Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Roll Call: Terror Surveillance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:54 PM
Original message
House Roll Call: Terror Surveillance
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 11:23 PM by cal04
The 218-207 roll call by which the House rejected a bill giving President Bush expanded authority to eavesdrop on suspected foreign terrorists. On this vote, a two-thirds majority was required for passage under a rule limiting debate.

A ''yes'' vote is a vote to reject the bill.

Voting ''yes'' were 215 Democrats and 3 Republicans.

Voting ''no'' were 14 Democrats and 193 Republicans.

''X'' denotes those not voting.



Democrats —
Welch, N.
Woolsey, N.
Michaud, N.
Holt, N;
Blumenauer, N;
Inslee, N;
Filner, N;
Stark, N
Capuano, N;
Olver, N
McGovern, N;
McDermott, N
Kucinich, N;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070804/ap_on_re_us/house_rollcall_terrorism_surveillance_4
missing one dem I can't seem to find
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Inslee? Mr Impeachment?
What the hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. A lot of those Dems
are some of the most progressive Dems in Congress. There must be some other issue at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleVet Donating Member (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jim McDermott???? That right there tells me that there has *got* to be
a lot more to the story than what has gotten out so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Quite right.
McDermott, Inslee, and Kucinich are definitely not voting to grant more fascist power to the Cabal. My guess is that they wanted to keep holding the pro-totalitarian Cons up to the spotlight, rather than just dumping the the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldgrowth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. What's up with Blumenauer??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe they want to keep the debate going.
There are some progressive Dems here that must have some problems with the compromise. I'm only speculating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bush 100: Dems 3
Pig-headed authoritarians can push our little runt Dems around like 45 pound weaklings. What a joke Bush Villains keep sucking power up and Dems can only squeal at higher, fainter levels in our defense. These are the people that we elected to fight for us!? A sorry bunch of wieners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Progressive Democrats voted No because they were against amending FISA, and probably
against FISA in the first place. Jonathan Turley said on Countdown last night that FISA is actually unconstitutional in the first place.

Remember, Dennis Kucinich voted No for the emergency funding of the Iraq war? Same reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. So, does this actually kill the Senate vote last night?
Interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. YOU GOT IT EXACTLY BACKWARDS...
A "yes" vote was a vote in favor of the bill.

The bill was the limited version of the FISA expansion and why THIS bill was introduced requiring a 2/3 vote is still a mystery.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC