Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Bill: Women need men's permission to have abortions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:48 PM
Original message
Ohio Bill: Women need men's permission to have abortions
Oh this is rich. A group of legislators in Ohio are pushing a bill that would give men a say in whether or not a woman can have an abortion.

"This is important because there are always two parents and fathers should have a say in the birth or the destruction of that child," said Adams, a Republican from Sidney. "I didn't bring it up to draw attention to myself or to be controversial. In most cases, when a child is born the father has financial responsibility for that child, so he should have a say."

As written, the bill would ban women from seeking an abortion without written consent from the father of the fetus. In cases where the identity of the father is unknown, women would be required to submit a list of possible fathers. The physician would be forced to conduct a paternity test from the provided list and then seek paternal permission to abort.

Written notes? Submitting a list of potential fathers? Sometimes I think that anti-choice folks forget that women are, you know, adults.

But seriously here's the best part of the bill:

Claiming to not know the father's identity is not a viable excuse, according to the proposed legislation. Simply put: no father means no abortion.

...

But wait, it gets even better. Women would be required to present a police report if they want to "prove" that the pregnancy was a result of rape of incest. Because women can't be trusted, obviously.

...

http://feministing.com/archives/007480.html

Via C&L
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, pro-prostitution legislation.
Why don't those hypocritical, flabby-assed, middle-aged white men just admit that the only way they can get a woman is to pay for it, and laws like this keep the supply of young and desperate girls ever-flowing.

After, none of these girls are still virgins...what are their choices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. If his wife wants him to
will he get a castration? I highly recommend it in this case.

:grr: Why don't these freaks join the taliban.

This is absolute BULLSHIT. They are obsessed with women's uteruses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think they're terrified of uteruses n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Yes, and therefore obsessed with controlling them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. No adult should be required to get anyone's permission to do anything with their own body.
Regardless of the genders involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Touche
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Disgusting
Well, time for more dangerous, back-alley abortions XP :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. I was not aware that so many men wanted to raise & pay for babies.
In all the cases I know of, that involved an abortion, the GUY was the one really pushing for it :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. That fucker is from the next town north of here!
I have 6 brother and sister in-laws who live in his district. Unfortunately, most of them would probably support this tripe (yes, even the spouses).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fuck patriarchy.
I think I already responded somewhere else about this particular embarrassment, so nothing further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Longhorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Does the bill require a woman to have an abortion against the her will
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 06:02 PM by Longhorn
if that's what the father wants? This bill doesn't give the father "a" say; it gives him "the" say and the woman NO say! Considering it is her body, her decision should trump anyone else's, period!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh, Jesus.
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 06:09 PM by porphyrian
I guess I haven't argued enough in the last couple of days.

First, I think this is a stupid law.

Second, I believe the decision about what happens with someone's body is their own, and this includes abortion.

Third, I believe that, in a committed relationship or marriage, the man should have some input in the creation or abortion of a family beyond ejaculation. I'm not saying the man should be able to force the woman to abort or keep a baby, only that it should be grounds for divorce to leave him out of the decision.

OK, bring it.

Edit: omitted words
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. well, just maybe we need to educate men and women...
...to respect each other's sexuality. I think that's what you're saying. Ideally, the decision should be mutual between each individual man and woman.

I for one won't flame you. Unless the pregnancy occurred because of rape, most women are gonna include their men in a decision of this magnitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Thank you, and yes, that's basically what I'm saying.
However, the last time I brought it up, I got mobbed. And it's still early...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. We could have a group of volunteer fathers
for the pregnant females to use on the consent forms. It could happen; the same 10-12 males appear to "get around town" and score each night. O8) Works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. So long as they don't require a paternity test to prove
that a guy claiming to be the father really is, that's a great idea. But if they somehow manage to get a law like this passed, don't expect that loophole to stay open for long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Governor Strickland will veto
any and all such nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. It is an outright invasion
of privacy for all the parties involved. In Ohio don't unzip unless you're willing to sign?
What about forged documents? Yeah. One more bureaucracy to deal with paternities and signature analysis. It is such a challenge to tolerate these barbarians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Most of all, they can not nor would they ever
be capable of enforcing such a law....Who's the watch dog? See how effective immigration laws are being enforce......See, it's all campaign pandering for their base. They, Ohio repugs, they could care less if one has an abortion. It's the appearance that matters only to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. This in one reason why
we have such a quagmire in our nation. They are literally dickin around instead of addressing real issues. Taxpayers are financing them while they beat their heads against narrow issues like this. It is absolutely irresponsible and frankly a theft of taxpayer funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scorpiogirl Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. The next, most logical conclusion:
What happens when the woman doesn't want the baby and the father does? Does she then have to go through with the pregnancy? How many suicides will that result in? So as a result, will women be forced to carry and give birth by someone who doesn't even care if they want to have the baby?. How about an abusive, controlling husband? What if she can't prove he's abusive? They just take his word over hers? It must be so because women can't make their own important decisions. :eyes:
What, do husband's own their wives now, too. This is beyond vile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Not just husbands. This law would mean that boyfriends own
women. The guy you have a one-night stand with owns you. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scorpiogirl Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. What a nightmare it all is!
I can imagine many terrible scenarios resulting from this stupid law if enacted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Feminism is the Radical Notion That Women are Human
Imagine that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. "women would be required to submit a list of possible fathers".
soooo does this mean the rapist will show up and give HER permission?!? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. And how would she prove that she was raped
to the satisfaction of the judge to get approval for an abortion without the rapist's consent? That would be a total legal nightmare. Police already refuse to investigate, and DAs refuse to prosecute. Women are already told that there is no case. So now she'd be stuck carrying a rapist's baby to term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. What if the woman doesn't want an abortion, but the man wants her to have one?
Does he get the deciding vote in that decision, too? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. This Bill sounds like the intent is for the putative father to be able to trump
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 06:39 PM by WinkyDink
the woman's decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Exactly ... and that's insulting, degrading and just plain wrong!
:grr:

Note to all politicians, government officials, clergyman and other misogynistic jackasses: Women have BRAINS and they are PERFECTLY CAPABLE of deciding what is best for them, their lives and their bodies! No one - and I mean NO ONE - has the right to control another human being's body!

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Let's pretend this nonsense becomes law. I assume a death certificate
of the "father" will satisfy the legal requirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Oh, Hee, That's Brilliant
Just keep an eye on the newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. Fuck them, fuck this and fuck that bill!!


My head is exploding!







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'd like to see a man try to stop me from having an abortion. Just try it.
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 07:04 PM by in_cog_ni_to
:grr:

It's none of their fucking business what I do with MY body!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
28. Call Bluebear, Ohio ladies. I will sign whatever I need to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. Are they seriously considering this????
or is this one or two freakoids in Ohio government grandstanding for the jesus freaks that have no hope in hell of getting this passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. More....
...

The proposal came less than two weeks after Rep. Tom Brinkman proposed legislation that would ban all abortions in Ohio. Brinkman, a Republican from Cincinnati, was one of eight representatives to co-sponsor Adams' bill.

With the recent liberal swing in Ohio state government, neither bill is likely to come to fruition. However, Adams' less extreme proposal has an outside chance of becoming law - a law that would have a major impact in Portage County and surrounding areas.

...

Precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court indicates that, even if Adams' bill passed, it would likely be ruled unconstitutional by the courts.

...

http://www.recordpub.com/news/article/2327981
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. These counties
have a considerable higher abortion rate than the rest of the state (from the article).

The proposal came less than two weeks after Rep. Tom Brinkman proposed legislation that would ban all abortions in Ohio. Brinkman, a Republican from Cincinnati, was one of eight representatives to co-sponsor Adams' bill.

With the recent liberal swing in Ohio state government, neither bill is likely to come to fruition. However, Adams' less extreme proposal has an outside chance of becoming law - a law that would have a major impact in Portage County and surrounding areas.

Portage has been among the leading Ohio counties in abortion-to-birth ratios since abortion was legalized in 1973. Since 1996, about 20 percent of Portage County pregnancies have been aborted - the seventh highest percentage in the state according to information from the Ohio Department of Health. The total comes to more than 4,300 abortions in 10 years.

Cuyahoga County has the highest abortion percentage with more than 30 percent of its residents' pregnancies being terminated. Summit County is also near the top of the list with a 21 percent termination rate.

Mackura doesn't think those numbers are likely to change anytime soon, though. Precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court indicates that, even if Adams' bill passed, it would likely be ruled unconstitutional by the courts.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. That Dog Don't Hunt
I can't see this idiotic piece of legislation passing in the most backward circumstances, but it would be interesting for follow-up and a few laughs.

One other point of devil's advocacy: A mother could selectively present a list of alleged possible fathers who never had relations with her, or those partners who she knew were NOT the biological father. Why would THOSE persons object to the abortion?

This scenario would still exclude the biological father from the decision-making, undermining the already ridiculous intentions of the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. There has been so much legislation that we thought would "never pass"
I fear that in the current climate, this might get through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
37. That means the State of Ohio will require applications to have sex.
Wonder what they'll charge for that?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
38. a fundraising initiative
it'll probably never actually get voted on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
41. Evidently they don't know how many men want women to get an abortion -- !!!!!!
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 11:16 PM by defendandprotect
So, what if the female wants to go ahead with the pregnancy an the male wants her to have an abortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
43. K&R!!! n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
44. Stupid Fuckers!
I'd like to know how in the blue blazes they think they are going to force women to remain pregnant who don't want to be. If woman wants an abortion bad enough...she'll get it.

That's when women start dying.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
45. The right wing continues to get scarier every day
I am male, and I believe that if we could get pregnant, the religious right would be pro-choice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
46. A great suggestion on another thread
was to name any one of the Republican males supporting this bullshit as the father. I don't know, I thought it was pretty imaginative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
47. Do they have correspondence courses for abortionists?
The kind that used to advertise on matchbook covers back when people lit up with matches? "Make Big Money As An Abortion Doctor Just Across The Ohio State Line! Call Fetus-B-Gone Abortion School Today!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
48. What century is this?
How is it that as "enlightened" as we are supposed to be, shit like this keeps coming up?! Female adults do NOT need a man's permission for anything concerning her body! If married or in a relationship, then a consult would be nice, but anything past that...well, it's her choice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
49. I hope Governor Strickland has his veto pen ready
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC