Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there a layman's description of the just passed FISA expansion ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:16 AM
Original message
Is there a layman's description of the just passed FISA expansion ?
I would like to understand this better so I can talk about it intelligently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. OK here's a rundown, anyone correct me if I'm wrong...
Before the bill, FBI or whatever can wiretap anyone involved with foreign communications, that they think will gather information on possible, violent, operations in the United States. After 48 hours, they have to go to a judge to get a warrant for the wiretap, to continue the wiretap and make it admissible in court. This law does away with the second part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I listened to some of the debate and there was a lot of talk about modernization...
... they kept saying how the FISA law is from the 70's and does not work as well in the age of email and cell phones. Did this legislation address that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. As far as I'm aware of, not really...
As far as the law is concerned, wiretapping laws, including FISA before this law was put in place, applied to any electronic communication. Whether it was phones(cell or not), e-mail, BBS boards(from the 1980s), or Internet chats, I don't think there was a difference. The whole point of FISA was to intercept time sensitive information before it comes to fruitation, like a ticking bomb scenario. FISA courts were put in place so that there would be SOME oversight over the wiretaps, this was partially in response to the COINTELPRO program of the FBI and domestic abuses by the CIA back in the 1950s and 1960s.

The fact of the matter is that the law, as written in the 1970s, was just fine, Bush just wanted the judicial oversight gone, mostly because its an obstacle to illegitimate wiretaps, on political opponents, for instance. The fact that so many Dems went along with this, in addition to trying to justify it as needed for national security, is an insult, to be frank about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. here is a very simple summary:
The legislation that passed would allow for the intelligence agencies to intercept – without a court order – the calls and emails of Americans who are communicating with people abroad, and puts authority for doing so in the hands of the attorney general. No protections exist for Americans whose calls or emails are vacuumed up, leaving it to the executive branch to collect, sort, and use this information as it sees fit.
from the ACLU.
There is a post from yesterday by tahitinut with more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hmm.
So did the democrats make some sort of deal and vote for it knowing full well it's ridiculously unconstitutional and would be stricken by the courts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I have NO idea why they did it. I can't come up with a good reason, or any reason
for that matter. I'm furious. I'm going to start calling senators' offices to ask why, but I have to calm down first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Doubtful
since the courts are rigged. The Democrats simply made a political decision that this would make them look tough of terror and get them home sooner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. How bout this?
"Now they're allowed to tap your phone, read your mail, track your web browsing and go through your sock drawer for no reason at all."

How's that?

Or this:

"Warrants? We don't need no stinkin' warrants!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Plain and Simple it means "Fuck you,, we'll do what we want"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:23 AM
Original message
Here's what I've got...hope this helps...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks, that looks like good info n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. n/t
Edited on Mon Aug-06-07 11:23 AM by cynatnite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Remember "Freedom of Speech?"
It was a quaint idea that the Project for A New American Century didn't like all that much.

Now, if the words Allah, Jihad and qaida appear in the same phone call or email, your ass will never see the light of day, again.

Please tell my daughter I love her, and I didn't run away and join the circus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Are there any DUers from other countries, besides Canada???
If so, then we'll ALL be under suspicion at some point in time.

Go ahead and let them look at my emails. They'll know for sure, JUST HOW MUCH I HATE THIS ADMINISTRATION.

Gonna arrest me for that??? Huh, Huh???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. I'm from Brasil, and I call and email there a lot, and I am very upset.
Glad you feel defiant, wish I could. I'm sick to my stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. A description from CBS from cynatnite's post
This was referenced in the post by cynatnite. It seems like a good rundown

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/05/politics/animal/main3135604.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC