Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush officials quietly use case of 3 missing U.S. soldiers to argue for new spy powers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 08:24 AM
Original message
Bush officials quietly use case of 3 missing U.S. soldiers to argue for new spy powers
Bush officials quietly use case of 3 missing U.S. soldiers to argue for new spy powers
The Associated Press
Published: August 3, 2007


WASHINGTON: When three soldiers were abducted in Iraq in mid-May, U.S. government lawyers began drafting emergency warrants to try to monitor communications that could lead to the suspected captors.

The Bush administration and its allies, The Associated Press has learned, have argued that the legal work ate up precious hours because of an odd twist to a U.S. surveillance law. One of the soldiers was later found dead in the Euphrates River, and an al-Qaida offshoot has said the others are dead as well.

Normally, warrants would not be needed to eavesdrop on foreigners in Iraq or elsewhere. However, since a secret federal court ruling was issued earlier this year, the Bush administration believes the government must obtain legal approval to listen in on foreign suspects when their conversations cross into the extensive U.S. communications network.

The administration wants to amend the law to allow such monitoring without delay. Many Democrats agree that adjustments are needed, but skeptics say the soldiers' story is being misused.

The political debate about the highly classified surveillance hinges on crucial civil liberties questions: Who should be able to approve this eavesdropping — the attorney general or a federal judge appointed to a secretive court? And at what point are approvals needed?

more...

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/03/america/NA-GEN-US-Intelligence-Powers.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Give him more extrajudicial power, or you're not supporting our troops
Same old crap that worked every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, right.
Whoever grabbed the troops in Iraq was going to talk it over with their cohorts in a secret cell here in the US.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC