, our volunteer Armed Forces personnel have upheld the finest traditions of our military and our country.” A year later, Department of Defense spokesman Lawrence T. Di Rita, said, "It is the policy of this administration to oppose a military draft for any purpose whatsoever. A return to the draft is unthinkable. There will be no draft."

While our forces, in particular the Army and Marine Corps, are under strain, re-establishing a draft is not the answer.

The seeds of many of the problems that continue to plague our mission in Iraq were planted in the failure to adequately plan for the conflict and properly equip our men and women in uniform. Whether the problem has been inadequate body armor on the ground in Iraq or inadequate treatment for injured soldiers at Walter Reed, there has been a deeply disturbing trend: a failure to serve the men and women who signed up to serve our nation. Rather than raising the specter of a draft, the administration has a duty to focus on providing our current service members with the equipment and benefits they need and deserve.

In previous years, when asked about a draft, your Administration has stated that it is the Administration’s policy to oppose a military draft and support the all-volunteer force. Given Lieutenant General Lute’s comments last week, I ask that you clarify whether there has been a change in your Administration’s opposition to reinstituting a draft.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely yours,

Hillary Rodham Clinton

CC: The Honorable Stephen Hadley, National Security Adviser
The Honorable Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. i imagine hadley & bu$h* will wipe themselves with said letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dear Hillary,

Trust us, we know what we're doing

George


Dear George,

OK

Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. ...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. perfect
this needs to be repeated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. ah, that's DU for ya
damned is she does, damned if she doesn't

new sig line: DU -- the Home of Selective Outrage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't understand your comment; I don't think anyone has yet
disparaged her on this thread for writing the letter.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. check out #2
"Trust us, we know what we're doing

George


Dear George,

OK

Hillary"

and this is flattering to Hillary how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I just took it as something the
dim one might have thought after he got the letter, providing he even does and/or reads it. IOW, I took it as a putdown of Clinton by *, not a putdown of Clinton.
OK, carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. and you could be right
that's what's interesting about language and perception. A simple exchange can be seen many different ways. No harm done.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. No, it is also--and primarily--a put-down of Hilalry. It presents a scenario that
embodies the criticism of Dems that they talk tough and then immediately back down when Bush says "Trust me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Yes, I know- it's horrible how people have different opinions.
Hillary's a DLC hack. I judge her by her voting record, not by the silly, toothless political statements she makes during a primary season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. BREAKING: Army says questioning the Commander in Chief supports our enemies
"How dare Clinton question our dear leader during this time of crisis. She is giving aid and comfort to Al Qaeda."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you, Hillary. This mother appreciates your letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. How do you "adequately plan for the conflict"
when the realistic assesment is: quagmire?

This is just the 'Democrats can manage the war better than Republicans' bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. "re-establishing a draft is not the answer"
Actually, re-establishing a draft could be an answer. It would immediately mobilize Americans against the war and we would be out of Iraq in a heartbeat.

A draft won't ever happen. But, politically, just the idea of a draft would benefit the anti-war movement and any Democratic presidential candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. Now Hillary is upset about "the table"...
So the draft is on "the table".

Well, just a short while ago, Hillary made the point that, of all things, nuclear weapons should still be on "the table". Telling our enemies what we would or would not do is bad, Bad, BAD! Even though Hillary said the same thing a year ago. Well, you know how women change their minds? Or does candidate Clinton simply flip-flop?

Isn't it ironic that the administration has not said it wanted a draft, it hedged its intention with the same hedge Hillary used? Now they can say it is just an option, it is just on the table, and it would be weak, etc to not at least have the draft "on the table"....

So what a thing to watch! Hillary and the Bush administration and the table!!!

This table is getting a workout with all this bs about the draft and nukes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC